PPR Experiment #59
PPR Experiment #59
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to configuration files, component structures, and type annotations across various parts of the Next.js application. Key modifications include the introduction of type safety in configuration files, updates to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/_components/explore-projects.tsx (2)
1-4: Remove unnecessary React import and add type definitions.The explicit React import isn't needed in Next.js 13+ unless you're using React-specific features like
useState. Also, consider adding type definitions for better type safety.Apply this diff:
-import React from "react"; +import type { Project } from "../_types"; import { findAllProjects } from "../_queries"; import { ProjectCard } from "./project-card";
13-15: Add type safety to the project data.The project data is passed to ProjectCard without type checking. Add proper type annotations to ensure type safety.
Apply this diff:
- {allProjects.map((project) => ( + {allProjects.map((project: Project) => ( <ProjectCard key={project.id} project={project} /> ))}apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(root)/page.tsx (2)
Line range hint
15-24: Optimize prefetching with Promise.allThe three prefetch operations can be executed in parallel for better performance.
Consider this optimization:
- void api.tasks.getTasksOverTime.prefetch({ - projectId: id, - }); - - void api.tasks.getTaskPriorities.prefetch({ - projectId: id, - }); - - void api.tasks.getTaskStatuses.prefetch({ - projectId: id, - }); + void Promise.all([ + api.tasks.getTasksOverTime.prefetch({ projectId: id }), + api.tasks.getTaskPriorities.prefetch({ projectId: id }), + api.tasks.getTaskStatuses.prefetch({ projectId: id }) + ]);
Line range hint
28-30: Remove extra semicolon in JSXThere's an unnecessary semicolon after the ProjectDashboard component.
Apply this diff:
- <ProjectDashboard id={id} />; + <ProjectDashboard id={id} />apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/_components/UserProjects.tsx (2)
3-3: Consider relocating getUserProjects to a more appropriate location.The
getUserProjectsfunction is currently imported from the navbar/switcher component, which seems like an unusual location for this functionality. Consider moving it to a dedicated projects or user-related utility file for better code organization.
30-32: Handle empty project list state.The current implementation doesn't handle the case when
usersProjectsis empty. Consider adding a message for users who don't have any projects yet.Consider this improvement:
- usersProjects.map((project) => ( - <ProjectCard key={project.id} project={project} /> - )) + usersProjects.length > 0 ? ( + usersProjects.map((project) => ( + <ProjectCard key={project.id} project={project} /> + )) + ) : ( + <p className="col-span-full text-center text-muted-foreground"> + You haven't created any projects yet. + </p> + )apps/nextjs/src/middleware.ts (1)
34-34: Consider using a dedicated route for insufficient privileges.Redirecting to "/unverified" for non-admin users might be confusing as it suggests an unverified status rather than insufficient privileges.
Consider creating a dedicated "/unauthorized" or "/forbidden" route for better user experience and clearer error communication.
apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(root)/calendar/page.tsx (2)
Line range hint
19-89: Consider extracting event data fetching logic.The calendar events are currently hardcoded. Given this is a project calendar view, these events should likely be fetched based on the project context.
Consider refactoring to fetch events from your data source:
async function fetchProjectEvents(projectId: string) { // Implement your data fetching logic here return [/* events */]; } export default async function Page() { // Get projectId from params or context const events = await fetchProjectEvents(projectId); return ( <main className="max-h-screen px-10"> <Calendar events={events}> {/* ... rest of the component ... */} </Calendar> </main> ); }
Line range hint
21-34: Add type safety for events and colors.Consider adding stricter type definitions for the event objects and color options to prevent potential runtime errors.
Add a type definition for calendar events:
type CalendarEventColor = 'pink' | 'blue' | /* other valid colors */; interface CalendarEvent { id: string; start: Date; end: Date; title: string; color: CalendarEventColor; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
- apps/nextjs/next.config.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(auth)/sign-in/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(root)/calendar/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(root)/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(root)/permissions/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(tasks)/tasks/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/_components/UserProjects.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/_components/explore-projects.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/_components/project-card.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/admin/page.tsx (0 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/loading.tsx (0 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/lib/auth.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/nextjs/src/middleware.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/website/next.config.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/website/package.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/admin/page.tsx
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/loading.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/nextjs/src/app/(auth)/sign-in/page.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (16)
apps/nextjs/src/lib/auth.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM! Imports are correctly structured.The imports are well-organized and all dependencies are necessary for the authentication functionality.
6-14: Verify cache behavior with auth state changes.While using
cachecan improve performance, be cautious about potential stale authentication states. The cache is request-scoped in Server Components, but verify that this doesn't affect real-time session updates.Run this script to verify cache usage across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that
cacheis used consistently across the codebase, particularly for server-side data fetching and authentication. The auth implementation inpackages/auth/src/index.rsc.tsshows that the baseauth()function itself is already cached usingcache(defaultAuth). Since React'scachefunction is request-scoped, this implementation is safe as:
- The cache is reset for each new request
- The authentication state cannot become stale within a single request
- Multiple calls to
checkAuth()within the same request will reuse the cached value, which is efficientThe caching implementation for authentication is correctly implemented
The current implementation follows React's server component caching best practices. The cache wrapper on
checkAuthis appropriate since:
- It's built on top of an already cached
auth()function- The cache is request-scoped, preventing stale authentication states
- It provides performance benefits by avoiding redundant auth checks within the same request
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other cached authentication-related functions # and potential cache invalidation points rg -A 3 "cache\(" # Look for session-related state management ast-grep --pattern 'session = await auth()'Length of output: 2569
apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(tasks)/tasks/page.tsx (2)
Line range hint
11-28: LGTM!The rest of the implementation looks good:
- Proper error handling with empty array checks
- Clean component structure
- Appropriate use of dynamic rendering directive
4-9:⚠️ Potential issueRemove Promise type from params as it conflicts with Next.js conventions.
The params object in Next.js pages is synchronously available and shouldn't be typed as a Promise. This change introduces unnecessary async overhead and deviates from Next.js routing conventions.
Apply this diff to fix the type annotation:
export default async function Page({ params, }: { - params: Promise<{ id: string }>; + params: { id: string }; }) { - const id = (await params).id; + const id = params.id;The async function can remain as it's needed for the API call, but the params handling should be synchronous.
Let's verify this pattern in other Next.js pages:
apps/website/next.config.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Good addition of type safety.Adding type annotations to the Next.js config improves maintainability and catches potential configuration errors at compile time.
apps/nextjs/next.config.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Good addition of type safety.Adding the NextConfig type import enhances type checking and IDE support.
8-8: LGTM! Type annotation improves configuration safety.The NextConfig type annotation ensures the configuration object strictly adheres to Next.js's expected structure.
apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/_components/project-card.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.The imports follow a good organization pattern: React core, Next.js components, and then custom UI components.
7-46: Verify integration with parent components.Let's verify how this component is integrated within UserProjects and ExploreProjects components to ensure consistent usage.
✅ Verification successful
Integration with parent components is consistent and properly implemented
The verification shows that ProjectCard is correctly used across all parent components:
- In ExploreProjects: Basic usage with project prop
- In UserProjects:
- Used with isPending and message props for pending/unverified states
- Used with project prop for normal state
- Props usage matches the component's interface in all cases
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ProjectCard usage in parent components rg -A 5 "ProjectCard" apps/nextjs/src/app/\(home\)Length of output: 4063
apps/nextjs/src/middleware.ts (1)
29-35: Verify the impact on existing admin routes.The new admin access control might affect existing admin routes. Let's verify all admin routes in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to search for admin-related code and access controls.
Admin route access control is properly implemented across the codebase
The new admin access control in middleware.ts aligns with the existing role-based authorization patterns. The codebase shows:
- Consistent "Admin" role checks in the API layer (
packages/api/src/permissions.ts)- Proper role definition in the database schema (
packages/db/src/schema.ts)- Admin-specific routes and components with appropriate role checks
- Project-level admin permissions are also handled separately from global admin role
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all admin routes and their access controls # Search for admin routes in pages/routes echo "Searching for admin routes in the codebase..." rg -l "admin" --type ts --type tsx # Search for role-based access controls echo "Searching for existing role checks..." ast-grep --pattern 'user.role === "Admin"'Length of output: 293
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for admin-related routes and access controls with ripgrep echo "Searching for admin-related paths and components..." rg -i "admin" -t ts -t js -A 3 echo -e "\nSearching for role-based checks..." rg -i "role.*admin|admin.*role" -t ts -t js -A 3Length of output: 15833
apps/website/package.json (2)
24-24:⚠️ Potential issueCaution: Using Next.js canary release in production
The update to
[email protected]raises several concerns:
- Canary releases are pre-release versions that may contain bugs or breaking changes
- The major version bump from 14 to 15 likely includes breaking changes
- The version is pinned exactly without a range, which could make future updates more difficult
Let's verify the compatibility with your current setup:
#!/bin/bash # Check for potential breaking changes in Next.js 15 rg -l "getInitialProps|getServerSideProps|getStaticProps|getStaticPaths" # Check for App Router migration requirements rg -l "pages/" # Look for Next.js specific configurations fd "next.config"Consider these alternatives:
- Use the latest stable version:
"next": "^14.2.14"- If you need v15 features, wait for the stable release
- If you must use canary, add a version range:
"next": "^15.0.2-canary.0"
25-26: Verify React version compatibilityThe React version (18.3.1) is also a pre-release version. Using multiple pre-release versions together increases the risk of compatibility issues.
Let's check for potential React compatibility issues:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about React usage in the codebase.
Let me try a different approach to check React usage and dependencies.
Based on the extensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
React 18.3.1 usage appears safe in this codebase
The codebase shows consistent and standard usage of React features:
- Proper usage of hooks (useState, useEffect, useRef, useCallback)
- No experimental or unstable React features detected
- Clean integration with Next.js and other React-based dependencies
- Consistent React patterns across components
The pre-release version (18.3.1) is being used uniformly across the project, and the codebase follows React best practices without relying on version-specific features that might cause compatibility issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for React specific hooks and features that might be affected rg "use(Effect|State|Context|Reducer|Callback|Ref|ImperativeHandle|LayoutEffect|Debug)" # Check for React.lazy usage rg "React\.lazy|Suspense"Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check React imports and usage patterns rg "from 'react'" -A 2 # Look for specific React hooks usage rg "use[A-Z][a-zA-Z]+" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx # Check package.json files for React related dependencies fd package.json --exec cat {} | jq -r 'select(.dependencies != null) | .dependencies | keys[] | select(contains("react"))'Length of output: 299
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check React imports with simpler grep rg "from ['|\"]react['|\"]" # List all package.json files fd package.json # Check content of website's package.json specifically cat apps/website/package.json # Look for React hooks with simpler pattern rg "useState|useEffect|useContext|useReducer|useCallback|useRef|useImperativeHandle|useLayoutEffect|useDebugValue"Length of output: 33318
apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(root)/permissions/page.tsx (1)
23-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionVerify the async component implementation.
The change to an async component with Promise-based params aligns with Next.js App Router patterns. However, we should ensure proper error handling for the params resolution.
Consider adding error handling:
export default async function Page({ params, }: { params: Promise<{ id: string; }>; }) { - const id = (await params).id; + try { + const id = (await params).id; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to resolve project ID:', error); + throw new Error('Failed to load project permissions'); + }apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(root)/calendar/page.tsx (2)
13-13: LGTM: Import cleanup aligns with current usage.The simplified date-fns import correctly reflects that only
addHoursis being used in the current implementation.
16-16: Verify data fetching after props removal.The removal of
ProjectPagePropsand route parameters suggests a change in how project data is accessed. Since this is in a dynamic route[id], we should ensure the project context is still properly available.Let's verify the project data access pattern in related files:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how project data is accessed in these layout files and the calendar page.
Let me check the calendar page implementation to see how it accesses the project data that's fetched in the parent layout.
Project data access is properly handled through parent layout
The calendar page doesn't need direct access to project data as it's already handled by the parent layout (
[id]/(root)/layout.tsx). The layout component fetches project data usinggetProjectInfoand provides the necessary context. The calendar page itself only renders a calendar component with static events, which is correct for its current implementation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check how other files in the project route handle data fetching # Look for patterns of data fetching in sibling pages and layout files # Check for data fetching patterns in the project route rg -l --type typescript "async function.*Page" "apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]" # Look for potential layout files that might provide project context fd --type file "layout.tsx" "apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]"Length of output: 460
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of layout files and calendar page for project data access patterns rg -A 5 "useProject|getProject|project" "apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/layout.tsx" "apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(root)/layout.tsx" "apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(root)/calendar/page.tsx" # Look for any project-related hooks or utilities rg -l "useProject|getProject" "apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project" # Check for any project context provider ast-grep --pattern 'ProjectProvider|ProjectContext'Length of output: 2815
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the full implementation of the calendar page cat "apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(root)/calendar/page.tsx" # Check if there are any hooks or components used in the calendar page rg -A 3 "import.*from" "apps/nextjs/src/app/(dashboard)/project/[id]/(root)/calendar/page.tsx"Length of output: 2761
apps/nextjs/src/app/(home)/page.tsx (1)
55-55: Confirm that removingasyncfrom thePagefunction does not affect data fetchingThe
Pagecomponent has been changed from anasyncfunction to a regular function. Ensure that all necessary data fetching is properly handled within child components usingSuspenseand that removingasyncfromPagedoes not introduce any unintended side effects or affect server-side rendering behavior.
apps/nextjs/src/lib/auth.ts
Outdated
| export const checkAuth = cache(async () => { | ||
| const session = await auth(); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!session) { | ||
| redirect("/sign-in"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return session; | ||
| }; | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling for auth() call.
The authentication check could fail for reasons other than missing sessions (e.g., network issues, service unavailability).
Consider adding error handling:
export const checkAuth = cache(async () => {
- const session = await auth();
+ try {
+ const session = await auth();
+
+ if (!session) {
+ redirect("/sign-in");
+ }
+
+ return session;
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Authentication check failed:", error);
+ redirect("/sign-in?error=auth_failed");
+ }
- if (!session) {
- redirect("/sign-in");
- }
-
- return session;
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const checkAuth = cache(async () => { | |
| const session = await auth(); | |
| if (!session) { | |
| redirect("/sign-in"); | |
| } | |
| return session; | |
| }; | |
| }); | |
| export const checkAuth = cache(async () => { | |
| try { | |
| const session = await auth(); | |
| if (!session) { | |
| redirect("/sign-in"); | |
| } | |
| return session; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Authentication check failed:", error); | |
| redirect("/sign-in?error=auth_failed"); | |
| } | |
| }); |
| return ( | ||
| <div className="flex flex-col gap-6"> | ||
| <h3 className="text-4xl font-semibold">Explore Projects</h3> | ||
| <div className="grid gap-4 sm:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-3"> | ||
| {allProjects.map((project) => ( | ||
| <ProjectCard key={project.id} project={project} /> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding loading and error states to the component wrapper.
Wrap the component with Suspense and ErrorBoundary for better user experience during loading and error states.
Here's how you could improve the component wrapper:
+export default function ExploreProjectsWrapper() {
+ return (
+ <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Error loading projects</div>}>
+ <Suspense fallback={<LoadingSpinner />}>
+ <ExploreProjects />
+ </Suspense>
+ </ErrorBoundary>
+ );
+}
+
export async function ExploreProjects() {Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| export async function ExploreProjects() { | ||
| const allProjects = await findAllProjects(); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and loading states.
The direct database query without error handling could lead to uncaught runtime errors. Consider implementing proper error boundaries and loading states.
Apply this diff:
+import { ErrorBoundary } from "../_components/error-boundary";
+import { LoadingSpinner } from "../_components/loading-spinner";
+
export async function ExploreProjects() {
- const allProjects = await findAllProjects();
+ try {
+ const allProjects = await findAllProjects();
+ if (!allProjects?.length) {
+ return <p className="text-center text-gray-500">No projects found</p>;
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/website/next.config.ts
Outdated
| experimental: { | ||
| ppr: true, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
PPR configuration needs to be removed or justified
The verification reveals:
- The website app is using Next.js 15.0.2-canary.5 (a pre-release version)
- No PPR-specific patterns ("use server") are found in the website app
- No documentation or intentional PPR setup is evident in the website codebase
This experimental feature should be removed from the configuration unless there's a specific requirement because:
- It's enabled on a canary version of Next.js
- The codebase shows no actual usage of PPR features
- There's no documentation justifying its inclusion
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the intentional enabling of Partial Prerendering (PPR).
PPR is an experimental Next.js 14 feature that fundamentally changes how pages are rendered. While it can improve performance, please ensure:
- The team is aware of its experimental status
- The application has been tested with PPR enabled
- There's a rollback plan if issues arise in production
Let's verify the Next.js version and any PPR-related setup:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Next.js version and PPR usage
echo "Checking Next.js version and PPR setup..."
# Check package.json for Next.js version
jq -r '.dependencies.next // .devDependencies.next' package.json
# Look for PPR-specific patterns in app directory
echo "Checking for PPR usage in components..."
rg -l "use server"
Length of output: 434
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual package.json in the website app and any PPR-related setup
echo "Checking website app's package.json..."
cat apps/website/package.json
echo -e "\nChecking for PPR-specific patterns in website app..."
rg -l "use server" apps/website/
echo -e "\nChecking for any documentation or comments about PPR..."
rg -i "ppr|partial pre-rendering"
Length of output: 9083
|
|
||
| void api.users.findUsersForProject.prefetch({ | ||
| projectId: id, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider the timing of prefetch call.
The void operator is used to explicitly ignore the Promise returned by prefetch. Since this is an async component, we could potentially await the prefetch to ensure data is available before render.
Consider awaiting the prefetch:
- void api.users.findUsersForProject.prefetch({
+ await api.users.findUsersForProject.prefetch({
projectId: id,
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| void api.users.findUsersForProject.prefetch({ | |
| projectId: id, | |
| await api.users.findUsersForProject.prefetch({ | |
| projectId: id, |
| @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ | |||
| "date-fns-tz": "^3.2.0", | |||
| "geist": "^1.3.0", | |||
| "motion-number": "^0.1.7", | |||
| "next": "^14.2.14", | |||
| "next": "15.0.2-canary.5", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the package.json files analysis, I can now provide a final response:
The upgrade to Next.js 15.0.2-canary.5 raises significant concerns:
-
This version is used in multiple packages within the monorepo:
- apps/nextjs/package.json
- apps/website/package.json
-
The current setup shows tight integration with:
- React 18.3.1 (pre-release)
- Multiple tRPC packages (v11.0.0-rc.477)
- Various UI components and dependencies
-
The @amaxa/auth package is still using Next.js 14.2.14, which could lead to version conflicts within the monorepo.
Recommendation: Maintain version consistency by either:
- Keeping all packages on the stable Next.js 14.x series
- Or if testing Next.js 15 features is necessary, upgrade all dependent packages together in a separate development branch
🔗 Analysis chain
The update to "next": "15.0.2-canary.5" raises several concerns:
-
This is a pre-release (canary) version of Next.js 15, which is not recommended for production use as it may contain unstable features and bugs.
-
The major version bump from 14 to 15 likely introduces breaking changes that will require migration work.
-
Using React 18.3.1 (also pre-release) with this specific Next.js canary version may lead to compatibility issues.
Let's verify the official migration guide and current stable version:
Recommendation: Consider using the latest stable version of Next.js 14.x instead of the canary release to ensure stability and production readiness. If you need to test Next.js 15 features, consider doing so in a separate development branch.
Let me try a different approach to gather information about Next.js versions and potential breaking changes.
This will help us:
- Understand the full dependency tree and Next.js usage across the project
- Check Next.js configurations that might be affected by version 15
- Find any internal documentation about upgrades or migrations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the latest stable version of Next.js from npm
echo "Latest stable Next.js version:"
npm show next version
# Check if there's an official blog post or migration guide for Next.js 15
echo -e "\nSearching for Next.js 15 migration guide:"
gh search repos --owner vercel --match name "next.js" --json description | jq '.[] | select(.description | contains("15"))'
Length of output: 388
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json files for Next.js related dependencies and configurations
echo "Checking package.json files:"
fd package.json --exec cat {}
# Look for Next.js configuration files
echo -e "\nChecking Next.js config files:"
fd next.config --extension js,mjs,ts,mts --exec cat {}
# Search for any migration or upgrade related documentation in the repository
echo -e "\nSearching for migration/upgrade documentation:"
rg -i "upgrade|migration|breaking.?changes" -g "*.md"
Length of output: 15756
| import { ExploreProjects } from "./_components/explore-projects"; | ||
| import { UserProjects } from "./_components/UserProjects"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure consistent naming conventions for component files and imports
The import statements for ExploreProjects and UserProjects use different casing in their file paths. ExploreProjects is imported from "./_components/explore-projects", while UserProjects is imported from "./_components/UserProjects". For consistency and to avoid issues on case-sensitive file systems, consider using a consistent naming convention for your component files and their import paths.
| const OneLoading = () => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <div className="min-h-screen p-4 sm:p-6 lg:p-8"> | ||
| <div className=""> | ||
| <div className="flex w-full flex-col gap-5"> | ||
| <div className="flex flex-col gap-6"> | ||
| <div className="flex flex-row justify-between gap-6"> | ||
| <h3 className="text-4xl font-semibold">Your Project</h3> | ||
| {session.user.role === "Admin" ? <CreateProject /> : null} | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="grid gap-4 sm:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-3 "> | ||
| {session.user.status == "Pending" ? ( | ||
| <Card className="col-span-1 row-span-1 flex h-[300px] w-[300px] flex-col items-center justify-center border-dashed bg-secondary/10 transition-transform duration-200"> | ||
| <CardHeader> | ||
| Your account is pending approval, please wait for the admin | ||
| to approve your account | ||
| </CardHeader> | ||
| </Card> | ||
| ) : session.user.status == "Unverified" ? ( | ||
| <Card className="col-span-1 row-span-1 flex h-[300px] w-[300px] flex-col items-center justify-center border-dashed bg-secondary/10 transition-transform duration-200"> | ||
| <CardHeader> | ||
| Your account is unverified, please wait till we verify your | ||
| account to access the platform | ||
| </CardHeader> | ||
| </Card> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <div className="grid gap-4 sm:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-3 "> | ||
| {usersProjects.map((project) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <Link | ||
| key={project.id} | ||
| href={`/project/${project.id}`} | ||
| className="col-span-1 row-span-1 bg-secondary/10 transition-transform duration-200" | ||
| > | ||
| <Card className="col-span-1 row-span-1 bg-secondary/10 transition-transform duration-200"> | ||
| <CardContent className="py-5"> | ||
| <Image | ||
| src={project.image ?? ""} | ||
| width={1000} | ||
| height={500} | ||
| alt={String(project.id)} | ||
| /> | ||
| </CardContent> | ||
| <CardFooter className="justify-center text-center font-bold md:text-2xl"> | ||
| {project.name} | ||
| </CardFooter> | ||
| </Card> | ||
| </Link> | ||
| ); | ||
| })} | ||
| </div> | ||
| )} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="flex flex-col gap-6"> | ||
| <h3 className="text-4xl font-semibold">Explore Projects</h3> | ||
| <div className="grid gap-4 sm:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-3 "> | ||
| {allProjects.map((project) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <Link key={project.id} href={`/project/${project.id}`}> | ||
| <Card className="col-span-1 row-span-1 bg-secondary/10 transition-transform duration-200"> | ||
| <CardContent className="py-5"> | ||
| <Image | ||
| src={project.image ?? ""} | ||
| width={1000} | ||
| height={500} | ||
| alt={String(project.id)} | ||
| /> | ||
| </CardContent> | ||
| <CardFooter className="justify-center text-center font-bold md:text-2xl"> | ||
| {project.name} | ||
| </CardFooter> | ||
| </Card> | ||
| </Link> | ||
| ); | ||
| })} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="flex flex-col gap-6"> | ||
| <div className="flex flex-row justify-between gap-6"> | ||
| <Skeleton className="h-10 w-48" /> | ||
| <Skeleton className="h-10 w-32" /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="grid gap-4 sm:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-3"> | ||
| {[...Array(6)].map((_, index) => ( | ||
| <Card key={index} className="col-span-1 row-span-1 bg-secondary/10"> | ||
| <CardContent className="py-5"> | ||
| <Skeleton className="h-40 w-full" /> | ||
| </CardContent> | ||
| <CardFooter className="justify-center"> | ||
| <Skeleton className="h-6 w-3/4" /> | ||
| </CardFooter> | ||
| </Card> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| ); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor OneLoading and TwoLoading components to reduce code duplication
The OneLoading and TwoLoading components have very similar structures and render similar content with minor differences. To adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle, consider abstracting the shared code into a single reusable loading component that accepts props to handle any variations.
Also applies to: 34-54
| getUserProjects(session.user.id), | ||
| findAllProjects(), | ||
| ]); | ||
| export const experimental_ppr = true; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
PPR configuration is properly set but needs version alignment
The codebase has experimental_ppr = true in the page while using Next.js 15.0.2-canary.5. There are two different next.config.js files with different PPR configurations:
- One has
experimental.ppr: true - Another has
experimental.ppr: "incremental"
Since Next.js 14.0.0, PPR should be configured as "incremental" for better performance. Update all PPR configurations to use "incremental" consistently:
- In the page file: Change
export const experimental_ppr = truetoexport const experimental_ppr = "incremental" - In next.config.js files: Ensure all instances use
ppr: "incremental"
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the use of experimental_ppr and ensure it's properly configured
You've added export const experimental_ppr = true;. Ensure that this experimental feature is supported in your current Next.js version and that it's properly configured in your next.config.js (e.g., under the experimental flag). Additionally, be aware of any potential side effects or breaking changes that might occur when using experimental features.
Run the following script to confirm that experimental.ppr is set to "incremental" in your Next.js configuration:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if `experimental.ppr` is set in `next.config.js`
# Test: Search for `experimental.ppr` setting in `next.config.js` files.
# Expect: Find at least one occurrence indicating proper configuration.
rg 'experimental\s*:\s*{[^}]*\bppr\s*:\s*["\']incremental["\']' next.config.js
Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if next.config.js exists and its content
fd -e js -e mjs -e cjs -e ts "next.config" -x cat {}
# Also check for experimental PPR in package.json to verify Next.js version
cat package.json | grep -A 5 "next"
Length of output: 2664
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Next.js version in the workspace
cat apps/nextjs/package.json | grep -A 2 '"next":'
Length of output: 136
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Chores
These updates enhance user experience, improve performance, and streamline access control within the application.