Changed the Display Section of Our Features and What Our users say #910
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve substantial modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
style.css (7)
Line range hint
1-3: Consolidate root variable declarationsThere are multiple
:rootdeclarations scattered throughout the file. This can lead to confusion and make maintenance difficult.Consolidate all color variables into a single
:rootblock at the top of the file::root { --soft-teal: #003d4d; -} - -/* ... other styles ... */ - -:root { --deep-teal: #003d4d; --off-white: #f8f9fa; --dark-slate: #2f4f4f; --soft-gold: #d9c79e; }Also applies to: 307-312
Line range hint
25-47: Resolve conflicting button stylesThere are duplicate
.btnclass definitions with conflicting styles. The first definition uses CSS variables with soft-gold background, while the second uses hardcoded colors with purple/orange scheme.Consolidate the button styles into a single definition:
.btn { display: inline-block; margin-top: 1rem; border-radius: 5rem; - background: var(--soft-gold); - color: var(--dark-slate); + background: #3f10ea; + color: #fff; padding: 0.9rem 3.5rem; cursor: pointer; font-size: 1.7rem; } .btn:hover { - background: var(--deep-teal); + background-color: #f03c0b; + color: white; } -/* Remove duplicate .btn definition */Also applies to: 48-63
Line range hint
89-106: Consolidate header logo stylesMultiple
.logostyle definitions with conflicting font sizes and colors.Consolidate the logo styles:
header .logo { font-size: 2.5rem; color: white; font-weight: bolder; -} - -header .logo { - font-size: 3rem; - color: white; - font-weight: bolder; - font-size: 2.5rem; }Also applies to: 107-111
Line range hint
199-204: Enhance dark mode implementationThe dark mode styles are minimal and don't cover all components. This could lead to inconsistent appearance when dark mode is enabled.
Consider implementing a more comprehensive dark mode:
.dark-mode { background-color: #121212; color: #ffffff; } /* Add dark mode styles for other components */ .dark-mode .btn { background-color: #1e1e1e; color: #ffffff; } .dark-mode .features-card, .dark-mode .testimonial-card { background-color: #1e1e1e; color: #ffffff; } .dark-mode .footer { background-color: #000000; }Also applies to: 208-211
Line range hint
379-391: Fix syntax error in ul selectorThere's a syntax error in the
.ulselector definition - missing closing brace.Fix the syntax and remove duplicate definition:
.ul { padding: 0; list-style: none; font-family: Verdana, Geneva, Tahoma, sans-serif; text-align: center; +} - -.ul { - padding: 0; - list-style: none; - font-family: Verdana, Geneva, Tahoma, sans-serif; - text-align: center;
Line range hint
584-587: Fix invalid background-color valueThe background-color property has an invalid hex color value.
Add the hash symbol to the hex color:
header { padding: 2rem; - background-color: 003d4d; + background-color: #003d4d; }
Line range hint
1-724: Improve code organization and documentationThe CSS file would benefit from better organization and documentation.
Consider organizing the CSS file into logical sections with consistent comments:
- Variables and Base Styles
- Layout Components (header, footer)
- Main Content Sections (features, testimonials)
- Utility Classes
- Dark Mode Styles
- Media Queries
Add section comments like this:
/* ========================================================================== 1. Variables and Base Styles ========================================================================== */ /* ========================================================================== 2. Layout Components ========================================================================== */index.html (5)
Line range hint
27-88: Consolidate Multiple<head>SectionsThere are multiple
<head>sections in the HTML document. According to HTML standards, there should only be one<head>element per document. Please consolidate the contents into a single<head>element to ensure proper HTML structure and avoid potential issues.
Line range hint
9-11: Avoid Including Multiple Versions of FontAwesomeThe document includes two different versions of FontAwesome CSS:
- Version 5.15.3 at lines 9-11
- Version 6.6.0 at lines 106-110
Including multiple versions can lead to CSS conflicts and unexpected behaviors. Please consolidate to use a single version of FontAwesome throughout the document.
Also applies to: 106-110
750-753: Consider Removing Commented-Out Code in Testimonials HeadingThe commented-out
display: inline-block;and duplicatepaddingproperties in.testimonials h2may clutter the CSS. If these styles are no longer needed, consider removing them to keep the stylesheet clean and maintainable.
781-806: Remove Unnecessary Commented-Out Styles in Testimonials SectionSeveral commented-out style rules within the
.testimonials h2selector, including hover effects and transformations, are present. Removing unused code can reduce clutter and improve maintainability.
Line range hint
27-820: Consolidate CSS Styles into External StylesheetMultiple
<style>elements are included within the HTML document, with some duplicated or conflicting CSS rules. To improve maintainability and reduce potential conflicts, consider consolidating the CSS into a single external stylesheet.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- index.html (9 hunks)
- style.css (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
index.html (7)
283-284: Updates to Features Section Styles Look GoodThe changes to the padding and background color in the
.featuresclass enhance the visual appearance of the Features section.
292-296: Ensure Consistent Styling for Feature CardsThe updates to the
.features-cardclass modify the background color, padding, border-radius, and width. Please verify that these changes maintain consistent styling across all feature cards and that they display correctly on various screen sizes.
321-321: Adjustment of Features Cards Gap Looks GoodIncreasing the gap between feature cards improves the spacing and visual appeal of the Features section.
332-332: Verify Features Card Width for ResponsivenessThe width of
.features-cardis set tocalc(100% - 30px), which may cause the cards to span the full width on larger screens. Ensure that the layout remains visually appealing and the cards are appropriately sized on different screen resolutions.
562-562: Adding Bold Font Weight to Features HeadingSetting
font-weight: bold;for.features h2enhances the prominence of the Features section heading.
629-630: Updates to Testimonials Section Styles Look GoodAdjustments to the padding and background color in the
.testimonialsclass improve the aesthetics of the Testimonials section.
643-643: Additional Padding for Testimonial CardsAdding
padding-bottom: 70px;ensures better spacing at the bottom of the Testimonials section, enhancing the layout.
| background-color: #ffffff; | ||
| /* Use off-white for testimonial cards */ | ||
| padding: 30px; | ||
| border-radius: 8px; | ||
| box-shadow: 0 4px 6px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); | ||
| box-shadow: 0 10px 10px rgba(247, 242, 242, 0.1); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider Enhancing Contrast for Testimonial Cards
The background-color of #ffffff on a #e4e3e3 background may result in low contrast between the testimonial cards and the background. Consider adjusting the background color or adding a more pronounced box-shadow to improve visual separation and accessibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
index.html (2)
Line range hint
1-1000: Critical: Fix duplicate HEAD tags and merge style blocksThe document structure has several critical issues:
- Multiple
<head>tags are present- Duplicate style blocks with overlapping selectors
- Redundant CSS rules
Consolidate all styles into a single style block within one
<head>section. Consider moving styles to an external CSS file for better maintainability.
Line range hint
1051-1066: Optimize scroll event handlingThe current progress bar implementation could impact performance. Consider:
- Using
requestAnimationFrameexplicitly- Implementing throttling for scroll event handler
function updateProgressBar() { const scrollTop = window.scrollY; const windowHeight = document.documentElement.scrollHeight - window.innerHeight; const scrollPercentage = (scrollTop / windowHeight) * 100; const progressBar = document.getElementById('progress-bar'); lastScrollPercentage += (scrollPercentage - lastScrollPercentage) * 0.1; progressBar.style.width = lastScrollPercentage + '%'; } -window.addEventListener('scroll', updateProgressBar); +let ticking = false; +window.addEventListener('scroll', () => { + if (!ticking) { + window.requestAnimationFrame(() => { + updateProgressBar(); + ticking = false; + }); + ticking = true; + } +});style.css (3)
Line range hint
1-3: Consolidate CSS variable declarations in:rootFor better maintainability and consistency, consider moving all CSS variable declarations into the
:rootselector at the beginning of the file. Currently, variables like--deep-teal,--off-white,--dark-slate, and--soft-goldare declared later in the stylesheet. Consolidating them enhances readability and makes theme management easier.
357-357: Remove commented-out code for a cleaner codebaseThe
border-bottomproperty is commented out. To keep the code clean and maintainable, it's advisable to remove unused code instead of commenting it out. Version control systems track changes, so you can retrieve it later if needed.Apply this diff:
- /* border-bottom: 2px solid #3f10ea; */ padding-bottom: 10px;
478-478: Remove commented-out code for a cleaner codebaseThe
border-topproperty is commented out in the media query. If it's no longer required, consider removing it to maintain a tidy codebase.Apply this diff:
- /* border-top: 0.1rem solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); */ clip-path: polygon(0 0, 100% 0, 100% 0, 0 0);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- index.html (11 hunks)
- style.css (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
index.html (2)
Line range hint
629-663: Approve: Improved visual hierarchy in testimonials sectionThe changes address the previous contrast concerns by:
- Using a distinct background color (#e4e3e3)
- Enhancing box shadow for better card separation
283-296: Verify responsive layout for feature cardsThe increased card width (55%) combined with the gap spacing might cause layout issues on different screen sizes. Consider using a more flexible grid system.
| background-color: #e4e3e3; | ||
| /* Changed from #ffffff to Off-White */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use CSS variables instead of hardcoded color values
In line 199, the background-color is set directly to #e4e3e3. To maintain consistency and simplify future updates, consider using the existing --off-white CSS variable or define a new one if it doesn't match. This approach promotes a cohesive theme and eases maintenance.
Apply this diff to use the CSS variable:
- background-color: #e4e3e3;
+ background-color: var(--off-white);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Pull Request for Resum-Resume 💡
Issue Title :
Closes: #issue number that will be closed through this PR
Describe the add-ons or changes you've made 📃
Give a clear description of what have you added or modifications made
Type of change ☑️
What sort of change have you made:
How Has This Been Tested? ⚙️
Describe how it has been tested
Describe how have you verified the changes made
Checklist: ☑️
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Style Updates
Bug Fixes