-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add priority queueing for Mutex and Semaphore #75
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b64a203
Draft interface for priority-queuing feature
cdb2725
Stub unit tests for priority queue
f40a465
Add unused nice variable 'nice' to function definitions
f50ee83
Implement basic queuing for 'Semaphore.acquire'
3e34bcc
Use priority instead of weight to determine execution order
be76be2
Implement nice behavior for Semaphore.runExclusive
fd097a7
Add coverage for immediate dispatch case
b1a38fc
Implement Semaphore.waitForUnlock
87f7238
Fix bug in timing of mid-priority waiters
2b11b72
Rename 'nice' to 'priority'
90d1092
Switch up test init order to exercise a branch
dmurvihill aeeae18
Add priority to Mutex.acquire
dmurvihill 8711a6d
Add priority to Mutex.runExclusive and waitForUnlock
dmurvihill 7aacdc7
Polish PR
dmurvihill 6a55acb
Add failing test for crowd-out condition
dmurvihill c546c3f
Merge branch 'master' into priority
dmurvihill 2d13278
Reverse findIndex for queuing tasks in acquire()
dmurvihill 981554f
Fix test name
dmurvihill 4350d80
Reverse findIndex for queuing tasks in waitForUnlock()
dmurvihill 285229f
Remove redundant instructions
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This loop will stop scanning the queue if the next item has a weight that exceeds the current value, even if there are other items further up in the queue that could be scheduled. You need to keep scanning through the whole queue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would allow light low-priority items to crowd out heavier high-priority items. The queue could not guarantee eventual completion of a high-priority item.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, you have a point there. I still don't like that a single heavy task can forever block all lower priority tasks, but I don't see a good way out either. Let's leave it like that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Opened a separate pull request with a test to clarify this issue.