♻️ refactor github workflow file

[bisgaard-itis]

What do these changes do?

• refactor github workflow file
• add a new github workflow which is required to run when merging into master (i.e. it is only run on PRs)

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.29%. Comparing base (e9bc718) to head (c9be60f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (e9bc718) and HEAD (c9be60f). Click for more details.

HEAD has 29 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (e9bc718)	HEAD (c9be60f)
unittests	30	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6926       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   88.23%   66.29%   -21.94%     
===========================================
  Files        1571      672      -899     
  Lines       61649    31996    -29653     
  Branches     2000      262     -1738     
===========================================
- Hits        54393    21212    -33181     
- Misses       6920    10724     +3804     
+ Partials      336       60      -276     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
integrationtests	65.05% <ø> (+1.10%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from ed17770
unittests	90.57% <ø> (+4.03%)	⬆️

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	77.37% <ø> (-8.02%)	⬇️
agent	∅ <ø> (∅)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	90.57% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	∅ <ø> (∅)
director_v2	78.78% <ø> (-12.61%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	59.86% <ø> (-29.89%)	⬇️
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	∅ <ø> (∅)
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	59.65% <ø> (-28.29%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e9bc718...c9be60f. Read the comment docs.

[pcrespov]

nice. can we apply more of this magic and reduce further the verbose content of ci-testing-deploy.yml?

[bisgaard-itis]

nice. can we apply more of this magic and reduce further the verbose content of ci-testing-deploy.yml?

We could probably reuse some workflows. However, I will not do that here as the workflow file I introduce here will only run on PRs (differently from the other workflow file)

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud