-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add checks of cell tag consistency in gmshio #3342
Open
pierricmora
wants to merge
15
commits into
FEniCS:main
Choose a base branch
from
pierricmora:PR_check_celltags_in_gmshio
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c1e8103
add checks of cell tag consistency in gmshio
pierricmora 35531da
RuntimeError rather than assert
pierricmora 8390cd4
Merge branch 'main' into PR_check_celltags_in_gmshio
jorgensd de4b5f6
Merge branch 'main' into PR_check_celltags_in_gmshio
jorgensd 6775c8a
Merge branch 'FEniCS:main' into PR_check_celltags_in_gmshio
pierricmora 97a2023
E501
pierricmora 37436e2
E713
pierricmora 24d087f
Merge branch 'main' into PR_check_celltags_in_gmshio
garth-wells 56f371c
Merge branch 'main' into PR_check_celltags_in_gmshio
jorgensd ffefa65
Merge branch 'main' into PR_check_celltags_in_gmshio
garth-wells 9b5fb55
Merge branch 'main' into PR_check_celltags_in_gmshio
jorgensd 3dafc47
ruff
pierricmora 4919588
Merge branch 'main' into PR_check_celltags_in_gmshio
pierricmora 4e8ad33
bug fix: read the appropriate key of topologies
pierricmora 815ee7f
typo
pierricmora File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be used to remove
gdim
from parameters. What about this simplification? @jorgensdThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure that is safe, as you might want: A flat manifold in some plane, i.e.
ref:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, good point. I'm not sure to understand in details what should be the desired behaviour here -- I guess you would expect 3 as output, and another method that does not exist but which could be named
gmsh.model.getTopologicalDimension()
to return 2, am I right?I think I am done with my code. Could you have a review?