♻️ Redirecting inputs retrieval via dynamic-scheduler ⚠️

[GitHK]

⚠️ devops

• dynamic-scheduler also uses existing DYNAMIC_SIDECAR_API_SAVE_RESTORE_STATE_TIMEOUT
• no action required

What do these changes do?

Inputs retrieval is now redirected via dynamic-scheduler.

Bonus:

• unified retrieve calls in webserver

Related issue/s

• fixes merge retrieve and request_retrieve_dyn_service functions in webserver code #3191
• dynamic scheduler: extract scheduling logic and move it away from director-v2 #5632
• requirement: reroute director-v2 service calls via dynamic-scheduler from webserver #6894
• closes redirect service_retrieve_data_on_ports call via dynamic-scheduler #6909

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.21277% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.68%. Comparing base (75aed81) to head (d72d8c9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6908      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.06%   87.68%   +0.62%     
==========================================
  Files        1611     1586      -25     
  Lines       63598    62313    -1285     
  Branches     2025     2026       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        55370    54641     -729     
+ Misses       7894     7338     -556     
  Partials      334      334              

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.91% <50.00%> (+0.98%)	⬆️
unittests	85.94% <70.21%> (+0.59%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	93.49% <ø> (ø)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	97.09% <ø> (ø)
pkg_models_library	91.36% <ø> (ø)
pkg_notifications_library	84.57% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.26% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_integration	70.02% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	74.20% <0.00%> (-0.09%)	⬇️
pkg_settings_library	90.60% <ø> (ø)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.38% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.82% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.13% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.09% <ø> (ø)
catalog	90.57% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.48% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	93.18% <ø> (ø)
director	76.57% <50.00%> (+0.17%)	⬆️
director_v2	91.41% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
dynamic_scheduler	97.10% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
dynamic_sidecar	89.72% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
efs_guardian	90.12% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.44% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.58% <ø> (ø)
storage	89.54% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	86.19% <50.00%> (+1.82%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 75aed81...d72d8c9. Read the comment docs.

[YuryHrytsuk]

There is a new ENV.

Shall we expect the releated PR in config repo?

[GitHK]

There is a new ENV.

Shall we expect the releated PR in config repo?

@YuryHrytsuk just updated the description. it's and existing env. I expect no changes.

[pcrespov]

thx. But I have the same question as in #6943 (review)

[pcrespov]

thx for the explanation.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud