Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Front-end: fixes PO center widget #6496

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 7, 2024

Conversation

pcrespov
Copy link
Member

@pcrespov pcrespov commented Oct 7, 2024

What do these changes do?

Minor bug on assigning rich to the box control instead of the label control. This error would not allow the PO center widget to start at all

Related issue/s

How to test

Manually tested

Dev-ops checklist

None

@pcrespov pcrespov added the a:frontend issue affecting the front-end (area group) label Oct 7, 2024
@pcrespov pcrespov added this to the MartinKippenberger milestone Oct 7, 2024
@pcrespov pcrespov self-assigned this Oct 7, 2024
@pcrespov pcrespov changed the title 🐛 Front-en: fixes PO center widget 🐛 Front-end: fixes PO center widget Oct 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@matusdrobuliak66 matusdrobuliak66 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@pcrespov pcrespov enabled auto-merge (squash) October 7, 2024 14:20
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 7, 2024

@pcrespov pcrespov disabled auto-merge October 7, 2024 15:02
@pcrespov pcrespov enabled auto-merge (squash) October 7, 2024 15:03
@pcrespov pcrespov merged commit 515278a into ITISFoundation:master Oct 7, 2024
51 checks passed
@pcrespov pcrespov deleted the fix/po-center-bad-setting branch October 7, 2024 15:45
mrnicegyu11 pushed a commit to mrnicegyu11/osparc-simcore that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
a:frontend issue affecting the front-end (area group)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants