We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
hi there,
i think there's a bug with the available_rnaseq_workflows() function--and i think i know what the problem is.
possible_workflows = files() %>% GenomicDataCommons::filter(~data_type == "Gene Expression Quantification" & data_type == "Gene Expression Quantification") %>% facet("analysis.workflow_type") %>% aggregations()
produces
> possible_workflows $`analysis.workflow_type` key doc_count 1 HTSeq - Counts 11571 2 HTSeq - FPKM 11571 3 HTSeq - FPKM-UQ 11571
which means that the return statement in the function
return(possible_workflows[["key"]])
returns NULL because one has to refer to $analysis.workflow_type.
$analysis.workflow_type
either of these replacements would work, and produce the intended return values!
> possible_workflows[['analysis.workflow_type']][['key']] [1] "HTSeq - Counts" "HTSeq - FPKM" "HTSeq - FPKM-UQ" > possible_workflows[[1]][['key']] [1] "HTSeq - Counts" "HTSeq - FPKM" "HTSeq - FPKM-UQ"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
hi there,
i think there's a bug with the available_rnaseq_workflows() function--and i think i know what the problem is.
produces
which means that the return statement in the function
return(possible_workflows[["key"]])
returns NULL because one has to refer to
$analysis.workflow_type
.either of these replacements would work, and produce the intended return values!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: