Skip to content

A docker-image that can be used as a workaround for the missing/verbose 'extends' syntax in configuration-files for docker-compose version 3

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

JanNash/docker_noop

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

8 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

What

Using this dockerfile, you can build an image that is only 909 kB big:
jannnash/noop 0.1.0 044121226051 19 seconds ago 909 kB

The image is so small because it's a base image built from scratch (that pun is to be blamed on the docker-folks :D), which includes the statically (that's why it's 'so big') compiled version of noop.c.

Why

Running a container built from this image does obviously not make any sense, so what do you use it for? Now, docker-compose version 3 does not yet support a functionality similar to (or at least similarly simple as) the extends-functionality that could be used in version 2 to get rid of repeated configuration in your compose-file.

I hacked this together because I wanted to share environment variables between some services in the docker-compose file I'm using for a small project. Having to update the same path at 4 different places simply is a pain, so I searched for a way to deduplicate configurations.

On a MacBook Air Early 2015 with a 2.2 i7 and 8G RAM (everything timed once with 'time'),

  • building the image takes only quarter of a second
  • creating a container from the image takes around .9 of a second
  • running the container takes around 2 seconds

The image has a size of 909 kB and a container created from the image has no extra size overhead to the image.

In conclusion, the workaround does not really create any overhead for your docker-compose setup apart from creating some extra containers, which clutter the output of docker ps -a.

How

If anyone wants to elaborate on anchors and references in .yml, feel free to send me a PR with an extended version of this README. Personally, I think, it's fairly simple, so I will let this sample docker-compose configuration speak for itself:

version: '3'


volumes:
  quak:


services:
  common-env:
    build:
      context: ./noop
    image: noop
    container_name: common-env
    environment: &foo
      FOO_CONTAINER: foo
    environment: &foo_env
      FOO_CONTAINER_BAZ: baz
    environment: &bar
      BAR_CONTAINER: bar
    environment: &bar_env
      BAR_CONTAINER_BOING: boing
    environment:
      - &oink ./oink:/usr/share/oink
      - &quak quak:/usr/share/quak

  foo: 
    container_name: foo
    image: debian:jessie-slim
    volumes:
      - *oink
    environment: 
      <<: *foo_env

  bar: 
    container_name: bar
    image: debian:jessie-slim
    volumes: 
      - *quak
    environment:
      <<: *bar_env

  klonk:
    image: debian:jessie-slim
    volumes:
      - *oink
      - *quak
    environment:
      <<: *foo
      <<: *bar
      <<: *foo_env
      <<: *bar_env

About

A docker-image that can be used as a workaround for the missing/verbose 'extends' syntax in configuration-files for docker-compose version 3

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published

Languages