Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove python2-only spec for pika client #19401

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Remove python2-only spec for pika client #19401

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

iliakur
Copy link
Contributor

@iliakur iliakur commented Jan 15, 2025

What does this PR do?

Motivation

We don't need the python2 spec anymore

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

@iliakur iliakur requested a review from a team as a code owner January 15, 2025 10:57
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.59%. Comparing base (a157eae) to head (41594ef).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
activemq ?
cassandra ?
hive ?
hivemq ?
hudi ?
ignite ?
jboss_wildfly ?
kafka ?
presto ?
rabbitmq 95.59% <ø> (ø)
solr ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@iliakur iliakur added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 15, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 86287a5 Jan 15, 2025
33 checks passed
@iliakur iliakur deleted the ik/remove-py2-pika branch January 15, 2025 11:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants