⚗️CI: Separate image building of frontend

[sanderegg]

What do these changes do?

Building the frontend docker image seems to become more and more resource intensive on the github runners, especially when USA wakes up.

This PR:

• separates in 2 separate jobs building of the backend and the frontend,
• both upload now to an CI artifact named docker-buildx-images-${{ runner.os }}-${{ github.sha }}-backend and docker-buildx-images-${{ runner.os }}-${{ github.sha }}-frontend ,
• integration tests that only need the backend depend only on the backend images being built
• system tests need both the backend and frontend now have that additional dependency
• improved load images step by parallelizing (gain of ~50%, ~1m20 to 30-40s),
• some small changes in dockerfile caching that might bring some help
• removed step to delete data that takes 1minute for deletion

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.31%. Comparing base (186c07b) to head (f4c2e35).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6918      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.35%   89.31%   +0.96%     
==========================================
  Files        1571     1112     -459     
  Lines       61614    48408   -13206     
  Branches     1999      403    -1596     
==========================================
- Hits        54437    43237   -11200     
+ Misses       6841     5091    -1750     
+ Partials      336       80     -256     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.05% <ø> (-0.13%)	⬇️
unittests	87.02% <ø> (+0.49%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	70.02% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.38% <ø> (ø)
agent	97.00% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.04% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	95.21% <ø> (ø)
catalog	90.57% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.48% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	93.18% <ø> (ø)
director	76.49% <ø> (+0.08%)	⬆️
director_v2	91.38% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	97.07% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	89.75% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	90.12% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.44% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.65% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.07% <ø> (+0.29%)	⬆️
storage	89.66% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	88.37% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 186c07b...f4c2e35. Read the comment docs.

[pcrespov]

OK. So front-end and backend images are now created separately.
Thx

[matusdrobuliak66]

Thanks

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[odeimaiz]

Really appreciated 👏

[bisgaard-itis]

Cool, thanks a lot. 👍🏻