✨oSPARC API keys are created and removed if a service requires them

[GitHK]

What do these changes do?

DISCLAIMER: This PR, being small, is more noisy than I would have preferred.

Makes sure that for every each run there are different oSPARC API keys for each service which requires them.

• Creates API keys when a service requires them, ONLY if they are requested.
• Removes create API keys when the service shuts down, ONLY if they were created.

Changes per service:

packages:

• ✨ added BaseOsparcGenericResourceManager. The user only needs to create read and delete and the resource lifecycle is simplified.
• ♻️ ApiKeyInDB moved from api-server to models-library

director-v2:

• ✨ director-v2 creates and removes api keys, if required, whenever a service is started and shut down
• ✨ implemented resolve_and_substitute_lifespan_variables_in_specs and now used when starting dynamic-services

webserver:

• 🐛 fixed webserver's web API spec
• ✨ added new RPC route to webserver to get an existing API key
• ✨ added tests for the RPC part of the API Keys inside webserver
• code to extend the API for getting an api key Extend webserver's ApiKey API #5022

Related issue/s

How to test

DevOps Checklist

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5004 (f8f6a4d) into master (cd84f2f) will increase coverage by 0.1%.
The diff coverage is 84.4%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #5004     +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage    87.2%   87.4%   +0.1%     
========================================
  Files        1250    1047    -203     
  Lines       51237   46090   -5147     
  Branches     1107     540    -567     
========================================
- Hits        44699   40297   -4402     
+ Misses       6299    5672    -627     
+ Partials      239     121    -118     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.0% <71.2%> (-0.1%)	⬇️
unittests	84.9% <74.8%> (-0.1%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
.../models_library/api_schemas_api_server/api_keys.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...rc/simcore_service_director_v2/core/application.py	97.4% <100.0%> (+<0.1%)	⬆️
...v2/modules/dynamic_sidecar/docker_compose_specs.py	97.9% <100.0%> (+<0.1%)	⬆️
...service_director_v2/utils/distributed_identifer.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...core_service_director_v2/utils/osparc_variables.py	95.5% <100.0%> (+<0.1%)	⬆️
...ver/src/simcore_service_webserver/api_keys/_api.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...rver/src/simcore_service_webserver/api_keys/_db.py	94.3% <100.0%> (+1.0%)	⬆️
...ver/src/simcore_service_webserver/api_keys/_rpc.py	100.0% <100.0%> (+11.1%)	⬆️
...re_service_director_v2/modules/api_keys_manager.py	87.5% <87.5%> (ø)
...s/dynamic_sidecar/scheduler/_core/_events_utils.py	92.3% <61.1%> (-2.5%)	⬇️
... and 1 more

... and 210 files with indirect coverage changes

[pcrespov]

i do not want to delay this more ... but I think this PR will have an unnecessary maintenance overhead :-(

[sanderegg]

go for it and thanks for the changes and talk!

[codeclimate]

Code Climate has analyzed commit f8f6a4d and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.1% Duplication