Better checking of versions, other bugfixes

[VarLad]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 29 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 50.90%. Comparing base (30ffa3d) to head (3555404).

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/versions.jl	0.00%	29 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev      #30      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.33%   50.90%   -7.43%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines          96      110      +14     
==========================================
  Hits           56       56              
- Misses         40       54      +14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Azzaare]

I'm all ok with the current state or version handling in PerfChecker.

We do have file conflicts though, would you mind merging with dev and push them again?

Side note:

┌ Warning: `cpucores_total()` is deprecated, use `cputhreads()` instead.
│   caller = macro expansion at check.jl:22 [inlined]
└ @ Core ~/.julia/dev/PerfChecker/src/check.jl:22

Maybe we can fix that now.

[Azzaare]

Also, @VarLad , we need better tests in the sense that the current tests do not use the versions' system that you implemented. Furthermore, we need to fix the same things in the perf folder for GLM and PatternFolds.

[VarLad]

I believe new tests and separation of creating the dictionary as a variable from macro parameters should be done in another PR.
I've resolved the conflicts and fixed the mentioned warning.