Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add first draft of ZenIP 42202 for non-ceasable sidechains #17

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Binary file added ZenIP-42202/ZenIP-42202-1.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Binary file added ZenIP-42202/ZenIP-42202-2.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
119 changes: 119 additions & 0 deletions zenip-42202.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@

# ZenIP-42202

ZenIP: 42202
Title: Non-ceasable Sidechains
Owner: Paolo Tagliaferri, <[email protected]>; cronic, <[email protected]>
Discussions-To: Paolo Tagliaferri, <[email protected]>
Comments-URI: https://horizen.global/invite/discord
Status: Draft
Type: Consensus
Created: 2022-08-01
License: MIT

## Table of Contents

<!--ts-->

- [Abstract](#abstract)
- [Motivation](#motivation)
- [Specification](#specification)
- [Constraints](#constraints)
- [Maturity](#maturity)


## Abstract

This document describes the introduction of a new type of sidechains that “never cease” from processing transactions. The version for this type of sidechains is “v2”.
cronicc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

Currently, all sidechains must specify a `withdrawalEpochLength` at creation time, and such value immediately determines when a submission window opens and closes for each epoch.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

The life cycle of any sidechain is composed of epochs, that are sets of consecutive blocks whose size is determined by the `withdrawalEpochLength`. The first epoch begins with the block in which the sidechain is created (through a transaction containing its SidechainCreationOutput), the second one starts after `withdrawalEpochLength` blocks and so on.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

At the beginning of any epoch, except for the first one, there is a subset of blocks that constitutes the so-called **submission window**, in which the sidechain is required to publish at least one certificate for the previous epoch. Any certificate received outside this window is automatically rejected.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

Certificates act as an heartbeat of a sidechain and are the only way to move coins back to the mainchain.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

If a sidechain doesn’t provide at least one certificate for an epoch, it is considered as “ceased” and no more transactions to and from the sidechain are accepted (only *Ceased Sidechain Withdrawals* are allowed as an emergency procedure to recover funds).
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

![A ceasable sidechain](ZenIP-42202/ZenIP-42202-1.png)

We propose to introduce sidechains v2 that are not required to submit certificates during a submission window but can continue to process transactions without the risk of ceasing.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

Please note that this non-ceasing behavior is not enabled for all sidechains v2, but it must be explicitly requested by setting the `withdrawalEpochLength` to “0”.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

To recap, sidechains v2 will have two different behaviors based on the creation parameters:
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

- if the `withdrawalEpochLength` is set to “0”, the sidechain never cease
cronicc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

- if the `withdrawalEpochLength` is not “0”, the sidechain works exactly as sidechains v1 (with normal ceasing behavior)
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## Motivation

The entire sidechain mechanism that has been included in the Zen blockchain under the name of “Zendoo“ was designed and implemented having in mind the security of users in a fully decentralized scenario.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

In the meanwhile, some sidechains have started to be implemented in semi-centralized environments, where security constraints are way more relaxed.
cronicc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

For instance, in a fully decentralized sidechain, the `Mainchain Backward Transfer Request` (MBTR) guarantees to users the possibility to perform withdrawal of funds directly from mainchain in case the sidechain is somehow compromised (but continues to publish certificates). Instead, if the sidechain ceases, users can still retrieve their funds by using the `Ceased Sidechain Withrawal` (CSW) mechanism.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

In semi-centralized environments, where users can trust the actors running the sidechain, those withdrawal mechanisms (MBTR and CSW) are not needed and users can rely on the normal Backward Transfer mechanism triggered on the sidechain itself. Moreover, in these environments, having fixed certificate submission windows may lead to unwanted or unexpected ceasing due to a variety of reasons:
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

- bugs in the software running the nodes

- connectivity issues

- congestion of blocks (too many transactions and certificates for one single block)

**Note**: The changes proposed in this ZenIP can mitigate such risks without affecting the security of the sidechain.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## Specification

The creation of sidechains v2 is triggered by the consensus rules starting with the activation of the fork point #10.

Any attempt to create a sidechain v2 on mainnet before that height will be rejected.

Sidechains v2 will keep all the features included in v1 in addition to the possibility to enable the non-ceasing behavior by properly setting the `withdrawalEpochLength`.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

![Non-ceasable sidechain](ZenIP-42202/ZenIP-42202-1.png)

### Constraints

Sidechains v2 will never cease when setting `withdrawalEpochLength` to “0” at creation time. They are not forced to publish certificates during fixed submission windows. However, they can publish a certificate whenever they want, with the only two following constraints:
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

- The `epoch` values of certificates must be consecutive (i.e. after a certificate of epoch N the sidechain must publish a certificate of epoch N + 1)

- The `quality` mechanism is disabled, so it’s not possible to publish two or more certificates for the same epoch
otoumas marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

These non-ceasable sidechains must satisfy the following constraints:

- **Sidechain Creation**

- `withdrawalEpochLength` must be set to 0 (to disable the fixed-length epochs and submission windows, otherwise they work exactly as sidechains v1 do).
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

- `mainchainBackwardTransferRequestDataLength` must be set to 0 (to disable the MBTR).

- `wCeasedVk` must be empty (to disable the CSW).
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

- **Certificates**

- The `quality` field must always be set to “0”.

- If mainchain receives first a certificate of epoch N (either in mempool or in a block) and then another certificate of same epoch, the latter is rejected.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

- All certificates must refer (through the `endEpochCumScTxCommTreeRoot` field) to different ordered block. So, for instance, if the mainchain receives a certificate for epoch N referring to the mainchain block M (i.e. setting the `endEpochCumScTxCommTreeRoot `field to the same value specified in the header of the mainchain block M), any certificate coming next must refer to a `endEpochCumScTxCommTreeRoot` (and thus to a block) with higher height than M (M + 1, M + 2, etc., are all good candidates). Such constraint enforces that a certificate of higher epoch refers to a more updated state of the mainchain and of the sidechain.

- More than one certificate for the same sidechain can be included in the same block (if they respect all the constraints above).
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

When sidechains v2 are created with `withdrawalEpochLength` not set to 0, they will enable the default ceasing mechanism as it is intended for sidechains v1.
cronicc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

### Maturity
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

For sidechain v0 and v1, Zendoo implements a maturity mechanism for the amount of coins transferred to and from any sidechain.

For instance, whenever transactions are created with a cross-chain output (sidechain creation, forward transfer, or mainchain backward transfer request), the coins and fees are able to move to the sidechain but the amount is not immediately added to its balance. The coins are marked as immature and after some block confirmation, they are included in the sidechain balance. The number of confirmations is set to `10` blocks for mainnet in the chain parameters.
cronicc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

The same concept applies to backward transfers in a certificate. During the submission window phase, a certificate can be superseded by another certificate of higher quality. In this case, it makes sense to mark the backward transfers as immature until the certificate is final.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

Moreover, a certificate can be reverted back, just in case a sidechain ceases. Zendoo considers maturity of any backward transfer included in a top quality certificate for epoch N only after the end of the submission window for epoch N + 1.
cronicc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

Since non-ceasable sidechains don’t support the CSW, such maturity concept is not useful. Therefore, the maturity is going to be ignored and every cross-chain output or backward transfer will be immediately considered spendable (and added/removed to the sidechain balance). This only applies to sidechains v2 with `withdrawalEpochLength` set to “0”.
ptagl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved