-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Auto upgrade to autodiff_deferred in nested AD #1839
Merged
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6cff68a
WIP
michel2323 2f0677b
Merge branch 'main' into vs/interp
wsmoses 832f106
Merge branch 'main' into vs/interp
wsmoses 3f2b391
Upgrade non deferred to deferred
wsmoses 16365f8
cleanup
wsmoses d5740d4
Update Project.toml
wsmoses 456266b
cleanup nested AD example
wsmoses 07b6d2d
Merge branch 'main' into deferredup
wsmoses File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You must actually change the IR, I believe.
A simple version would be to just add to the Overlay Table a "autodiff" -> "autodiff_defereed"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I agree.
This allows
EnzymeInterpreter
to use the defferredautodiff
implementation instead of the usualautodiff
implementation automatically. I think that would work, since when an user callsautodiff(...)
it dispatches to the usualautodiff
implementation, which then kicks off the entire Enzyme compilation.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so one issue here is that we already receive a method table from GPUCompiler [e.g. for CUDA/etc]
Also I agree methodtable is cleaner, but the current code here does work [as also confirmed by CI]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am still surprised that this works... You are presenting conflicting information to the abstract interpreter. the CallInfo says one thing, and the IR says another. This may currently "work", but you might also encounter a situation where the code uses the IR as the source of truth.
That's why in my various attempts at something similar, during inlining I replace the IR with something else.