Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non cell type markers #3

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Non cell type markers #3

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

marcovarrone
Copy link
Collaborator

It's possible to define non-cell-type markers in the configuration talbe. Those markers will not be used for cell type classification, but their intensity will be used to divide cells into positive or negative for that marker. This is a generalization of the previous implementation, that was specific for Ki67 (proliferation marker).

  • The configuration tables must contain a new column called Is_CellType_Marker that can be either TRUE or FALSE.
  • The plots will not include proliferating vs not proliferating, but marker+ vs marker-. The old proliferating cells are now Ki67+.
  • Neighborhood analyses does not require the --celltype_query_proliferation_status parameter anymore, but requires the the path to the configuration table using the parameter --channel_info_path.
  • Neighborhood analyses outputs plots and tables for cells negative for all markers, but also for cells positive for each marker individually. The file names also include the query cell type.

@danieletavernari
Copy link
Contributor

  • Handling case of one non-cell type marker in ClassifyCells_Analyses.R
  • set args.lymphomoids_to_process=='all' (instead of args.lymphomoids_to_process=='all[0]' - possibly depends on Python version?) in NeighbourhoodAnalyses.py

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants