Another dev/add pools header

[Another-DevX]

Description

Please include a summary of the change and if relevant which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Dependency changes
• Code refactor / cleanup
• Documentation or wording changes
• Other

How should this be tested?

Please provide instructions so we can test. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.

• Test A
• Test B

Visual context

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have requested at least 1 review (If the PR is significant enough, use best judgement here)
• I have commented my code where relevant, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• If package-lock.json has changes, it was intentional.
• The base of this PR is master if hotfix, develop if not

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
regenerative-fi-ui	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 30, 2024 3:53pm

[fabianschu]

Have you figured out why the subgraph can return multiple balancer entities? Formulated differently: it's not completely obvious for me why the subgraph returns an array here and under what conditions the array would contain more than one object. Do you have a suspicion here?

"balancers": [
      {
        "totalSwapVolume": "36.71838041831020998580002435787249",
        "totalLiquidity": "92.16052599111439610843035298991631",
        "id": "2",
        "poolCount": 5
      }
    ]

[fabianschu]

The Vercel build fails and test/lint CI are funky