Feat/base recurring donations #4894
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates across multiple localization files and components related to recurring donations. Key changes include updating localization strings in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationModal/RecurringDonationModal.tsx (1)
259-275: Improve flow update logicThe determination of
willUpdateFlowcould be simplified for better readability. Currently, it reassignswillUpdateFlowbased on the result ofcheckIfRecurringFlowExist.Consider initializing
willUpdateFlowusing the result of the flow existence check directly whenisUpdatingis false.Apply this diff to simplify the logic:
-let willUpdateFlow = isUpdating; - -// if isUpdating is false we need to check if there is an existing flow in the network -if (willUpdateFlow === false) { +const willUpdateFlow = isUpdating || ( const existingFlow = await checkIfRecurringFlowExist( sf, _superToken.id, address, projectAnchorContract, signer, ); if (existingFlow.exists && existingFlow.flowRate !== '0') { - willUpdateFlow = true; + true; } else { - willUpdateFlow = false; + false; } -}This change initializes
willUpdateFlowtotrueifisUpdatingistrueor an existing flow is found.src/components/views/donate/WrongNetworkLayer.tsx (2)
47-54: Simplify conditional chain switching with optional chainingThe static analysis suggests using optional chaining to streamline the
switchChainfunction calls.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
if (isOnEVM) { - switchChain && - switchChain({ - chainId: config.OPTIMISM_CONFIG.id, - }); + switchChain?.({ + chainId: config.OPTIMISM_CONFIG.id, + }); } else { await handleSingOutAndSignInWithEVM(); }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 48-54: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
65-71: Simplify conditional chain switching with optional chainingSimilarly, apply optional chaining when switching to the Base network.
Apply this diff:
if (isOnEVM) { - switchChain && - switchChain({ - chainId: config.BASE_CONFIG.id, - }); + switchChain?.({ + chainId: config.BASE_CONFIG.id, + }); } else { await handleSingOutAndSignInWithEVM(); }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 66-71: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
src/types/config.ts (1)
175-177: Consider aligning BaseNetworkConfig with OptimismNetworkConfigThe
BaseNetworkConfiginterface might need additional properties that are present inOptimismNetworkConfigfor feature parity, such as:
superFluidSubgraphanchorRegistryAddressGIVETH_ANCHOR_CONTRACT_ADDRESSAlso, consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the purpose and requirements of this interface.
Consider expanding the interface:
export interface BaseNetworkConfig extends NetworkConfig { + /** Array of supported SuperFluid tokens on the Base network */ SUPER_FLUID_TOKENS: Array<ISuperToken>; + superFluidSubgraph: string; + anchorRegistryAddress: Address; + GIVETH_ANCHOR_CONTRACT_ADDRESS: Address; }src/components/views/donate/Recurring/ModifySuperToken/DepositSuperToken.tsx (1)
Line range hint
104-120: Enhance error messages for better user experienceWhile the error handling is comprehensive, the error messages could be more user-friendly.
Consider this improvement:
- throw new Error('address not found1'); + throw new Error('Please connect your wallet to continue'); - throw new Error('SuperToken not found'); + throw new Error('Selected token configuration is invalid. Please try again or contact support');src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationCard.tsx (1)
791-791: Network ID handling improved with new propAdded
recurringNetworkIDprop to handle network-specific logic consistently across components.Consider extracting network validation logic into a custom hook for better reusability across components.
src/config/production.tsx (1)
Found inconsistency in DAIx token name configuration
The DAIx token in the BASE_CONFIG has an incorrect name. It's configured as "Coinbase wrapped BTC" but should be "Super Dai Stablecoin" to match its symbol and underlying token.
src/config/production.tsx: The DAIx token at address0x708169c8C87563Ce904E0a7F3BFC1F3b0b767f41has name "Coinbase wrapped BTC" but symbol "DAIx"All other token configurations (USDC, ETH, cbBTC, DEGEN and their super token variants) are consistent with their names, symbols, and addresses across the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
594-680: BASE_CONFIG added with comprehensive token configurationsThe Base network configuration includes detailed SUPER_FLUID_TOKENS setup with proper token mappings and metadata.
Let's verify the token addresses are correct:
Let me verify the token configurations further by checking if these tokens are consistently referenced across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify token addresses on Base network # Check if the addresses are valid contract addresses for addr in "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913" "0xD04383398dD2426297da660F9CCA3d439AF9ce1b" "0xcbB7C0000aB88B473b1f5aFd9ef808440eed33Bf" "0xDFd428908909CB5E24F5e79E6aD6BDE10bdf2327" "0x50c5725949A6F0c72E6C4a641F24049A917DB0Cb" "0x708169c8C87563Ce904E0a7F3BFC1F3b0b767f41" "0x4ed4E862860beD51a9570b96d89aF5E1B0Efefed" "0x1efF3Dd78F4A14aBfa9Fa66579bD3Ce9E1B30529"; do # Use rg to search for any references to these addresses in the codebase echo "Searching for address: $addr" rg -i "$addr" doneLength of output: 5391
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for token symbols to verify consistency for symbol in "USDCx" "ETHx" "cbBTCx" "DAIx" "DEGENx"; do echo "Searching for token symbol: $symbol" rg -i "symbol.*['\"]$symbol['\"]" -A 2 -B 2 done # Also check for any potential token address mismatches or duplicates for symbol in "USDC" "ETH" "cbBTC" "DAI" "DEGEN"; do echo "Searching for underlying token: $symbol" rg -i "symbol.*['\"]$symbol['\"]" -A 2 -B 2 doneLength of output: 14040
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
lang/ca.json(1 hunks)lang/en.json(1 hunks)lang/es.json(1 hunks)pages/test2.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/views/donate/Recurring/ModifySuperToken/DepositSuperToken.tsx(5 hunks)src/components/views/donate/Recurring/ModifySuperToken/ModifySuperTokenModal.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationCard.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationModal/RecurringDonationModal.tsx(14 hunks)src/components/views/donate/Recurring/SelectTokenModal/SelectTokenModal.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/views/donate/WrongNetworkLayer.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/views/userProfile/donationsTab/recurringTab/StreamRow.tsx(1 hunks)src/config/development.tsx(1 hunks)src/config/production.tsx(3 hunks)src/helpers/donate.ts(2 hunks)src/types/config.ts(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- lang/en.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/views/donate/WrongNetworkLayer.tsx
[error] 48-54: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 66-71: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
pages/test2.tsx (1)
269-273: Confirm the correct method usage for token approval
In the ERC-20 token approval process, there's a mix of methods used which may not be appropriate for underlying ERC-20 tokens.
Run the following script to verify the ERC-20 token contract's approve method:
✅ Verification successful
The token approval implementation appears to be correct
The code is using a proper pattern for ERC-20 token approval. From the search results, we can see that:
- The approval is implemented using a standard pattern with
approve()method - The approval transaction is properly awaited with
wait() - The implementation includes necessary parameters:
receiver: the address of the Super Tokenamount: the amount to approve
The code follows the expected flow: approve -> wait for confirmation -> proceed with the upgrade to Super Token.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the ERC-20 token contract has the standard approve method.
# Find occurrences of the approve function in ERC-20 contracts
fd -e js -e ts '.*' | xargs grep -E 'function approve\(' | grep -i 'ERC20'
# Expected: Should confirm that ERC-20 contracts use the standard approve method
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the token approval implementation
# First, let's search for the approveTx usage
rg -A 5 "approveTx"
# Also search for approve-related patterns in TypeScript/JavaScript files
rg -A 5 "\.approve\("
# Search for ERC20 contract imports or references
rg "ERC20"
Length of output: 7797
src/components/views/userProfile/donationsTab/recurringTab/StreamRow.tsx (1)
125-125: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify the fallback network ID value
Using 0 as a fallback when chainId is undefined might lead to unexpected behavior since 0 is not typically a valid network ID. Consider using a more appropriate fallback value or handling the undefined case differently.
Consider this safer approach:
-recurringNetworkID={chainId || 0}
+recurringNetworkID={chainId ?? config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER}src/types/config.ts (1)
229-229: Verify BASE_CONFIG implementation
Ensure that the implementation of BASE_CONFIG in the configuration files includes all required properties from the BaseNetworkConfig interface.
✅ Verification successful
Implementation of BASE_CONFIG is correctly aligned with BaseNetworkConfig interface
The verification shows that:
BaseNetworkConfigextendsNetworkConfigand requiresSUPER_FLUID_TOKENSarray- Both production and development configurations implement
BASE_CONFIGwith:- All inherited properties from
NetworkConfig(via...baseor...baseSepolia) - Required
SUPER_FLUID_TOKENSarray with proper token configurations - Additional chain-specific properties like
chainType,gasPreference, etc.
- All inherited properties from
The implementation in both environments is complete and consistent with the interface requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check BASE_CONFIG implementation
rg -A 10 "BASE_CONFIG.*=.*{"
Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for BASE_CONFIG implementation with fixed regex
rg "BASE_CONFIG\s*=\s*\{" -A 10
# Also search for BaseNetworkConfig interface definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface BaseNetworkConfig {
$$$
}'
# Search for any BASE_CONFIG assignments
rg "BASE_CONFIG\s*=" -A 10
Length of output: 123
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the BaseNetworkConfig interface definition
rg "interface BaseNetworkConfig" -A 20
# Let's also search for any files that might contain BASE_CONFIG
fd -t f | xargs grep -l "BASE_CONFIG"
# Search for any exports or declarations of BASE_CONFIG
rg "export.*BASE_CONFIG|declare.*BASE_CONFIG|const.*BASE_CONFIG|let.*BASE_CONFIG" -A 10
Length of output: 1607
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation in configuration files
rg -A 20 "BASE_CONFIG" src/config/production.tsx src/config/development.tsx src/configuration.ts
# Also check what NetworkConfig (parent interface) contains
rg "interface NetworkConfig" -A 20 src/types/config.ts
# Check if there are any imports of BaseNetworkConfig
rg "import.*BaseNetworkConfig"
Length of output: 4530
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/ModifySuperToken/DepositSuperToken.tsx (2)
44-45: LGTM: Chain ID handling is properly implemented
The addition of chain from useAccount hook and the fallback for recurringNetworkID is well implemented.
81-87: Verify network switching behavior
The network handling has been updated to use dynamic network ID instead of hardcoded values. However, we should verify the user experience during network switching.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to verify the network switching behavior more thoroughly.
Network switching implementation is properly handled with user feedback
The network switching implementation in ensureCorrectNetwork is well-structured with proper error handling:
- Uses wagmi's
switchChainfor reliable network switching - Verifies current chain before attempting switch
- Returns boolean to indicate success/failure
- Includes error logging for debugging
The implementation is consistent across all components and provides good user experience through:
- Pre-switch network verification
- Proper error handling with try-catch blocks
- Clear feedback through UI components like
WrongNetworkCover - Graceful fallback when switching fails
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper network handling across the codebase
# Check for network switching implementations
rg -A 3 "ensureCorrectNetwork"
# Verify error handling during network switching
rg -A 5 "chain.*id.*network.*switch"
Length of output: 6587
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of network switching logic
cat src/helpers/network.ts
# Look for error handling and user feedback during network switching
rg -A 5 "switchNetwork"
# Check for network-related hooks and configurations
rg -A 3 "useNetwork|getNetwork"
Length of output: 12424
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/SelectTokenModal/SelectTokenModal.tsx (1)
53-56: Verify token list consistency across networks
The conditional assignment of superTokens based on network is good, but we should ensure token configurations are consistent.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the token configurations across networks.
Token configurations are properly structured and consistent
The token configurations for both networks (Optimism and Base) follow the same structure with well-defined properties:
- Each token has consistent fields:
underlyingToken(with decimals, id, name, symbol, coingeckoId) and SuperToken fields (decimals, id) - Production config includes OP token for Optimism and USDC for Base
- Development config includes GIV token for Optimism and fUSDC for Base
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify token configurations across networks
# Check for token configurations in config files
rg -A 10 "SUPER_FLUID_TOKENS.*\["
# Look for potential token address references
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = {
$$$
SUPER_FLUID_TOKENS: $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2384
src/config/development.tsx (1)
427-443: Review token addresses and configuration
The SuperFluid token configuration for BASE network has been added. A few considerations:
- The token is marked as "fake" which is appropriate for development
- The decimals are set to 18 for both underlying and super token
- The coingecko ID is properly set
✅ Verification successful
Token configuration appears appropriate for development environment
The token configuration for BASE network has been verified and appears to be correctly implemented:
- The tokens are explicitly marked as "fake" tokens, which is appropriate for the development/test environment (baseSepolia network)
- Both underlying and super token configurations are consistent with 18 decimals
- The token addresses are only used in this development configuration file and nowhere else in the codebase
- The configuration follows the same pattern as other network configurations in the file
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify token configurations and usage
# Check for fake token usage across the codebase
rg "fUSDC.*Fake.*Token"
# Verify token decimal consistency
rg -A 2 "decimals.*18.*id.*0x"
Length of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the token configuration more thoroughly
# Check all token configurations in development.tsx
cat src/config/development.tsx
# Search for any other token configurations with similar addresses
rg "0x6B0dacea6a72E759243c99Eaed840DEe9564C194|0x1650581F573eAd727B92073B5Ef8B4f5B94D1648"
# Look for any security-related patterns or validations for token configurations
rg -i "validatetoken|tokenvalidation|verify.*token"
Length of output: 17936
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationCard.tsx (1)
764-767: Network validation logic updated to support Base network
The network validation has been expanded to include the Base network alongside Optimism, improving the platform's network coverage for recurring donations.
src/config/production.tsx (1)
Line range hint 583-593: ARBITRUM_CONFIG added with essential network settings
The Arbitrum network configuration is properly structured with all required fields.
lang/es.json (1)
867-867: Updated recurring donations network availability message
The Spanish localization has been correctly updated to reflect the availability of recurring donations on both Optimism and Base networks.
lang/ca.json (1)
867-867: LGTM! Translation update for recurring donations networks
The translation has been correctly updated to include both Optimism and Base networks. The Catalan translation is grammatically correct and consistent with the feature changes.
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationModal/RecurringDonationModal.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/ModifySuperToken/ModifySuperTokenModal.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/helpers/donate.ts (3)
20-29: Add type safety for network IDsConsider using an enum or constants for network IDs to improve type safety and maintainability.
+// At the top of the file +export enum RecurringNetwork { + OPTIMISM = config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER, + BASE = config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER +} -export const findSuperTokenByTokenAddress = ( - tokenAddress: Address, - recurringNetworkID: number, -) => { +export const findSuperTokenByTokenAddress = ( + tokenAddress: Address, + recurringNetworkID: RecurringNetwork, +) => { - if (recurringNetworkID === config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER) { + if (recurringNetworkID === RecurringNetwork.OPTIMISM) {
66-67: Add JSDoc documentationAdd comprehensive documentation to explain the function's purpose, parameters, and return value.
+/** + * Checks if a Superfluid flow exists between a sender and receiver for a specific token + * @param sf - Superfluid Framework instance + * @param superTokenAddress - Address of the Super Token + * @param senderAddress - Address of the flow sender + * @param receiverAddress - Address of the flow receiver + * @param signer - Ethereum signer + * @returns {Promise<{exists: boolean, flowRate: string}>} Object indicating if flow exists and its rate + */ export const checkIfRecurringFlowExist = async (
Line range hint
6-94: Consider implementing a robust error handling strategyThe current implementation would benefit from a consistent error handling approach across the donation system. Consider:
- Creating custom error types for different scenarios (network errors, flow errors, etc.)
- Implementing a centralized error handling utility
- Adding proper error logging and monitoring for production debugging
This would improve error tracking and user experience when issues occur during donation flows.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/helpers/donate.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/helpers/donate.ts (2)
6-29: Ensure proper handling of unrecognized network IDs
The function still defaults to Base configuration without validating if the recurringNetworkID is supported.
66-94: Handle specific errors when checking for existing flows
The error handling approach still treats all errors as "flow does not exist".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/views/donate/DonationCard.tsx (2)
66-72: Improve null safety with optional chainingThe current implementation could be improved using optional chaining to handle potential undefined values more elegantly.
-const hasBaseAddress = - addresses && - addresses.some( - address => - address.chainType === ChainType.EVM && - address.networkId === config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER, - ); +const hasBaseAddress = addresses?.some( + address => + address.chainType === ChainType.EVM && + address.networkId === config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER, +);🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 67-72: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Line range hint
134-141: Consider Base network in auto-tab selection logicThe commented out useEffect logic only considers Optimism network for auto-selecting the recurring tab. When this feature is re-enabled, consider including Base network support.
- // if (!router.query.tab && hasOpAddress && !isEndaomentProject) { + // if (!router.query.tab && (hasOpAddress || hasBaseAddress) && !isEndaomentProject) {🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 67-72: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/views/donate/DonationCard.tsx(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/views/donate/DonationCard.tsx
[error] 67-72: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/views/donate/DonationCard.tsx (1)
183-183: LGTM! Verify UI feedback for multi-network support
The condition correctly extends recurring donation support to include Base network. However, ensure that the UI properly communicates to users that recurring donations are now available on both networks.
Let's verify the UI text reflects multi-network support:
✅ Verification successful
UI text correctly reflects multi-network support
The UI strings properly communicate the availability of recurring donations on both Optimism and Base networks through the message: "Recurring donations are currently only available on Optimism or Base." This aligns with the code changes and provides clear guidance to users.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if UI strings properly indicate multi-network support
rg -l "recurring.*donation.*optimism" --type json
rg -l "recurring.*donation.*base" --type json
Length of output: 177
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of these strings to verify they properly indicate multi-network support
rg "recurring.*donation.*(?:optimism|base)" lang/en.json -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 668
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/config/development.tsx(1 hunks)src/config/production.tsx(3 hunks)src/types/config.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/config/development.tsx
- src/types/config.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/config/production.tsx (3)
Line range hint 583-594: Consider enhancing the Arbitrum configuration
The Arbitrum configuration appears to be minimal compared to other network configurations. Consider adding:
- Subgraph address for data indexing
- SuperFluid configuration for recurring donations support
Line range hint 594-605: Add subgraph address for Base network
The Base network configuration is missing a subgraph address, which might be required for data indexing.
605-681: Verify SuperFluid token addresses
Please verify that all SuperFluid token addresses are correct for the Base network. This is crucial for the recurring donations feature to work properly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🔭 Outside diff range comments (6)
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/ModifySuperToken/WithDrawSuperToken.tsx (1)
Line range hint
80-84: Move resolver address to configurationThe resolver address is hardcoded in the component. This should be moved to the configuration for better maintainability.
Consider moving this to your configuration file:
- resolverAddress: isProduction - ? undefined - : '0x554c06487bEc8c890A0345eb05a5292C1b1017Bd', + resolverAddress: isProduction + ? undefined + : config.SUPERFLUID_RESOLVER_ADDRESS,src/components/views/userProfile/projectsTab/ClaimWithdrawalModal.tsx (1)
Line range hint
223-223: Fix transaction link network IDThe transaction link always uses OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER regardless of the actual network used for the transaction.
-networkId: config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER, +networkId: recurringNetworkID,src/components/views/userProfile/projectsTab/ProjectActions.tsx (1)
Line range hint
151-164: Add error handling for network switchingThe network switching logic lacks error handling. Consider wrapping the switchChain call in a try-catch block to handle potential errors gracefully.
cb: () => { if (chainId !== config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER) { - switchChain({ - chainId: config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER, - }); + try { + switchChain({ + chainId: config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER, + }); + } catch (error) { + showToastError(error); + captureException(error, { + tags: { section: 'switchChain' }, + }); + } } else { setSelectedProject(project); setShowClaimModal && setShowClaimModal(true); } },src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/AdminActions.tsx (1)
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide the final response:
Chain switching implementation needs error handling and loading states
The review comment is correct. The codebase shows that:
- The
network.tshelper has error handling but only logs the error and returns false- Other components like
ProjectPublicActions.tsximplement proper loading states and error handling with toast messages- The
AdminActions.tsxcomponent lacks both loading state and error handling for chain switchingKey improvements needed:
- Add loading state during network switching
- Implement error handling with user feedback
- Use the existing toast notification system for errors
- Consider using the error handling pattern from
network.tshelper🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
119-133: Verify chain switching UX and error handlingThe chain switching logic needs additional error handling:
- No handling of failed chain switching
- No loading state during chain switching
- No user feedback during the process
Consider adding error handling and loading state:
cb: () => { if (chainId !== config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER) { - switchChain({ - chainId: config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER, - }); + try { + setIsLoading(true); + await switchChain({ + chainId: config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER, + }); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to switch network:', error); + // Show error toast + } finally { + setIsLoading(false); + } } else { setShowClaimModal && setShowClaimModal(true); } },
Let me analyze the chain switching implementations across the codebase to verify the error handling patterns.
Let me check if there are any loading states or error handling patterns used in the codebase.
Let me check if there are any existing loading states or error handling patterns in the AdminActions component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other chain switching implementations in the codebase rg -A 5 'switchChain\('Length of output: 3065
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the network helper implementation cat src/helpers/network.tsLength of output: 706
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for loading states and error handling patterns in components using switchChain rg -B 5 -A 10 'setIsLoading|setShowError|toast.error|catch\s*\(' src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/Length of output: 3053
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the AdminActions component implementation cat src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/AdminActions.tsxLength of output: 8126
src/components/views/userProfile/donationsTab/recurringTab/ModifyStreamModal/ModifyStreamInnerModal.tsx (2)
Precision loss risk confirmed in flow rate calculations
The codebase analysis reveals that the current implementation has potential precision loss risks due to:
- Converting BigInt to string, then to BigNumber, and back to BigInt
- Using
toFixed(0)which can truncate decimal places- Multiple division operations with BigInt that can lead to truncation
The suggested refactoring using continuous BigNumber operations would indeed provide better precision control, especially since other parts of the codebase (like in PublicBoostsTable.tsx) maintain BigNumber throughout calculations.
src/components/views/userProfile/donationsTab/recurringTab/ModifyStreamModal/ModifyStreamInnerModal.tsx: Implement the suggested BigNumber refactoring to maintain precision throughout the calculation chain.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
78-85: Verify BigNumber calculations for potential precision lossThe flow rate calculations involve multiple operations that could lead to precision loss:
- Converting BigInt to string and back
- Division operations that might truncate values
Consider using BigNumber throughout the calculation to maintain precision:
const flowRatePerMonth = - BigInt( - new BigNumber((balance?.value || 0n).toString()) - .multipliedBy(percentage) - .toFixed(0), - ) / 100n; + new BigNumber((balance?.value || 0n).toString()) + .multipliedBy(percentage) + .dividedBy(100) + .integerValue(BigNumber.ROUND_DOWN) + .toString();
Let me analyze the BigNumber calculations in the codebase further to understand the patterns and potential precision loss.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for similar BigNumber calculations in the codebase rg -A 5 'BigNumber.*multipliedBy|dividedBy'Length of output: 3845
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for BigInt conversions and operations in the codebase rg -A 3 'BigInt\(' src/components/views/userProfile/donationsTab/recurringTab/ModifyStreamModal/Length of output: 1642
The review comment is correct, but the suggested fix needs adjustment
Looking at the implementation and usages:
findAnchorContractAddressalready handles undefined chain ID by returningundefined- However, several components like
UpdateStreamInnerModalandRecurringDonationModalproperly check for undefined result and throw errors- The file in review (
ModifyStreamInnerModal) doesn't have this check, which could lead to null pointer issuesSuggested fix:
const anchorContractAddress = findAnchorContractAddress( donation.project.anchorContracts, chain?.id, ); +if (!anchorContractAddress) { + throw new Error('Project anchor contract not found for the current network'); +} for (let i = 0; i < tokenStream.length; i++) { const ts = tokenStream[i]; if (ts.receiver.id === anchorContractAddress) {Note: The original suggestion to add a fallback network is not recommended as it could lead to incorrect contract interactions. Instead, we should fail fast when no valid anchor contract is found, consistent with other components in the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
119-126: Verify anchor contract resolution across networksThe anchor contract resolution needs to handle the case when chain ID is undefined:
- No explicit handling of undefined chain ID
- Potential null pointer if anchorContractAddress is undefined
Add explicit chain ID handling:
const anchorContractAddress = findAnchorContractAddress( donation.project.anchorContracts, - chain?.id, + chain?.id ?? config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER, // fallback to default network ); +if (!anchorContractAddress) { + console.error('No anchor contract found for network:', chain?.id); + return; +}
Let me analyze the
findAnchorContractAddressimplementation and its usage across the codebase.
Let me try a different pattern to get the implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for other uses of findAnchorContractAddress rg -A 5 'findAnchorContractAddress'Length of output: 10216
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the implementation of findAnchorContractAddress ast-grep --pattern 'export const findAnchorContractAddress = ($_) => { $$$ }'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the implementation of findAnchorContractAddress function cat src/helpers/superfluid.tsLength of output: 774
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/ModifySuperToken/WithDrawSuperToken.tsx (1)
Line range hint
134-139: Document buffer calculation constantsThe buffer calculation uses a magic number (60) without clear documentation of its purpose. This could lead to maintenance issues.
Consider extracting and documenting the constant:
+ // Buffer time in seconds to prevent withdrawal errors due to ongoing streams + const STREAM_BUFFER_TIME = 60; if (SuperTokenBalance !== undefined && totalStreamPerSec > 0) { modifiedValue = { ...SuperTokenBalance, - value: SuperTokenBalance.value - totalStreamPerSec * BigInt(60), + value: SuperTokenBalance.value - totalStreamPerSec * BigInt(STREAM_BUFFER_TIME), }; }src/components/views/donate/Recurring/AlloProtocolFirstDonationModal.tsx (2)
67-126: Enhance error handling and transaction managementThe transaction handling implementation looks good overall, but could benefit from some improvements:
- Add specific error handling for common scenarios (network errors, user rejection)
- Consider adding a timeout for the transaction receipt wait
- Add loading state messages to improve user feedback
try { setIsLoading(true); + const timeoutMs = 60000; // 1 minute timeout if ( !project?.adminUser?.walletAddress || !isAddress(project?.adminUser?.walletAddress) ) { throw new Error('Invalid Project Admin Address'); } const hash = await writeContract(wagmiConfig, { // ... existing config ... }); setTxResult(hash); if (hash) { const data = await Promise.race([ waitForTransactionReceipt(wagmiConfig, { hash: hash, chainId: isOnOptimism ? config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER : config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER, }), + new Promise((_, reject) => + setTimeout(() => reject(new Error('Transaction timeout')), timeoutMs) + ), ]); // ... rest of the code ... } } catch (error) { - showToastError(error); + if (error.code === 4001) { + showToastError('Transaction was rejected by user'); + } else if (error.message === 'Transaction timeout') { + showToastError('Transaction took too long to complete. Please try again.'); + } else { + showToastError(error); + } }
95-101: Improve transaction feedback and modal managementThe current implementation could provide better feedback during the transaction process.
setTxResult(hash); if (hash) { + // Set a more specific loading message + setLoadingMessage('Waiting for transaction confirmation...'); const data = await waitForTransactionReceipt(wagmiConfig, { hash: hash, chainId: isOnOptimism ? config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER : config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER, }); + // Update loading message for backend update + setLoadingMessage('Updating project information...');Also, consider adding a success message before closing the modal:
await fetchProject(); + // Show success message + showToastSuccess('Recurring donation setup completed successfully!'); onModalCompletion();src/components/views/userProfile/projectsTab/ClaimWithdrawalModal.tsx (1)
Line range hint
98-177: Enhance transaction error handling and user feedbackThe transaction flow is well-structured but could benefit from improved error handling and user feedback:
- Network validation happens after logging
- Generic error handling might mask specific issues
- No cleanup on error
const handleConfirm = async () => { - console.log('anchorContractAddress', anchorContractAddress); try { + if (!projectAddress || !anchorContractAddress) { + throw new Error('Missing required addresses'); + } + await ensureCorrectNetwork(recurringNetworkID); - console.log('isETHx', isETHx); - await ensureCorrectNetwork(recurringNetworkID); // ... rest of the code ... } catch (error) { - console.error(error); - console.log('anchorContractAddress', anchorContractAddress); + const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error occurred'; + console.error('Transaction failed:', errorMessage, { anchorContractAddress, projectAddress }); setTransactionState(ClaimTransactionState.NOT_STARTED); + // Consider adding user notification here } };src/helpers/superfluid.ts (1)
16-22: Consider using early return pattern for better readabilityThe function could be refactored to use early returns for better readability and maintainability.
export const findAnchorContractAddress = ( anchorContracts?: IAnchorContractData[], chainId?: number, ) => { - if (!anchorContracts || !chainId) return undefined; - return anchorContracts.find( - contract => contract.isActive && contract.networkId == chainId, - )?.address; + if (!anchorContracts) return undefined; + if (!chainId) return undefined; + + const activeContract = anchorContracts.find( + contract => contract.isActive && contract.networkId === chainId, + ); + return activeContract?.address; };src/components/views/userProfile/donationsTab/recurringTab/ModifyStreamModal/UpdateStreamInnerModal.tsx (1)
Line range hint
57-146: Consider adding documentation for the transaction flowThe transaction handling logic is complex and would benefit from documentation explaining the flow and potential states.
Add JSDoc comments to explain:
- The transaction flow steps
- Error handling scenarios
- State management during the transaction
- Backend synchronization process
src/components/views/userProfile/donationsTab/recurringTab/ModifyStreamModal/ModifyStreamInnerModal.tsx (1)
Line range hint
251-254: Consider adding network indicator to the action buttonThe action button should indicate which network the stream will be created on, especially when network switching is involved.
<ActionButton label={formatMessage({ id: 'label.confirm' })} + leftIcon={<NetworkIcon chainId={chain?.id} />} onClick={() => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
src/components/views/create/AlloProtocol/AlloProtocolModal.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/views/donate/Recurring/AlloProtocolFirstDonationModal.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/views/donate/Recurring/ModifySuperToken/WithDrawSuperToken.tsx(4 hunks)src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationCard.tsx(4 hunks)src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationModal/RecurringDonationModal.tsx(14 hunks)src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/AdminActions.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/views/userProfile/donationsTab/recurringTab/ModifyStreamModal/ModifyStreamInnerModal.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/views/userProfile/donationsTab/recurringTab/ModifyStreamModal/UpdateStreamInnerModal.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/views/userProfile/projectsTab/ClaimWithdrawalModal.tsx(7 hunks)src/components/views/userProfile/projectsTab/ProjectActions.tsx(1 hunks)src/helpers/superfluid.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationCard.tsx
- src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationModal/RecurringDonationModal.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/ModifySuperToken/WithDrawSuperToken.tsx (1)
64-64: Verify network handling implementation
Let's ensure the network handling is consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Network handling implementation is consistent
The verification shows that ensureCorrectNetwork is properly implemented and consistently used across the codebase:
- The function is defined in
src/helpers/network.tsand imported correctly where needed - It's consistently used in recurring donation flows, including deposit/withdrawal operations
- The network switching is properly handled with chain ID validation
- The implementation is used consistently with the same network IDs (Optimism and Base networks) across components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check network handling implementation across the codebase
# Check for network ID usage
echo "Checking network ID usage patterns:"
rg -A 2 "ensureCorrectNetwork|chain\.id|networkID" --type typescript
# Check for hardcoded network values
echo "Checking for hardcoded network values:"
rg -A 2 "0x554c06487bEc8c890A0345eb05a5292C1b1017Bd" --type typescript
Length of output: 379
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without the typescript file type specification
echo "Checking network handling patterns:"
rg -A 2 "ensureCorrectNetwork|chain\.id|networkID"
echo -e "\nChecking network-related imports and utilities:"
rg -l "import.*network|network.*utils"
echo -e "\nChecking for network-related function definitions:"
ast-grep --pattern 'function ensureCorrectNetwork($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 11712
src/components/views/create/AlloProtocol/AlloProtocolModal.tsx (1)
174-183: Verify navigation logic
The navigation logic after successful transaction needs verification to ensure it handles all network scenarios correctly.
✅ Verification successful
Navigation logic is correctly implemented
The navigation logic in AlloProtocolModal.tsx is consistent with the rest of the codebase. The implementation follows the established pattern where:
slugToSuccessViewis used when a project is created in draft mode or during initial creationslugToProjectViewis used when editing an existing project
The functions are well-defined in src/lib/routeCreators.tsx and are used consistently across the codebase for similar scenarios. The navigation paths are properly constructed based on the project's slug.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all route handling implementations
rg -A 5 "slugToSuccessView|slugToProjectView" --type typescript
Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all route handling implementations without file type restriction
rg -A 5 "slugToSuccessView|slugToProjectView"
Length of output: 26416
src/components/views/userProfile/projectsTab/ClaimWithdrawalModal.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-267: Verify integration with donation system
The component handles complex transaction flows across multiple networks. Let's verify its integration with the broader donation system.
✅ Verification successful
Network handling and transaction flow are properly integrated
The component is correctly integrated with the donation system and follows consistent patterns:
- Network handling is properly implemented using
ensureCorrectNetworkacross all claim-related modals - Transaction states and network switching are handled consistently with other components
- The component is part of a well-structured hierarchy with
ClaimRecurringDonationModalas parent and proper integration with Superfluid streams - Network IDs (Optimism and Base) are handled consistently using configuration values
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify component integration and network handling
# Check for other components using the same transaction flow
echo "Checking for similar transaction patterns..."
rg -l "ClaimTransactionState" --type typescript
# Check for network handling consistency
echo "Checking network handling patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'ensureCorrectNetwork($_)'
# Look for other components using the same contract addresses
echo "Checking contract address usage..."
rg "anchorContractAddress|projectAddress" --type typescript
Length of output: 1609
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with proper file type flags for ripgrep
# Check for similar transaction patterns
echo "Checking transaction state usage..."
rg -t ts -t tsx "ClaimTransactionState"
# Check contract address usage
echo "Checking contract address usage..."
rg -t ts -t tsx "anchorContractAddress|projectAddress"
# Check for related components
echo "Checking related components..."
fd -e tsx -e ts "Claim.*Modal\.tsx$|Withdraw.*Modal\.tsx$"
Length of output: 628
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the related modal components and their integration
# Check ClaimModal content
echo "=== Content of ClaimModal.tsx ==="
cat src/components/modals/ClaimModal.tsx
# Check ClaimRecurringDonationModal content
echo -e "\n=== Content of ClaimRecurringDonationModal.tsx ==="
cat src/components/views/userProfile/projectsTab/ClaimRecurringDonationModal.tsx
# Let's also check for network handling in these files
echo -e "\n=== Network handling in claim modals ==="
rg --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts "network|chainId|OPTIMISM_NETWORK|BASE_NETWORK" src/components/modals/ClaimModal.tsx src/components/views/userProfile/projectsTab/ClaimRecurringDonationModal.tsx src/components/views/userProfile/projectsTab/ClaimWithdrawalModal.tsx
Length of output: 7025
src/components/views/userProfile/projectsTab/ProjectActions.tsx (1)
64-66: LGTM: Chain ID parameter correctly passed to findAnchorContractAddress
The chain ID is correctly passed to the findAnchorContractAddress function.
src/components/views/userProfile/donationsTab/recurringTab/ModifyStreamModal/UpdateStreamInnerModal.tsx (1)
54-54: LGTM: Chain ID correctly integrated with SuperFluid operations
The chain ID is properly extracted from useAccount and correctly passed to findAnchorContractAddress.
Also applies to: 62-64
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/AdminActions.tsx (1)
70-70: LGTM: Chain-aware anchor contract resolution
The addition of chain?.id parameter to findAnchorContractAddress improves network context awareness.
src/components/views/userProfile/donationsTab/recurringTab/ModifyStreamModal/ModifyStreamInnerModal.tsx (1)
65-65: LGTM: Consistent chain context usage
The addition of chain from useAccount hook aligns with the network-aware changes.
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/ModifySuperToken/WithDrawSuperToken.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| const isOnBase = chain ? chain.id === config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER : false; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
UI needs to be updated to reflect Base network support
While the code adds Base network support with isOnBase, the UI elements (button text and network information) still only reference Optimism. This creates a disconnect between the backend capability and frontend presentation.
The UI should be updated to:
- Show appropriate button text for Base network ("Switch to Base" when not on Base)
- Include Base network information in the modal text
- Handle network switching for both Optimism and Base networks
- <CustomButton
- label={isOnOptimism ? 'Confirm' : 'Switch To Optimism'}
- onClick={handleButtonClick}
- loading={isLoading}
- disabled={isLoading}
- />
+ <CustomButton
+ label={isOnOptimism || isOnBase ? 'Confirm' : 'Switch Network'}
+ onClick={handleButtonClick}
+ loading={isLoading}
+ disabled={isLoading}
+ />Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/AlloProtocolFirstDonationModal.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/AlloProtocolFirstDonationModal.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| let projectAddress = ''; | ||
| if (recurringNetworkID === config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER) { | ||
| projectAddress = | ||
| project.addresses?.find( | ||
| address => address.networkId === config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER, | ||
| )?.address || ''; | ||
| } else if (recurringNetworkID === config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER) { | ||
| projectAddress = | ||
| project.addresses?.find( | ||
| address => address.networkId === config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER, | ||
| )?.address || ''; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor project address determination to improve error handling
The current implementation has several issues:
- Duplicated logic for each network
- Silent failures with empty string fallback
- No error handling for missing project address
-let projectAddress = '';
-if (recurringNetworkID === config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER) {
- projectAddress =
- project.addresses?.find(
- address => address.networkId === config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER,
- )?.address || '';
-} else if (recurringNetworkID === config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER) {
- projectAddress =
- project.addresses?.find(
- address => address.networkId === config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER,
- )?.address || '';
-}
+const projectAddress = project.addresses?.find(
+ address => address.networkId === recurringNetworkID
+)?.address;
+
+if (!projectAddress) {
+ throw new Error(`No project address found for network ${recurringNetworkID}`);
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let projectAddress = ''; | |
| if (recurringNetworkID === config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER) { | |
| projectAddress = | |
| project.addresses?.find( | |
| address => address.networkId === config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER, | |
| )?.address || ''; | |
| } else if (recurringNetworkID === config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER) { | |
| projectAddress = | |
| project.addresses?.find( | |
| address => address.networkId === config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER, | |
| )?.address || ''; | |
| } | |
| const projectAddress = project.addresses?.find( | |
| address => address.networkId === recurringNetworkID | |
| )?.address; | |
| if (!projectAddress) { | |
| throw new Error(`No project address found for network ${recurringNetworkID}`); | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/config/production.tsx(3 hunks)src/types/config.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/types/config.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/config/production.tsx (3)
Line range hint 583-594: LGTM: Arbitrum configuration is properly structured.
The configuration includes all necessary basic fields for the Arbitrum network.
665-667: Fix incorrect token name for DAIx
The name for the DAIx super token is incorrectly set to "Coinbase wrapped BTC". This appears to be a copy-paste error.
- name: 'Coinbase wrapped BTC',
+ name: 'Super Dai Stablecoin',605-606: Verify contract addresses and token configurations
Please verify that all contract addresses and token configurations are correct for the Base network. This includes:
- GIVETH_ANCHOR_CONTRACT_ADDRESS
- Super token contract addresses (USDCx, ETHx, cbBTCx, DAIx, DEGENx)
Also applies to: 620-621, 635-636, 650-651, 665-666, 680-681
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationModal/RecurringDonationModal.tsx (1)
137-138:⚠️ Potential issueAdd network validation to prevent operations on unsupported chains
The current implementation uses
0as a fallback chain ID, which could lead to runtime errors. Consider adding validation to ensure the chain ID corresponds to a supported network (Optimism or Base) before proceeding.-const recurringNetworkID = chain?.id ?? 0; +const recurringNetworkID = chain?.id; +if (!recurringNetworkID || ![config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER, config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER].includes(recurringNetworkID)) { + throw new Error('Please switch to a supported network (Optimism or Base)'); +}src/components/views/donate/Recurring/AlloProtocolFirstDonationModal.tsx (1)
106-108:⚠️ Potential issueEnhance contract address extraction security
The current implementation of extracting the contract address from logs could be more robust.
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationModal/RecurringDonationModal.tsx (3)
261-276: Enhance error handling in flow existence checkWhile the flow existence check is a good addition, consider adding explicit error handling for the
checkIfRecurringFlowExistcall and providing user feedback.if (willUpdateFlow === false) { + try { const existingFlow = await checkIfRecurringFlowExist( sf, _superToken.id, address, projectAnchorContract, signer, ); if (existingFlow.exists && existingFlow.flowRate !== '0') { willUpdateFlow = true; } + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error checking existing flow:', error); + throw new Error('Failed to check existing recurring donation. Please try again.'); + } }
307-316: Remove debug console.log statementsRemove console.log statements from production code. Consider using a proper logging system if debugging information is needed.
-console.log( - 'isDonatingToGiveth', - isDonatingToGiveth, - willUpdateFlow, - donationToGiveth > 0, -);
Line range hint
372-391: Reduce duplication in draft donation creationThe
chainIdandisForUpdatevalues are repeated in both project and Giveth draft donation info. Consider extracting common values to reduce duplication.+const commonDraftDonationInfo = { + anonymous, + chainId: recurringNetworkID, + isBatch, + isForUpdate: willUpdateFlow, + superToken: _superToken, +}; const projectDraftDonationInfo: ICreateDraftRecurringDonation = { + ...commonDraftDonationInfo, projectId: +project.id, - anonymous, - chainId: recurringNetworkID, flowRate: _flowRate, - superToken: _superToken, - isBatch, - isForUpdate: willUpdateFlow, }; const givethDraftDonationInfo: ICreateDraftRecurringDonation = { + ...commonDraftDonationInfo, projectId: config.GIVETH_PROJECT_ID, - anonymous, - chainId: recurringNetworkID, flowRate: givethFlowRate, - superToken: _superToken, - isBatch, - isForUpdate: willUpdateFlow, };src/components/views/donate/Recurring/AlloProtocolFirstDonationModal.tsx (2)
77-85: Consider refactoring network-specific configuration selection.The nested ternary operators could be simplified for better readability by extracting network-specific configurations.
Consider this refactor:
-address: isOnOptimism - ? config.OPTIMISM_CONFIG.anchorRegistryAddress - : config.BASE_CONFIG.anchorRegistryAddress, -chainId: isOnOptimism - ? config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER - : config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER, +const networkConfig = isOnOptimism + ? { + address: config.OPTIMISM_CONFIG.anchorRegistryAddress, + chainId: config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER, + } + : { + address: config.BASE_CONFIG.anchorRegistryAddress, + chainId: config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER, + }; + +address: networkConfig.address, +chainId: networkConfig.chainId,
132-132: Consider a more maintainable network title implementation.The current implementation might become harder to maintain as more networks are added.
Consider using a mapping object:
-const thereTitle = isOnOptimism ? 'Optimism' : isOnBase ? 'Base' : ''; +const NETWORK_TITLES = { + [config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER]: 'Optimism', + [config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER]: 'Base', +} as const; +const thereTitle = chain ? NETWORK_TITLES[chain.id] || '' : '';Also applies to: 155-155
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/AlloProtocolFirstDonationModal.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/views/donate/Recurring/RecurringDonationModal/RecurringDonationModal.tsx(17 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/views/donate/Recurring/AlloProtocolFirstDonationModal.tsx (2)
66-67: LGTM! Network flag implementation is consistent.
The isOnBase flag follows the same pattern as isOnOptimism, with proper null checking using optional chaining.
69-128: Verify modal behavior during network switching.
The modal's state management during network switching should be verified to ensure a smooth user experience.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the modal state management is properly handled in the codebase:
- The modal state is controlled by
setShowModaland is properly closed in error cases via thefinallyblock. - Network switching is handled through wagmi's
switchChainutility, which is a standard and safe approach. - The modal state is independent of network changes and is managed through React's state management.
- Error handling is properly implemented with
showToastErrorin the catch block.
Let me verify one more aspect about the network switching handling:
Network switching and modal state are properly handled
The code shows proper network state management:
- Network state is tracked via
isOnOptimismandisOnBaseflags - Network-specific configurations are correctly applied based on the network state
- Modal state (
setShowModal) is managed independently of network operations - Error handling is implemented in try-catch blocks with proper cleanup in finally
- Transaction receipts are properly waited for with correct network parameters
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for network switching handling in the codebase
# Look for network switching event handlers
rg -A 5 "switchChain|switchNetwork" --type typescript
# Look for modal state management with network changes
rg -A 5 "setShowModal.*network|network.*setShowModal" --type typescript
# Check for error handling during network switches
ast-grep --pattern 'catch ($error) {
$$$
showToastError($error)
$$$
}'
Length of output: 278
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to verify network switching and modal behavior
# Search for network-related state management
rg -A 5 "setShowModal|isOnOptimism|networkId|chainId"
# Look for network switching related code
rg -A 5 "switch.*network|change.*network|network.*change"
# Check for error handling patterns
rg -A 5 "catch.*error.*showToastError"
# Look for modal state management
rg -A 5 "setShowModal.*\(false\)|setShowModal.*\(true\)"
Length of output: 106825
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for network-related state management in the component
rg -B 5 -A 5 "isOnOptimism|config\.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER|config\.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER" src/components/views/donate/Recurring/AlloProtocolFirstDonationModal.tsx
Length of output: 1923
| recurringNetworkID === config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER | ||
| ? config.OPTIMISM_CONFIG.GIVETH_ANCHOR_CONTRACT_ADDRESS | ||
| : config.BASE_CONFIG.GIVETH_ANCHOR_CONTRACT_ADDRESS; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve network-specific contract selection
The current implementation assumes only Optimism and Base networks. Consider adding a more robust network validation and contract selection mechanism.
-const givethAnchorContract =
- recurringNetworkID === config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER
- ? config.OPTIMISM_CONFIG.GIVETH_ANCHOR_CONTRACT_ADDRESS
- : config.BASE_CONFIG.GIVETH_ANCHOR_CONTRACT_ADDRESS;
+const networkConfig = {
+ [config.OPTIMISM_NETWORK_NUMBER]: config.OPTIMISM_CONFIG.GIVETH_ANCHOR_CONTRACT_ADDRESS,
+ [config.BASE_NETWORK_NUMBER]: config.BASE_CONFIG.GIVETH_ANCHOR_CONTRACT_ADDRESS,
+};
+const givethAnchorContract = networkConfig[recurringNetworkID];Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores