check

book.tex

@@ -8943,15 +8943,24 @@ \section{Remove Complex Operands}
   form executes the statements $ss$ and then returns the result of
   expression $e$.}
 
-Add cases to the \code{rco\_exp} and \code{rco\_atom} functions for
-the new features in \LangIf{}. In recursively processing
-subexpressions, recall that you should invoke \code{rco\_atom} when
-the output needs to be an \Atm{} (as specified in the grammar for
-\LangIfANF{}) and invoke \code{rco\_exp} when the output should be
-\Exp{}.  Regarding \code{if}, it is particularly important 
-\emph{not} to replace its condition with a temporary variable, because
-that would interfere with the generation of high-quality output in the
-upcoming \code{explicate\_control} pass.
+\racket{Add cases to the \code{rco\_exp} and \code{rco\_atom}
+  functions for the new features in \LangIf{}. In recursively
+  processing subexpressions, recall that you should invoke
+  \code{rco\_atom} when the output needs to be an \Atm{} (as specified
+  in the grammar for \LangIfANF{}) and invoke \code{rco\_exp} when the
+  output should be \Exp{}.}
+%
+\python{Add cases to the \code{rco\_exp} function for the new features
+  in \LangIf{}. In recursively processing subexpressions, recall that
+  you should invoke \code{rco\_exp} with the extra argument
+  \code{True} when the output needs to be an \Atm{} (as specified in
+  the grammar for \LangIfANF{}) and \code{False} when the output
+  should be \Exp{}.}
+%
+Regarding \code{if}, it is particularly important \emph{not} to
+replace its condition with a temporary variable, because that would
+interfere with the generation of high-quality output in the upcoming
+\code{explicate\_control} pass.
 
 \newcommand{\LifMonadASTRacket}{
 \begin{array}{rcl}