Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tweak fit_data_scitype fallback to resolve issue with class weights #195

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

ablaom
Copy link
Member

@ablaom ablaom commented Mar 22, 2024

Resolves #170.

We need an Any type where we had AbstractDict{...}, which doesn't make sense, because currently dictionaries have Unknown scitype, unless they are keyed on integer (multisets).

@ablaom
Copy link
Member Author

ablaom commented Mar 22, 2024

To do:

  • Check MLJ integration tests locally

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.53%. Comparing base (3e36cc7) to head (12f588e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #195   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.53%   88.53%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         375      375           
=======================================
  Hits          332      332           
  Misses         43       43           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ablaom ablaom merged commit 5ac60f3 into dev Mar 22, 2024
5 checks passed
@ablaom ablaom mentioned this pull request Mar 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Problem with fit_model_scitype fallback for class weight support
1 participant