[IGNORE]

[hussam789]

PR Type

Enhancement, Documentation

---

Description

• Added bot detection logic for usernames and PR descriptions.

• Enhanced bot user identification in GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.

• Updated Jira Data Center/Server documentation with new authentication methods.

• Improved modularity by introducing utility functions for bot detection.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	utils.py Introduced utility functions for bot detection                      pr_agent/git_providers/utils.py Added is_user_name_a_bot function to detect bot-like usernames. Added is_pr_description_indicating_bot function to detect bot-like PR descriptions. +19/-0    bitbucket_app.py Improved bot user detection in Bitbucket                                  pr_agent/servers/bitbucket_app.py Integrated bot detection for usernames and PR descriptions. Enhanced is_bot_user logic to utilize new utility functions. +12/-1    github_app.py Enhanced bot user detection in GitHub                                        pr_agent/servers/github_app.py Enhanced is_bot_user logic with PR description checks. Integrated new utility functions for bot detection. +16/-6    gitlab_webhook.py Enhanced bot user detection in GitLab                                        pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py Improved bot detection logic using utility functions. Added PR description checks for bot identification. +7/-3
Documentation	fetching_ticket_context.md Updated Jira Data Center/Server authentication documentation docs/docs/core-abilities/fetching_ticket_context.md Updated Jira Data Center/Server section with new authentication methods. Added detailed steps for Local App Authentication. Retained support for Personal Access Token (PAT) Authentication. +37/-2

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🏅 Score: 85

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Bot Detection Coverage The bot detection patterns might need expansion to cover more cases. Consider adding patterns for other common bot naming conventions and automated PR descriptions. bot_indicators = ['codium', 'bot_', 'bot-', '_bot', '-bot', 'qodo', "service", "github", "jenkins", "auto", "cicd", "validator", "ci-", "assistant", "srv-"] return any(indicator in name.lower() for indicator in bot_indicators) Error Handling The bot detection logic could benefit from more specific error handling and logging to help diagnose issues in production. def is_bot_user(sender, sender_type, user_description): try: # logic to ignore PRs opened by bot if get_settings().get("GITHUB_APP.IGNORE_BOT_PR", False): if sender_type.lower() == "bot": if 'pr-agent' not in sender: get_logger().info(f"Ignoring PR from '{sender=}' because it is a bot") return True if is_user_name_a_bot(sender): get_logger().info(f"Ignoring PR from '{sender=}' because it is a bot") return True # Ignore PRs opened by bot users based on their description if isinstance(user_description, str) and is_pr_description_indicating_bot(user_description): get_logger().info(f"Description indicates a bot user: {sender}", artifact={"description": user_description}) return True except Exception as e: get_logger().error(f"Failed 'is_bot_user' logic: {e}") return False

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Improve bot detection accuracy by preventing false positives from short, common substrings Add a length check for the bot indicators to avoid false positives with short words like 'auto' that might appear in legitimate usernames. Consider requiring a minimum length or using word boundaries. pr_agent/git_providers/utils.py [109-111] -bot_indicators = ['codium', 'bot_', 'bot-', '_bot', '-bot', 'qodo', "service", "github", "jenkins", "auto", +bot_indicators = ['codium', 'bot_', 'bot-', '_bot', '-bot', 'qodo', "service", "github", "jenkins", "cicd", "validator", "ci-", "assistant", "srv-"] -return any(indicator in name.lower() for indicator in bot_indicators) +name_lower = name.lower() +return any(indicator in name_lower and (len(indicator) > 4 or indicator.startswith(('bot', 'ci-', 'srv-'))) + for indicator in bot_indicators) Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion addresses a significant issue where short common words like 'auto' could lead to false positives in bot detection, potentially blocking legitimate users. The improved implementation adds length checks and word boundary considerations.	8
	Add null check for sender type to prevent potential runtime errors The case-sensitive comparison of sender_type with "Bot" could miss bot detection - use case-insensitive comparison as done in the rest of the codebase. pr_agent/servers/github_app.py [245] -if sender_type.lower() == "bot": +if sender_type and sender_type.lower() == "bot": Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding a null check for sender_type is important to prevent potential runtime errors, as the sender_type parameter could be None in some cases. This improves the robustness of the bot detection logic.	7
	Add type validation to prevent runtime errors from invalid input types Add input validation for the description parameter to handle non-string inputs that might be passed from the various server implementations. pr_agent/git_providers/utils.py [114-116] def is_pr_description_indicating_bot(description: str) -> bool: - if not description: + if not description or not isinstance(description, str): return False Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion adds important type validation to prevent runtime errors when non-string inputs are passed to the function, making the code more robust and defensive against invalid inputs.	7

• Author self-review: I have reviewed the PR code suggestions, and addressed the relevant ones.