Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add license scan report and status #36

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fossabot
Copy link

@fossabot fossabot commented Oct 25, 2024

Your FOSSA integration was successful! Attached in this PR is a badge and license report to track scan status in your README.

Below are docs for integrating FOSSA license checks into your CI:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced new FOSSA status badges for enhanced visibility of open-source licensing compliance.
    • Added a dedicated License section to the README for improved clarity on licensing information.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the README.md file, specifically the addition of a new License section and two FOSSA status badges in different sizes. The existing Docker image size badge remains unchanged. The overall structure of the README is maintained, with a newline added at the end for proper formatting.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added two FOSSA status badges (standard and large) and a new License section; newline added at the end.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant README
    User->>README: View README.md
    README-->>User: Display content with badges
    User->>README: Check License section
    README-->>User: Show License information with FOSSA badge
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the README, bright badges gleam,
FOSSA's here, a licensing dream!
New sections added, all neat and fine,
Clarity shines, like a sunbeam's line.
Hopping with joy, we celebrate,
A clearer path, oh, isn't it great? 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)

1-1: Improve badge readability with proper spacing.

Add a space between the Docker Image Size and FOSSA Status badges for better readability.

-[![Docker Image Size](https://img.shields.io/docker/image-size/betterweb/service-base/latest)](https://hub.docker.com/r/betterweb/service-base)[![FOSSA Status](https://app.fossa.com/api/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2FBetterCorp%2Fbetter-service-base.svg?type=shield)](https://app.fossa.com/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2FBetterCorp%2Fbetter-service-base?ref=badge_shield)
+[![Docker Image Size](https://img.shields.io/docker/image-size/betterweb/service-base/latest)](https://hub.docker.com/r/betterweb/service-base) [![FOSSA Status](https://app.fossa.com/api/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2FBetterCorp%2Fbetter-service-base.svg?type=shield)](https://app.fossa.com/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2FBetterCorp%2Fbetter-service-base?ref=badge_shield)

FOSSA configuration appears to be missing

While FOSSA badges are present in the README, the repository lacks the necessary FOSSA configuration and CI integration. The following items need attention:

  • No .fossa.yml configuration file found
  • No FOSSA CLI integration detected in CI workflows
  • No FOSSA-related scripts in package.json
  • No other FOSSA-related files present in the repository
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-35: Verify FOSSA configuration setup.

While the badges are correctly added, let's verify if the FOSSA configuration is properly set up in the repository.


Let me try again with the correct command flags to search hidden files:


Let me try one more time with a corrected regex and additional checks:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for FOSSA configuration file and CI integration

# Test 1: Look for FOSSA configuration file
echo "Checking for FOSSA configuration file..."
fd -t f "^\.fossa\.(ya?ml|json)$"

# Test 2: Look for FOSSA CLI references in CI files
echo "Checking for FOSSA CLI integration in CI files..."
fd -t f "^\.github/workflows/.*\.(ya?ml|json)$" -x rg -l "fossa"
fd -t f "^\.circleci/.*\.(ya?ml|json)$" -x rg -l "fossa"
fd -t f "^\.travis\.yml$" -x rg -l "fossa"
fd -t f "^Jenkinsfile.*$" -x rg -l "fossa"

Length of output: 1275


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for FOSSA configuration file and CI integration with hidden files

# Test 1: Look for FOSSA configuration file
echo "Checking for FOSSA configuration file..."
fd -H -t f "^\.fossa\.(ya?ml|json)$"

# Test 2: Look for FOSSA CLI references in CI files
echo "Checking for FOSSA CLI integration in CI files..."
fd -H -t f "^\.github/workflows/.*\.(ya?ml|json)$" -x rg -l "fossa"
fd -H -t f "^\.circleci/.*\.(ya?ml|json)$" -x rg -l "fossa"
fd -H -t f "^\.travis\.yml$" -x rg -l "fossa"
fd -H -t f "^Jenkinsfile.*$" -x rg -l "fossa"

# Test 3: Look for FOSSA references in package.json scripts
echo "Checking for FOSSA in package.json scripts..."
rg '"scripts":\s*{[^}]*fossa[^}]*}' package.json

Length of output: 737


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Final check for FOSSA integration

# Test 1: Look for FOSSA configuration file
echo "Checking for FOSSA configuration file..."
fd -H -t f "^\.fossa\.(ya?ml|json)$"

# Test 2: Look for FOSSA CLI references in workflow files
echo "Checking GitHub Actions workflows..."
fd -H -t f "^\.github/workflows/" -x cat {} \; | grep -i "fossa"

# Test 3: Look for FOSSA in package.json
echo "Checking package.json..."
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
    cat package.json | grep -i "fossa"
fi

# Test 4: Look for any FOSSA-related files
echo "Checking for any FOSSA-related files..."
fd -H -t f "fossa" 

Length of output: 473

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between eeb9d95 and 2e232fe.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

32-32: LGTM!

The BrowserStack sponsor addition follows the existing format consistently.


34-35: LGTM!

The License section is well-placed and properly formatted with the FOSSA status badge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants