Feature template deserialize #505
Conversation
PrzeG
requested review from
kagrski,
JimOverholt,
igosoft,
sbasan and
bboot2
as code owners
|
|
||
| def find_template_values( | ||
| template_definition: dict, | ||
| templated_values: dict = {}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's generally not recommended to instantiate mutable objects like dictionaries or lists as default parameter values in Python function signatures. This is because mutable default values are evaluated only once when the function is defined, and subsequent calls to the function will reuse the same object, potentially leading to unintended behavior.
| templated_values: dict = {}, | |
| templated_values: Optional[dict] = None, |
| from catalystwan.api.templates.device_variable import DeviceVariable | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def find_template_values( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The find_template_values function is integral to the UX2 transformation process. It's imperative to conduct thorough unit tests to ensure its reliability and accuracy. Testing should encompass both default Cisco models and fully populated models.
| for template in self.templates: | ||
| definition = template.template_definiton | ||
| with self.subTest(template_name=template.name): | ||
| parsed_values = find_template_values(definition) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address the underlying issues causing the test function to fail for our demo vManage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please consider to write this as unit test to not rely on having fully configured vManage and speed up test execution. This will also be useful since github workflows only run unit tests. (For now)
PrzeG
force-pushed
the
feature_template_deserialize
branch
from
ca08cfa to
062d3d9
Compare
ghost
mentioned this pull request
Pull Request summary:
Adjustments to Feature Template deserialization, adding proper support for nested values and correct field names
Description of changes:
Checklist: