-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More Mutagen Testing Logs: Part I #74606
Conversation
"Unnecessary torchers" -> "torture"? |
I'll look them over soonish. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
General procedure stuff:
The way to set volunteer studies up is either awake studies with a mild sedative or under general anesthesia - you'd want a complete monitoring in either case and the option to switch over immediately. You'd also have somebody in the room to both support the poor sap and intervene if the weird science gets off the rails.
The volunteers might get fed a line about hallucinogens or whatever, and remember that most low-level mutations are purifiable - it is completely possible that XEDRA set the studies up with the expectation of being able to just turn them back afterwards before they ran into some unpurifiable traits.
Re: first log
- going with an awake study refer to oral sedation (anesthesia is something else), monitoring telemetry and Research Assistant Johnny Whatsisface being there - you can also do a later log where he's made head researcher and doesn't do the evil shit for extra points.
- subcutaneus + "under the epidermis"is redundant
- the snip about "3 times the size of normal papilla" is superfluous
- You don't need thermal imaging, you're doing on-subject monitoring
- Change the flow of the drama a bit - subject gets itchy, monitoring staff tries getting them to calm down, stuff gets hectic and Santana decides against additional sedation for "subjective data gathering" reasons. Include something about the monitoring staff protesting and refer to a scary external incident report / Admin inquiry / similar bureaucratspeak and Santana getting reprimanded to a dead-end / thrown in XEDRA jail.
- Have a snippet about post-study subject care - debrief, examination, that sort of stuff.
- The line about mental health of observation stuff is extremely on the nose. "Santana got reprimanded, study protocols amended, further human tests get more observers/scientist screening/whatever" would suffice.
I'll try to read the others later today, but it will be a piecemeal review.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. Please do not bump or comment on this issue unless you are actively working on it. Stale issues, and stale issues that are closed are still considered. |
Setting this as a draft to:
|
Spell checker encountered unrecognized words in the in-game text added in this pull request. See below for details. Click to expand
This alert is automatically generated. You can simply disregard if this is inaccurate, or (optionally) you can also add the new words to Hints for adding a new word to the dictionary
|
Closing as stale. If you wish to continue working on this, ping me to reopen. |
Summary
None
Purpose of change
Once upon a time, @GuardianDll mentioned they would like some more mutagen testing logs to complement the existing contingent. I here present an appetiser.
Describe the solution
I have added 2 fresh logs as well as, with Guardian's blessing, rewritten logs 1, 2, and 5 for the time being to establish formal consistency with these reports. I have also added conditional names to the report document; however, I have not made it use an EOC pop-up, though I believe this would be better, as touching variant IDs scares me and I don’t know how to do it in a manner that doesn’t cause the game to detonate.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I considered writing more logs before publishing this PR, but these documents, due to my own fault, take quite a long time to produce, and I am juggling them along with other work. As such, I thought it better to put something out there, both to get feedback on what I’ve written, if the style’s good, if the lore’s alright, if the snippets are trash, etc., and to start putting out small bundles at a time. If it is deemed better to change everything in a single PR to avoid a transitional period, I have no issues with putting this in draft until such time as I am able to replace all the pre-existing mutagen logs.
Testing
I’ve not tested the new logs in the game; however, they’re simple snippet additions.
Additional context
For reference, my grasp on biology extends to the mighty knowledge that animals have bones in them, so if anybody with actual knowledge finds something incongruently stupid (there’s probably a healthy selection) I will, obviously, change accordingly.
Also, thanks to @Venera3 for vetting my proof of concept and workshopping what these snippets should convey, information-wise, and what their overall mood should be.