add 60L tank recipe based on 100L tank #72256
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 60L tank smithing recipe based on 100L tank recipe
Consoleable
changed the title
github-actions
bot
added
[JSON]
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
added 60L tank smithing recipe based on 100L tank recipe
Summary
Content "60L tank recipe based on 100L tank"
Purpose of change
60L only had a welding recipe, whereas the 100L had a welding and smithing recipe
Describe the solution
added 60L tank smithing recipe, based on difference in dimensions. Rounded up for materials cost.
Describe alternatives you've considered
not adding one, cant see any reason why not. No obvious differences based on json flaggs. The 100L drum is sealed like the 60L tank
Testing
imported recipe, spawned materials, made tank
Additional context