Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TS migration] Migrate 'useKeyboardState.js' hook to TypeScript #29267

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Dec 29, 2023

Conversation

fvlvte
Copy link
Contributor

@fvlvte fvlvte commented Oct 11, 2023

Details

Migrated useKeyboardState hook and it's dependency to TypeScript.

Fixed Issues

$ #24941
$ #24955
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  • Click on profile icon from the main screen
  • Open profile
  • Click on display name
  • Focus first name field
  • Click on back arrow
  • The keyboard is closed by ScreenWrapper that is using useKeyboardState hook.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web-ff.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
web-chrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
web-safari.mov
Desktop
electron.mov
iOS
ios17.mov
Android
android.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@rezkiy37 rezkiy37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left comments.

src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Michael (Mykhailo) Kravchenko <[email protected]>
# Conflicts:
#	src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx
#	src/hooks/useKeyboardState.js
src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/withKeyboardState.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fvlvte fvlvte marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2023 08:35
@fvlvte fvlvte requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2023 08:35
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from situchan and removed request for a team December 4, 2023 08:35
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 4, 2023

@situchan Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Dec 4, 2023

Why is this No QA? Keyboard handling is important part of the app. Please add Test/QA step at least for one page affected by this change

@fabioh8010
Copy link
Contributor

@fvlvte Please add test steps for this one!

@fvlvte fvlvte changed the title [No QA][TS migration] Migrate 'useKeyboardState.js' hook to TypeScript [TS migration] Migrate 'useKeyboardState.js' hook to TypeScript Dec 7, 2023
@fvlvte
Copy link
Contributor Author

fvlvte commented Dec 7, 2023

Added steps @fabioh8010 @situchan for ScreenWrapper that is basically biggest user of this hook.

@fabioh8010
Copy link
Contributor

@situchan Bump

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

will review today. please merge main

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 22, 2023

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #24941 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

Copy link
Contributor

@situchan situchan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-approving to get engineer review

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from lakchote December 22, 2023 18:37
@VickyStash
Copy link
Contributor

@lakchote kind bump 🙂

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@situchan sorry for the bother, could you give this one quick test after @fvlvte syncs with main, its been two weeks since tested so I want to make sure nothing popped up since

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

testing

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

Tests well!

mountiny
mountiny previously approved these changes Dec 29, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fvlvte One comment, I think the TODO is too generic and also I see that its been in place for couple months so is it indeed still pending?

isKeyboardShown: boolean;
};

// TODO: Remove - left for backwards compatibility with existing components.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this still required, if so, can you link an issue/ PR which is tied to this?

@fvlvte
Copy link
Contributor Author

fvlvte commented Dec 29, 2023

@fvlvte One comment, I think the TODO is too generic and also I see that its been in place for couple months so is it indeed still pending?

Let me double check

@fvlvte
Copy link
Contributor Author

fvlvte commented Dec 29, 2023

So yes it's still used in 2 non-migrated JavaScript components

Issues:
#25151
#31981

cc: @mountiny

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@fvlvte Can you link #25151 in the comment there please?

@fvlvte
Copy link
Contributor Author

fvlvte commented Dec 29, 2023

Done @mountiny

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Appreciate it!

@mountiny mountiny merged commit b1c6883 into Expensify:main Dec 29, 2023
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@fvlvte fvlvte deleted the 24955-migrate-withKeyboardState-hoc branch December 30, 2023 00:48
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 2, 2024

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.21-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 4, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 1.4.21-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

1 similar comment
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 4, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 1.4.21-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 4, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 1.4.21-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants