Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

case: add post processors to get_storage() #7

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 1, 2023
Merged

case: add post processors to get_storage() #7

merged 8 commits into from
Dec 1, 2023

Conversation

ixje
Copy link
Member

@ixje ixje commented Nov 29, 2023

Add post processor arguments and helpers as described in #3 (review) and #3 (comment)

WIP
I can't seem to create a draft PR anymore without paying for a Team license

@ixje ixje changed the title (WIP) node: add post processors to get_storage() case: add post processors to get_storage() Nov 29, 2023
@ixje ixje requested a review from meevee98 November 29, 2023 11:07
@ixje
Copy link
Member Author

ixje commented Nov 29, 2023

@meevee98 in you mentioned #3 (comment)

Maybe we can include the simple processors (i.e. bytes to Integer, bytes to str, the default neo default serialization from bytes to array/map) in our package so the user can only import and use them

Do you mean StdLib.serialize and deserialize?

@meevee98
Copy link
Contributor

meevee98 commented Dec 1, 2023

@meevee98 in you mentioned #3 (comment)

Maybe we can include the simple processors (i.e. bytes to Integer, bytes to str, the default neo default serialization from bytes to array/map) in our package so the user can only import and use them

Do you mean StdLib.serialize and deserialize?

yes, I meant serialize and deserialize from StdLib in that quote

@ixje
Copy link
Member Author

ixje commented Dec 1, 2023

ok thanks. I've added the binary deserialize method as part of the storage module so it's easy to find.

@ixje ixje merged commit a4293c6 into master Dec 1, 2023
14 checks passed
@ixje ixje deleted the storage branch December 1, 2023 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants