Add unit tests and enhance PR help message functionality

[mrT23]

PR Type

Tests, Enhancement

---

Description

• Added unit tests for extract_header function in test_pr_help_message.py.
• Added unit tests for PRHelpMessage class initialization and run method without OpenAI key.
• Added pytest-asyncio to requirements.txt to support asynchronous tests.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Tests	test_pr_help_message.py Add unit tests for PR help message functionality                  tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py Added unit tests for extract_header function. Added unit tests for PRHelpMessage class initialization. Added unit tests for PRHelpMessage class run method without OpenAI key. +66/-0
Dependencies	requirements.txt Add pytest-asyncio to requirements                                              requirements.txt Added pytest-asyncio dependency. +1/-0

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

(Review updated until commit 276a869)

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🏅 Score: 95

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Test Coverage The test cases cover basic functionality but could be enhanced by testing error cases and edge cases for the extract_header function Mock Validation The test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key test could validate the exact error message content to ensure proper user communication

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit 2f746cc)

Action: build-and-test

Failed stage: Build dev docker [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed due to a dependency conflict during the installation of Python packages: The package pr-agent version 0.2.4 requires pytest version 7.4.0. The package pytest-asyncio version 0.24.0 requires pytest to be between versions 8.2 and 9. These conflicting requirements for pytest make it impossible to resolve dependencies, leading to a failure in the package installation process.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 1018: #12 15.41 Downloading PyJWT-2.10.1-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (4.0 kB) 1019: #12 15.45 Collecting pynacl>=1.4.0 (from PyGithub==1.59.*->pr-agent==0.2.4) 1020: #12 15.45 Downloading PyNaCl-1.5.0-cp36-abi3-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.manylinux_2_24_x86_64.whl.metadata (8.6 kB) 1021: #12 15.51 Collecting iniconfig (from pytest==7.4.0->pr-agent==0.2.4) 1022: #12 15.51 Downloading iniconfig-2.0.0-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (2.6 kB) 1023: #12 15.55 Collecting pluggy<2.0,>=0.12 (from pytest==7.4.0->pr-agent==0.2.4) 1024: #12 15.55 Downloading pluggy-1.5.0-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (4.8 kB) 1025: #12 15.58 INFO: pip is looking at multiple versions of pytest-asyncio to determine which version is compatible with other requirements. This could take a while. 1026: #12 15.87 ERROR: Cannot install pr-agent and pr-agent==0.2.4 because these package versions have conflicting dependencies. ... 1028: #12 15.87 The conflict is caused by: 1029: #12 15.87 pr-agent 0.2.4 depends on pytest==7.4.0 1030: #12 15.87 pytest-asyncio 0.24.0 depends on pytest<9 and >=8.2 1031: #12 15.87 1032: #12 15.87 To fix this you could try to: 1033: #12 15.87 1. loosen the range of package versions you've specified 1034: #12 15.87 2. remove package versions to allow pip attempt to solve the dependency conflict 1035: #12 15.87 1036: #12 15.87 ERROR: ResolutionImpossible: for help visit https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/topics/dependency-resolution/#dealing-with-dependency-conflicts 1037: #12 15.88 1038: #12 15.88 [notice] A new release of pip is available: 24.0 -> 24.3.1 1039: #12 15.88 [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip 1040: #12 ERROR: process "/bin/sh -c pip install . && rm pyproject.toml requirements.txt" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1 1041: ------ 1042: > [base 6/6] RUN pip install . && rm pyproject.toml requirements.txt: 1043: 15.87 pytest-asyncio 0.24.0 depends on pytest<9 and >=8.2 1044: 15.87 1045: 15.87 To fix this you could try to: 1046: 15.87 1. loosen the range of package versions you've specified 1047: 15.87 2. remove package versions to allow pip attempt to solve the dependency conflict 1048: 15.87 1049: 15.87 ERROR: ResolutionImpossible: for help visit https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/topics/dependency-resolution/#dealing-with-dependency-conflicts ... 1054: Dockerfile:7 1055: -------------------- 1056: 5 | ADD requirements.txt . 1057: 6 | ADD docs docs 1058: 7 | >>> RUN pip install . && rm pyproject.toml requirements.txt 1059: 8 | ENV PYTHONPATH=/app 1060: 9 | 1061: -------------------- 1062: ERROR: failed to solve: process "/bin/sh -c pip install . && rm pyproject.toml requirements.txt" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1 1063: ##[error]buildx failed with: ERROR: failed to solve: process "/bin/sh -c pip install . && rm pyproject.toml requirements.txt" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[hussam789]

/help how to do a custom label in PR Agent?

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

Question:

how to do a custom label in PR Agent?

Answer:

There are 3 ways to enable custom labels in Qodo Merge (PR-Agent):

1. CLI (local configuration file):
   Edit the custom_labels.toml file with your custom labels and their descriptions.

2. Repo configuration file:
   Add custom labels configuration to the local .pr_agent.toml file:

[config]
enable_custom_labels=true

[custom_labels."Custom Label Name"] 
description = "Description of when AI should suggest this label"

3. Repo's labels page (Pro feature):

• Go to repo's labels page (GitHub/GitLab)
• Add custom labels with description prefixed by "pr_agent:"
• Format: Label name + "pr_agent: Description of when AI should suggest this label"

The custom labels will be used by both the dedicated /generate_labels tool and the describe tool.

Relevant Sources:

• https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai//tools/custom_labels#overview
• https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai//tools/custom_labels#how-to-enable-custom-labels
• https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai//tools/describe#overview

[coditamar]

/ask does it make sense that the test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key() doesn't have asserts?

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

Ask❓

does it make sense that the test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key() doesn't have asserts?

Answer:

Yes, it makes sense that the test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key() function doesn't have traditional asserts. Instead, it uses mock_git_provider.publish_comment.assert_called_once_with(...) to verify that the expected behavior occurs when there is no OpenAI API key. This is a common pattern in unit tests that involve mocking, where the test checks that certain methods are called with expected arguments, rather than asserting on return values or state changes. This approach is appropriate for testing interactions with mocked objects.

[mrT23]

/improve

[mrT23]

/describe
--pr_description.generate_ai_title=true

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Description updated to latest commit (276a869)

• Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

[mrT23]

/review

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

Persistent review updated to latest commit 276a869

[mrT23]

/review
auto_approve

[mrT23]

PR Description updated to latest commit (276a869)

• Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

[mrT23]

Preparing PR description...

[mrT23]

Preparing PR description...

[mrT23]

Preparing PR description...

[mrT23]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to 276a869

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Enhance error handling for missing OpenAI API key scenarios Add error handling in test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key to manage cases where the OpenAI API key is not provided, preventing runtime errors. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [62] -await help_msg.run() +try: + await help_msg.run() +except KeyError: + # Handle missing OpenAI key Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion is valuable as it addresses potential runtime errors due to missing configuration, enhancing the robustness and reliability of the test.	7
General	Ensure complete initialization validation of PRHelpMessage properties Modify the test_pr_help_message_init to check for proper initialization of all properties of PRHelpMessage, including edge cases for args. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [41] assert help_msg.question_str == "test question" +assert help_msg.args == ["test", "question"] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 2 Why: The suggestion is valid in encouraging more thorough testing, but the improved code does not reflect a significant change or improvement, as it only adds an assertion that is not directly related to the initialization process.	2

---

Previous suggestions

Suggestions up to commit 276a869

Category	Suggestion	Score
General	Add test cases for edge cases and invalid inputs to ensure robust error handling Add error handling for invalid input in extract_header() test cases. The current test assumes the input will always be well-formed with valid string content. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [8-11] def test_extract_header(): # Test with valid header snippet = "Header 1: Test\n===Snippet content===" assert extract_header(snippet) == "#test" + + # Test with invalid input + assert extract_header("") == "" + assert extract_header(None) == "" Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding test cases for edge cases like empty strings and None values is important for ensuring the extract_header() function handles invalid inputs gracefully and prevents potential runtime errors.	7
	Ensure proper cleanup of mock objects after test execution to prevent test interference Add cleanup or teardown steps after the test to reset the mock's state and ensure test isolation. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [50-53] @pytest.mark.asyncio @patch("pr_agent.tools.pr_help_message.get_git_provider_with_context") @patch("pr_agent.tools.pr_help_message.get_settings") async def test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key(mock_get_settings, mock_get_provider, mock_git_provider): + try: + # Test content... + finally: + mock_get_settings.reset_mock() + mock_get_provider.reset_mock() + mock_git_provider.reset_mock() Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3 Why: While cleaning up mocks is good practice, pytest automatically handles mock cleanup between tests, so this suggestion provides limited value and is not strictly necessary.	3

Suggestions up to commit 276a869

Category	Suggestion	Score
General	Add test coverage for malformed input scenarios to ensure robust header extraction Add error handling for malformed headers to prevent potential issues with header extraction. The current implementation assumes headers are well-formed. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [8-11] def test_extract_header(): # Test with valid header snippet = "Header 1: Test\n===Snippet content===" assert extract_header(snippet) == "#test" + + # Test with malformed header + snippet = "Header 1 Test\n===Snippet content===" + assert extract_header(snippet) == "" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding test cases for malformed headers is important for ensuring the robustness of the header extraction function, as it helps prevent potential runtime errors and unexpected behavior in production.	7
	Include edge case testing for empty input to prevent potential runtime errors Add test case for empty string input in extract_header function to ensure proper handling of edge cases. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [8-11] def test_extract_header(): # Test with valid header snippet = "Header 1: Test\n===Snippet content===" assert extract_header(snippet) == "#test" + + # Test with empty string + assert extract_header("") == "" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Testing empty string input is a fundamental edge case that should be covered to ensure the function handles all possible inputs correctly, though slightly less critical than malformed header testing.	6

Suggestions up to commit 2f746cc

Category	Suggestion	Score
General	Strengthen test assertions to ensure proper handling of missing OpenAI API key scenario Add assertions to verify that the OpenAI key is None and that no other methods were called on the git provider besides publish_comment tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [61-66] # Test run with no OpenAI key await help_msg.run() +assert mock_get_settings.return_value.get.call_args_list[1][0][0] == "openai.api_key" mock_git_provider.publish_comment.assert_called_once_with( "The `Help` tool chat feature requires an OpenAI API key for calculating embeddings" ) +assert len(mock_git_provider.method_calls) == 1 Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion significantly improves test coverage by adding crucial assertions to verify the OpenAI key check and ensuring no unexpected git provider methods were called, making the test more robust and comprehensive.	8
	Add edge case testing for question string initialization Add test cases for invalid/empty question strings to verify error handling tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [38-42] # Test initialization with question help_msg = PRHelpMessage("test_url", args=["test", "question"], ai_handler=mock_ai_handler) assert help_msg.question_str == "test question" assert help_msg.git_provider == mock_git_provider +# Test with empty question +help_msg_empty = PRHelpMessage("test_url", args=[""], ai_handler=mock_ai_handler) +assert help_msg_empty.question_str == "" + +# Test with None question +help_msg_none = PRHelpMessage("test_url", args=None, ai_handler=mock_ai_handler) +assert help_msg_none.question_str == "" + Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion enhances test coverage by adding important edge cases for empty and None question strings, which are common scenarios that should be properly handled by the PRHelpMessage class.	7

[mrT23]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

[mrT23]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

[mrT23]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.