Fix typos and punctuation issues across multiple files #854
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@Dimitrolito is attempting to deploy a commit to the Infura Web Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
jlwllmr
requested changes
Nov 27, 2024
| @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Data about the transaction and the state of the network at its time of execution | |||
| in **traces**, an output of part of the sequencer called the [trace generator](../stack/sequencer/traces-generator.md). | |||
|
|
|||
| Traces are passed to the state manager block-by-block and then used to update the network state. | |||
| Once state is up to date, you'll see the transaction reflected and confirmed in your wallet. | |||
| Once state is up-to-date, you'll see the transaction reflected and confirmed in your wallet. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| Once state is up-to-date, you'll see the transaction reflected and confirmed in your wallet. | |
| Once state is up to date, you'll see the transaction reflected and confirmed in your wallet. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The existing usage was correct. It should only be hyphenated when modifying a noun, which it isn't doing in this instance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
both forms seem valid, but it seems like brand-new tends to reflect US usage better, so we'll go with that.
| @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ This is a computational entity or service that provides information or answers t | |||
|
|
|||
| ### Optimistic rollup | |||
|
|
|||
| A rollup of transactions that use [fraud proofs](#fraud-proof) to offer increased [L2](#layer-2) transaction throughput while using the security provided by Mainnet ([L1](#layer-1)). Unlike Plasma, a similar [L2](#layer-2) solution, optimistic rollups can handle more complex transaction types – anything possible in the EVM. However, in order to release assets back on the L1, users must wait for a 7 day challenge period. Liquidity providers can help alleviate distributing L1 ETH immediately, but this relies on trust in the security of the provider, and doesn't provide a mechanism for transferring NFTs. | |||
| A rollup of transactions that use [fraud proofs](#fraud-proof) to offer increased [L2](#layer-2) transaction throughput while using the security provided by Mainnet ([L1](#layer-1)). Unlike Plasma, a similar [L2](#layer-2) solution, optimistic rollups can handle more complex transaction types – anything possible in the EVM. However, in order to release assets back on the L1, users must wait for a 7-day challenge period. Liquidity providers can help alleviate distributing L1 ETH immediately, but this relies on trust in the security of the provider, and doesn't provide a mechanism for transferring NFTs. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| A rollup of transactions that use [fraud proofs](#fraud-proof) to offer increased [L2](#layer-2) transaction throughput while using the security provided by Mainnet ([L1](#layer-1)). Unlike Plasma, a similar [L2](#layer-2) solution, optimistic rollups can handle more complex transaction types – anything possible in the EVM. However, in order to release assets back on the L1, users must wait for a 7-day challenge period. Liquidity providers can help alleviate distributing L1 ETH immediately, but this relies on trust in the security of the provider, and doesn't provide a mechanism for transferring NFTs. | |
| A rollup of transactions that use [fraud proofs](#fraud-proof) to offer increased [L2](#layer-2) transaction throughput while using the security provided by Mainnet ([L1](#layer-1)). Unlike Plasma, a similar [L2](#layer-2) solution, optimistic rollups can handle more complex transaction types – anything possible in the EVM. However, in order to release assets back on the L1, users must wait for a seven-day challenge period. Liquidity providers can help alleviate distributing L1 ETH immediately, but this relies on trust in the security of the provider, and doesn't provide a mechanism for transferring NFTs. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request addresses minor typos, punctuation errors, and formatting issues in several documentation files. The changes improve readability and ensure grammatical consistency. Below are the key fixes applied:
These edits enhance the overall clarity and consistency of the documentation.