Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added 60L tank recipe based on 100L tank recipe #72254

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Consoleable
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Content "60L tank recipe"

Purpose of change

100L tank had a recipe that used blacksmithing so i added one for the 60L tank

Describe the solution

uses 5 lumps or 20 chunks, based on the difference in dimensions of the 60L to the 100L tank, i rounded up in material's cost to be conservative.

Describe alternatives you've considered

not adding it, but i cant see any major differences in the 100L vs 60L tank descriptions for why they cant be made using the same techniques. we could also remove the 100L tank smithing recipe, but i generally dont advocate for removing content, so i added this recipe.

Testing

recipe works in local game

Additional context

@github-actions github-actions bot added [JSON] Changes (can be) made in JSON Items: Containers Things that hold other things astyled astyled PR, label is assigned by github actions labels Mar 8, 2024
@Consoleable Consoleable closed this Mar 8, 2024
@Consoleable Consoleable deleted the 60L-tank-smith branch March 8, 2024 22:57
@Maleclypse
Copy link
Member

Why did you delete? It looks like you needed to get the basic build label from passing the tests? Did you check what was failing? If it was unrelated you could have requested the test be kicked?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
astyled astyled PR, label is assigned by github actions Items: Containers Things that hold other things [JSON] Changes (can be) made in JSON
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants