Enable flexible definitions of plant functional types (PFTs) #6433

thorntonpe · 2024-05-19T22:00:00Z

Introduce a new optional format for PFT physiology files (paramfile) that
allows user to specify a flexible number of PFTs, including additional
natural vegetation types and different numbers of crops. Backwards compatible
(BFB) with older style files.

New variables added in new format file:

climatezone (options are: 0 {nonspecific}, 1 {tropical}, 2 {temperate}, 3 {boreal}, 4 {arctic})
needleleaf (options are: 0, 1)
nfixer (options are: 0, 1)
nonvascular (options are: 0 {vascular}, 1 {moss}, 2 {lichen})
graminoid (options are: 0 {non-grass}, 1 {grass})
iscft (options are: 0 {natural PFT}, 1 {prognostic crop functional type})

Variables with expanded options in new format file:

woody (options are: 0{non-woody}, 1 {tree}, 2 {shrub})

Add 2 new tests for the user pft.
ERS.ELM_USRDAT.I1850CNPRDCTCBC.elm-usrpft_default_I1850CNPRDCTCBC
ERS.ELM_USRDAT.I1850CNPRDCTCBC.elm-usrpft_codetest_I1850CNPRDCTCBC

Thanks-to: Fengming Yuan ([email protected]), Ben Sulman ([email protected])
[BFB]

thorntonpe · 2024-05-19T22:03:40Z

This PR is passing all e3sm_land_developer tests on chrysalis against master baselines at hash dd32f0.
Two new tests are added to e3sm_land_developer suite. Those tests require a new paramfile and new datm7 files. I have copied those into the inputdata directory on chrysalis.

thorntonpe · 2024-05-20T12:16:30Z

There is a circleci: build failure for this PR, but I'm not able to interpret the details. It looks like a timeout problem.

thorntonpe · 2024-05-20T20:30:20Z

The new feature documentation page for this PR is on the Land group space on Confluence, at:
https://acme-climate.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/LAND/pages/4335861769/Arctic+PFTs+NGEE+Arctic+IM4

thorntonpe · 2024-06-10T16:10:54Z

@bishtgautam @bbye @rgknox - I'm hoping you can take a look at this PR and give me any feedback. Beth, this is the modification for flexible number and order of PFTs that I discussed earlier with you and Eva. Ryan, glad to get together to give you additional background if needed. This is part of the E3SM - NGEE Arctic coordination Epic. Thanks, Peter

rgknox · 2024-06-10T18:27:04Z

ok, I'll take a look @thorntonpe

rljacob · 2024-06-13T17:49:47Z

@bbye please review.

thorntonpe · 2024-06-21T18:48:22Z

@rgknox Based on our code review discussion on June 12, the ORNL NGEE Arctic group is planning to clean up the conditional deallocation / allocation at lines 297-306 in elm_initializeMod.F90, which also gets rid of a hard-coded mxpft_nc /= 24 reference. The new commit for those changes will be ready on this PR early next week.

We also discussed with you some confusing use of numpft, mxpft, maxpatch_pft variables in elm_varpar.F90 and elsewhere. After giving that more careful review, we think this is something that is best tackled as an E3SM/land group code cleanup issue. The NGEE Arctic team will open an issue related to that with some suggestions about how the E3SM team can modify the use of these variables.

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:04:24Z

components/elm/src/biogeochem/AllocationMod.F90

@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ subroutine Allocation1_PlantNPDemand (bounds, num_soilc, filter_soilc, num_soilp

         f5 = 0._r8 ! continued intializations from above

-         if (ivt(p) >= npcropmin) then ! skip 2 generic crops
+         if (iscft(ivt(p)) >= 1) then ! skip 2 generic crops


Could we replace "1" with a named constant that conveys the meaning of 1 here?

@rgknox there are a number of flags that are currently reals but are intended as logical (usually named is). In the spirit of getting this set up for a broader overhaul later on, I used iscft as an example and did the conversion throughout the code to a logical variable in the latest commit. That allows these kinds of tests to be of the form if (iscft(ivt(p))) then ..., or if (.not. iscft(ivt(p))) then ...
That seems like a clear approach for the logical flags. The use of multiple values for a flag like woody is going to take some additional thought and work, since it is sometimes used like if (woody > 1), which does not lend itself any better to a named value replacing the 1.
Hopefully this demonstration with iscft shows an acceptable path for future development, while allowing this PR to move ahead.

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:05:13Z

components/elm/src/biogeochem/AllocationMod.F90

@@ -2748,7 +2748,7 @@ subroutine Allocation3_PlantCNPAlloc (bounds            , &
                 npool_to_frootn(p) = cpool_to_frootc(p) / cnfr
                 npool_to_frootn_storage(p) = cpool_to_frootc_storage(p) / cnfr

-                 if (woody(ivt(p)) == 1._r8) then
+                 if (woody(ivt(p)) >= 1.0_r8) then


is woody a real?

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:07:06Z

components/elm/src/biogeochem/CH4Mod.F90

@@ -2563,8 +2563,7 @@ subroutine ch4_aere (bounds, &
                  is_vegetated = .false.
               end if

-               if (veg_pp%itype(p) == nc3_arctic_grass .or. crop(veg_pp%itype(p)) == 1 .or. &
-                    veg_pp%itype(p) == nc3_nonarctic_grass .or. veg_pp%itype(p) == nc4_grass) then
+               if (graminoid(veg_pp%itype(p)) == 1 .or. crop(veg_pp%itype(p)) == 1) then


same as comments related to comparisons with woody, can we compare this to a named constant instead of 1? Even if this is a integer acting as a logical, or a true logical, its better to compare to a named consant, like int_true or int_false.

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:08:56Z

components/elm/src/biogeochem/CNNitrogenFluxType.F90

@@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ subroutine Summary(this, bounds, num_soilc, filter_soilc, num_soilp, filter_soil
    ! !USES:
    use elm_varpar    , only: nlevdecomp,ndecomp_cascade_transitions,ndecomp_pools
    use subgridAveMod , only: p2c
-    use pftvarcon     , only : npcropmin 
+    use pftvarcon     , only : iscft


this can be removed since its not used, right?

Yes - removed in latest commit.

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:11:55Z

components/elm/src/biogeochem/CNPhenologyBeTRMod.F90

@@ -1893,13 +1894,17 @@ subroutine CropPhenologyInit(bounds)
    ! Convert planting dates into julian day
    minplantjday(:,:) = huge(1)
    maxplantjday(:,:) = huge(1)
-    do n = npcropmin, npcropmax


I see, so this is an example of added flexibility to where cfts are positioned in the list, we no longer rely on looping through the expected cft bounds, but go through all fts and check their iscft label...

Is it possible to remove the usage of npcropmin and npcropmax altogether, and remove it from pftvarcon?

That is something we can try to tackle in later PRs, focusing on code cleanup.

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:22:11Z

components/elm/src/biogeochem/CNCarbonStateType.F90

@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ subroutine InitCold(this, bounds, ratio, c12_carbonstate_vars)
                if (veg_vp%evergreen(veg_pp%itype(p)) == 1._r8) then
                   this%leafc_patch(p)         = 1._r8 * ratio
                   this%leafc_storage_patch(p) = 0._r8
-                else if (veg_pp%itype(p) >= npcropmin) then ! prognostic crop types
+                else if (iscft(veg_pp%itype(p)) >= 1) then ! prognostic crop types


the definition of iscft in pftvarcon only covers two types 0 and 1, is this ">=" prepping for a future condition? If the meaning of iscft expands to be non-binary, we should update the description in pftvarcon when this happens.

Nope, this was intended as binary. Now converted to that throughout the code. Thanks for the suggestion.

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:24:36Z

components/elm/src/biogeochem/VOCEmissionMod.F90

@@ -114,7 +110,7 @@ subroutine InitAllocate(this, bounds)
    ! !LOCAL VARIABLES:
    integer            :: i, imeg
    integer            :: class_num
-    real(r8)           :: factors(numpft)
+    real(r8)           :: factors(numveg)


is this a bug fix? The allocation space on this changed, but its usage did not.

Full range was not used previously.

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:27:42Z

components/elm/src/biogeophys/CanopyFluxesMod.F90

@@ -869,7 +869,8 @@ subroutine CanopyFluxes(bounds,  num_nolakeurbanp, filter_nolakeurbanp, &
            p = filterp(f)
            c = veg_pp%column(p)
            if(.not.veg_pp%is_fates(p)) then
-               if (veg_pp%itype(p) == nsoybean .or. veg_pp%itype(p) == nsoybeanirrig) then
+               ! soybean (crop with N fixation)
+               if (crop(veg_pp%itype(p)) >= 1 .and. nfixer(veg_pp%itype(p)) == 1) then


crop is still defined as a binary in pftvarcon:

E3SM/components/elm/src/main/pftvarcon.F90

Line 106 in 6ced7eb

real(r8), allocatable :: crop(:) !crop pft: 0. = not crop, 1. = crop pft

Can you update the definition since this can be larger than 1?

No plan for this to be greater than 1. This can be changed following the example of iscft, but would prefer to get it in a later PR.

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:29:51Z

components/elm/src/main/elm_varpar.F90

@@ -48,20 +48,23 @@ module elm_varpar
  integer, parameter :: ndst        =   4     ! number of dust size classes (BGC only)
  integer, parameter :: dst_src_nbr =   3     ! number of size distns in src soil (BGC only)
  integer, parameter :: sz_nbr      = 200     ! number of sub-grid bins in large bin of dust size distribution (BGC only)
-  integer, parameter :: mxpft       =  50     ! maximum number of PFT's for any mode;
+  !integer, parameter :: mxpft       =  50     ! maximum number of PFT's for any mode;
+  integer :: mxpft                  =  50     ! maximum number of PFT's for any mode;


shouldn't maxpft be a parameter constant?

mxpft is now updated by reading the pft physiology file.

Do all the physiology files need to be updated to read mxpft?

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:32:03Z

components/elm/src/main/elm_varpar.F90

  ! FIX(RF,032414) might we set some of these automatically from reading pft-physiology?
  integer, parameter :: numveg      =  16     ! number of veg types (without specific crop)
  integer, parameter :: nlayer      =   3     ! number of VIC soil layer --Added by AWang
  integer            :: nlayert               ! number of VIC soil layer + 3 lower thermal layers

-  integer :: numpft      = mxpft   ! actual # of patches (without bare), a total that spans LUs
+  integer :: numpft      =  50     ! actual # of patches (without bare), a total that spans LUs


Might be safer to initialize this to a nonsense number (a negative perhaps?), so that it crashes if there is some weird scenario where it does not get set, is it interpreted from reading in real data, right?

mxpft is set by reading in real data. numpft is still used as an upper limit. We are working out how to simplify this but I'd like to do it in a later PR - it is a long-standing tangle of usage that this PR makes a little better, but doesn't go all the way to cleaning up.

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:48:35Z

components/elm/src/main/surfrdUtilsMod.F90

@@ -123,34 +123,35 @@ subroutine convert_cft_to_pft( begg, endg, cftsize, wt_cft )
    !        a crop landunit, and put them on the vegetated landunit.
    ! !USES:


I was grepping through the code to see where we use this routine convert_cft_to_pft, to see if the changes would effect FATES somehow. But I don't see where this is called. Is it actually called anywhere?

It isn't called anywhere in the current code. It is a placeholder for future functionality.

rgknox · 2024-06-28T15:53:07Z

I gave a look through the code, somewhere between "thorough" and "almost thorough". I think I came up with some reasonable (and perhaps nit-picky) things to look over. In general, my take is that the code uses too many "magic numbers", ie comparing variables to hard-coded constants like "1" or "0". I feel it is fair to say that fixing that type of thing is out of scope for this PR, but it could be an opportunity to make things more transparent if you agree with me.

In general though, this PR is getting the code more flexible and robust since it breaks away from expecting an order to certain indices. Awesome stuff all.

thorntonpe · 2024-06-28T16:00:43Z

Thanks @rgknox for giving this a careful look. I agree with your suggestions, and I'll discuss with @fmyuan and @bsulman. They are working on an additional commit, and we should be able to get at least some of your requested changes wrapped into this PR.

bbye · 2024-06-28T16:33:15Z

I added some comments that I saw during my review. A couple other things I wanted to bring up. 1) it might be nice for @evasinha to look at the PR since there are a lot of changes to the crop indexing and she knows more about how perennial crops are handled. 2) the PR should be tested with the crop model configuration (including a test with 2-way irrigation using generic crops) to make sure it doesn't break anything. 3) I noticed that iscft is either 0 or 1, but most of the if statements used >=1. I think this is ok since it gives us freedom to later expand the crops a bit. I'm thinking we could have annual crops=1 and perennial crops=2. I'm not asking for that change in this PR, but keeping consistent use of >=1 for iscft would allow us to change that in the future.

bbye · 2024-06-28T16:11:42Z

components/elm/src/main/pftvarcon.F90

+
+                 ! NOTE: there is a misunderstanding in pft physiology parameter file: 'perennial crop' IS NOT 'crop',
+                 !       but still counted into 'numcft'
+                 if(percrop(i)==1) then


Does this mean that percrop has an iscft ==0?

No, percrop and iscft are independent.

bbye · 2024-06-28T16:13:49Z

components/elm/src/biogeochem/DryDepVelocity.F90

+            !if (elmveg == nc3crop                             ) wesveg = 2
+            !if (elmveg == nc3irrig                            ) wesveg = 2
+            !if (elmveg >= npcropmin .and. elmveg <= npcropmax ) wesveg = 2
+            if (crop(elmveg) == 1.0_r8 .or. iscft(elmveg) == 1.0_r8  ) wesveg = 2


Here and a few other places iscft ==1 but almost everywhere else, the use is iscft>=1? I think it would be good to be consistent with the notation.

Thanks -based on this and Ryan's comments I converted the iscft to a logical type in the latest commit.

bbye · 2024-06-28T16:14:53Z

components/elm/src/biogeochem/FireMod.F90

@@ -305,11 +305,12 @@ subroutine FireArea (bounds, &
           if (pi <=  col_pp%npfts(c)) then
              p = col_pp%pfti(c) + pi - 1
              ! For crop veg types
-              if( veg_pp%itype(p) > nc4_grass )then
+              if( crop(veg_pp%itype(p)) == 1 .or. iscft(veg_pp%itype(p)) == 1 )then


Another location where == is used instead of >= for iscft. Also see lines 335 and 511 in this subroutine.

I would like to go through and do the conversion to logical types for a couple of other variables, including crop(), in the same way the I have done for iscft(). I would like to hold off and bring that in with other code cleanup in another PR.

bbye · 2024-06-28T16:15:32Z

components/elm/src/biogeochem/VOCEmissionMod.F90

       get_map_EF = vocemis_vars%efisop_grc(5,g_in, ti_in)
-    else if (ivt_in >= nc3crop) then                   !crops
+    else if (crop(ivt_in) == 1 .or. iscft(ivt_in) == 1) then !crops


uses == instead of >= for iscft

bbye · 2024-06-28T16:20:27Z

components/elm/src/biogeophys/CanopyFluxesMod.F90

@@ -869,7 +869,8 @@ subroutine CanopyFluxes(bounds,  num_nolakeurbanp, filter_nolakeurbanp, &
            p = filterp(f)
            c = veg_pp%column(p)
            if(.not.veg_pp%is_fates(p)) then
-               if (veg_pp%itype(p) == nsoybean .or. veg_pp%itype(p) == nsoybeanirrig) then
+               ! soybean (crop with N fixation)
+               if (crop(veg_pp%itype(p)) >= 1 .and. nfixer(veg_pp%itype(p)) == 1) then


I'm a little worried about this change. This code is specific to soybean since it is drought tolerant. I worry if using an nfixer flag any future crops that are classified as nfixers would inadvertently be included in this call. Currently we don't have any other nfixers, but I don't know if that will change.

Good point. This suggests that what we want is a drought-tolerant flag for crops, or better yet a change to the photosynthesis parameters controlling btran. Let's put this on our list for testing and changes in a future PR.

bbye · 2024-06-28T16:29:45Z

components/elm/src/main/pftvarcon.F90

+             else if ( (max(iscft(i),crop(i)+percrop(i))) >= 1 .and. (nonvascular(i)+woody(i)+graminoid(i)) >= 1) then
+                print *, 'ERROR: Incorrect crop PFT flags: ', i, ' ', trim(pftname(i))
+                call endrun(msg=' ERROR: crop PFT cannot be any of nonvascular/woody/graminoid type - '//errMsg(__FILE__, __LINE__))
+             end if


We have some woody crops targeted for future versions of the model, so we might want more flexibility with the flags.

These error checks are very specific for the current usage of woody etc. I agree something more flexible would be good. Let's work on that together as a future PR.

thorntonpe · 2024-07-22T02:14:49Z

@rgknox and @bbye - based on latest two commits, and responses to your reviews, I'm hoping this PR can now be approved.

rgknox · 2024-07-22T18:18:46Z

done, thanks @thorntonpe

rljacob · 2024-07-25T17:38:43Z

@bbye please re-review.

bbye · 2024-08-02T16:45:13Z

I only had one comment/question about whether we need to update all the physiology files since mxpft is now being read in. I know this is backward compatible, I just wasn't sure about that. Otherwise, looks fine to merge.

thorntonpe · 2024-08-05T15:53:15Z

@bbye Thanks for the further review. The mxpft is being calculated by reading the entries in the file, and there is no requirement to add it as a variable or modify the existing physiology files.

Introduce a new optional format for PFT physiology files (paramfile) that allows user to specify a flexible number of PFTs, including additional natural vegetation types and different numbers of crops. Backwards compatible (BFB) with older style files. New variables added in new format file: - climatezone (options are: 0 {nonspecific}, 1 {tropical}, 2 {temperate}, 3 {boreal}, 4 {arctic}) - needleleaf (options are: 0, 1) - nfixer (options are: 0, 1) - nonvascular (options are: 0 {vascular}, 1 {moss}, 2 {lichen}) - graminoid (options are: 0 {non-grass}, 1 {grass}) - iscft (options are: 0 {natural PFT}, 1 {prognostic crop functional type}) Variables with expanded options in new format file: - woody (options are: 0{non-woody}, 1 {tree}, 2 {shrub}) Contributors: Code development: Fengming Yuan ([email protected]) Code development: Ben Sulman ([email protected]) [BFB]

This reverts commit 15b89e4, reversing changes made to bfcb4ee.

…codes, but NOT YET fully work. Two tests are actually similary as 'elm_usrdat' test, but with 42_FLUXNETSITES, so those 2 shall produce same outputs. The 3rd one, usrpft_arctic_I1850CNPRDCTCBC, is for testing an actual Arctic Site (See Sulman et al. 2021), however which would not produce same results as the paper because ELM developments in arctic PFT physiology not yet included. NOTE: there are a few needed inputs are included in each tests, which if not in $DIN_LOC_ROOT user can copy them into to allow it work.

NOTES for when user-defined: (1) explicitly define a few PFT properties (flags) as following: nonvasular (0, 1=moss, or 2=lichen); woody (0, 1=tree, or 2=shrub); needleleaf ( 0=broadleaf, or 1=needleleaf); graminoid ( 0=woody/crop/nonvascular, or 1=graminoid); generic_crop ( 0=non-crop/prognostic crop, 1=generic_crop. NOTE that this is for not having conflicts with crop module development). climatezone (0=not-specific, 1=tropical, 2=temperate, 3=boreal, or 4=arctic) (2) in case's env_run.xml, add ' -maxpft 12' in which 12 is an example number of pfts, in "ELM_BLDNML_OPTS'" like the following: <entry id="ELM_BLDNML_OPTS" value="-maxpft 12 -bgc bgc -nutrient cnp -nutrient_comp_pathway rd -soil_decomp ctc -methane -nitrif_denitrif"> <type>char</type> <desc>CLM build-namelist options</desc> </entry>

… parameter file.

…veg_pp. Only difference may be actual number of PFTs due to surface data 'natpft' length less than physiology parameter length ('npft'). So it's shall be exactly same by 'use pftvarcon, only: ', or by 'veg_pp%'. This commit try to use either in one code file of .F90.

…when flexible length pfts are user-provided, and/or surfdata 'lsmpft' dimension is less than 'pft' dimension in parameter file.

…oper in effect.

…ndexing may be not in need anymore.

This is a demonstration of how the same approach could be used for other flags that are used as logicals but allocated as reals or integers. [BFB]

…t (PR #6433) Introduce a new optional format for PFT physiology files (paramfile) that allows user to specify a flexible number of PFTs, including additional natural vegetation types and different numbers of crops. Backwards compatible (BFB) with older style files. New variables added in new format file: - climatezone (options are: 0 {nonspecific}, 1 {tropical}, 2 {temperate}, 3 {boreal}, 4 {arctic}) - needleleaf (options are: 0, 1) - nfixer (options are: 0, 1) - nonvascular (options are: 0 {vascular}, 1 {moss}, 2 {lichen}) - graminoid (options are: 0 {non-grass}, 1 {grass}) - iscft (options are: 0 {natural PFT}, 1 {prognostic crop functional type}) Variables with expanded options in new format file: - woody (options are: 0{non-woody}, 1 {tree}, 2 {shrub}) Thanks-to: Fengming Yuan ([email protected]), Ben Sulman ([email protected]) [BFB]

Introduce a new optional format for PFT physiology files (paramfile) that allows user to specify a flexible number of PFTs, including additional natural vegetation types and different numbers of crops. Backwards compatible (BFB) with older style files. New variables added in new format file: climatezone (options are: 0 {nonspecific}, 1 {tropical}, 2 {temperate}, 3 {boreal}, 4 {arctic}) needleleaf (options are: 0, 1) nfixer (options are: 0, 1) nonvascular (options are: 0 {vascular}, 1 {moss}, 2 {lichen}) graminoid (options are: 0 {non-grass}, 1 {grass}) iscft (options are: 0 {natural PFT}, 1 {prognostic crop functional type}) Variables with expanded options in new format file: woody (options are: 0{non-woody}, 1 {tree}, 2 {shrub}) Add 2 new tests for the user pft. ERS.ELM_USRDAT.I1850CNPRDCTCBC.elm-usrpft_default_I1850CNPRDCTCBC ERS.ELM_USRDAT.I1850CNPRDCTCBC.elm-usrpft_codetest_I1850CNPRDCTCBC Thanks-to: Fengming Yuan ([email protected]), Ben Sulman ([email protected]) [BFB]

rljacob · 2024-09-03T01:23:07Z

Merged to next after being removed by a reset of next.

thorntonpe added Land BFB PR leaves answers BFB labels May 19, 2024

thorntonpe assigned bishtgautam May 19, 2024

rljacob requested review from bbye and rgknox May 20, 2024 01:39

thorntonpe requested review from bishtgautam and removed request for bishtgautam May 20, 2024 15:45

rgknox reviewed Jun 28, 2024

View reviewed changes

bbye reviewed Jun 28, 2024

View reviewed changes

rgknox approved these changes Jul 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

bbye approved these changes Aug 5, 2024

View reviewed changes

bishtgautam added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2024

Revert "Merge branch 'thorntonpe/lnd/IM4' into next (PR #6433)"

52b5425

This reverts commit 15b89e4, reversing changes made to bfcb4ee.

fmyuan and others added 15 commits August 26, 2024 22:24

Allow namelist 'maxpft' workable for natural-PFT parameter data read.

08c89da

Distinguish woody types between tree (1) and shrub (2).

a8b486b

avoid using hard coded PFT total number and indices in PFT physiology…

475eac8

… parameter file.

Fix of possible bugs in surfrdMod.F90

a0765f2

Make natpft patch and croppft patch are merged correctly, especially …

c5afb34

…when flexible length pfts are user-provided, and/or surfdata 'lsmpft' dimension is less than 'pft' dimension in parameter file.

Edit added 'usrpft_codetest_I1850CNPRDCTCBC' test for e3sm_land_devel…

d01128e

…oper in effect.

(optional) Vcmax25 at top canopy for each PFT is as an output variable.

1cd6dff

crop and perenial crop pft flag, 'iscft', is added so that crop pft i…

92077c1

…ndexing may be not in need anymore.

Bug fix to remove topi, topf and use max_topounits, plus cleanup

0dcb165

Move a few array allocations to after pftconrd(). (#6)

ee81916

Convert iscft() from real(r8) to logical.

d216481

This is a demonstration of how the same approach could be used for other flags that are used as logicals but allocated as reals or integers. [BFB]

Fixes a bug, uninitialized variable in pftvarcon

0f841e6

thorntonpe force-pushed the thorntonpe/lnd/IM4 branch from 4d622ce to 0f841e6 Compare August 27, 2024 02:28

bishtgautam merged commit 5559a57 into E3SM-Project:master Sep 3, 2024
21 checks passed

		@@ -123,34 +123,35 @@ subroutine convert_cft_to_pft( begg, endg, cftsize, wt_cft )
		! a crop landunit, and put them on the vegetated landunit.
		! !USES:

Enable flexible definitions of plant functional types (PFTs) #6433

Enable flexible definitions of plant functional types (PFTs) #6433

Conversation

thorntonpe commented May 19, 2024 • edited by rljacob Loading

thorntonpe commented May 19, 2024

thorntonpe commented May 20, 2024

thorntonpe commented May 20, 2024

thorntonpe commented Jun 10, 2024

rgknox commented Jun 10, 2024

rljacob commented Jun 13, 2024

thorntonpe commented Jun 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

rgknox commented Jun 28, 2024

thorntonpe commented Jun 28, 2024

bbye commented Jun 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

thorntonpe commented Jul 22, 2024

rgknox commented Jul 22, 2024

rljacob commented Jul 25, 2024

bbye commented Aug 2, 2024

thorntonpe commented Aug 5, 2024

rljacob commented Sep 3, 2024

thorntonpe commented May 19, 2024 •

edited by rljacob

Loading