Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update "Ruby gems" article with aliases #99

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

esteluk
Copy link

@esteluk esteluk commented Feb 22, 2024

We've recently started using ruby alias versions in R&D to mitigate issues with versions on our CI where only the most recent patch version is available.

@arthurpalves suggested that this be incorporated into the existing "The better way with Ruby Gems" article.

This brief summary introduces the concept of Ruby version aliases and how to configure them, as well as touching on the advantages / disadvantages of taking this route.

What is this article about?

R:

Checklist:

  • I am added to the list of authors correctly.
  • All images used in the post is in the correct folder (assets/images/post/).
  • My article has been reviewed internally before opening this Pull Request.
  • I have not modified someone else's previously published articles.
  • I double checked my changes locally at http://127.0.0.1:4000/ after running bundle install && bundle exec jekyll serve.
  • My changes generate no new errors

We've recently started using ruby alias versions in R&D to mitigate
issues with versions on our CI where only the most recent patch
version is available.

This modification to the "The better way with Ruby Gems" article
introduces the concept of Ruby version aliases and how to configure
them, as well as touching on the advantages / disadvantages of taking
this route.
@esteluk esteluk requested a review from arthurpalves February 22, 2024 11:27
@esteluk esteluk requested a review from a team as a code owner February 22, 2024 11:27
Copy link
Member

@arthurpalves arthurpalves left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Vale is complaining about line 229, but other than that all good!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants