ACS-7350: add logging for HttpFileUploader

[azakrzewski-hy]

ACS-7350

[mpichura]

Error:  Failures: 
Error:    HttpHxInsightStorageClientTest.testUploadDataFromInputStream:86 
Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
fileUploaderMock.upload(
    FileUploadRequest[file=File[data=Mock for InputStream, hashCode: 424974506], contentType=plain/text, storageLocation=Mock for URL, hashCode: 837267422]
);
-> at org.alfresco.hxi_connector.live_ingester.adapters.messaging.hx_insight.storage.HttpHxInsightStorageClientTest.testUploadDataFromInputStream(HttpHxInsightStorageClientTest.java:86)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
fileUploaderMock.upload(
    FileUploadRequest[file=File[data=Mock for InputStream, hashCode: 424974506], contentType=plain/text, storageLocation=Mock for URL, hashCode: 837267422],
    "node-ref"
);
-> at org.alfresco.hxi_connector.live_ingester.adapters.messaging.hx_insight.storage.HttpHxInsightStorageClient.upload(HttpHxInsightStorageClient.java:64)

[azakrzewski-hy]

Error:  Failures: 
Error:    HttpHxInsightStorageClientTest.testUploadDataFromInputStream:86 
Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
fileUploaderMock.upload(
    FileUploadRequest[file=File[data=Mock for InputStream, hashCode: 424974506], contentType=plain/text, storageLocation=Mock for URL, hashCode: 837267422]
);
-> at org.alfresco.hxi_connector.live_ingester.adapters.messaging.hx_insight.storage.HttpHxInsightStorageClientTest.testUploadDataFromInputStream(HttpHxInsightStorageClientTest.java:86)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
fileUploaderMock.upload(
    FileUploadRequest[file=File[data=Mock for InputStream, hashCode: 424974506], contentType=plain/text, storageLocation=Mock for URL, hashCode: 837267422],
    "node-ref"
);
-> at org.alfresco.hxi_connector.live_ingester.adapters.messaging.hx_insight.storage.HttpHxInsightStorageClient.upload(HttpHxInsightStorageClient.java:64)

done in 260c2e1

[tpage-alfresco]

Looks good. Thanks Adam!

[mpichura]

LGTM

[krdabrowski]

Overall LGTM, I only propose one change to log message as it's a bit ambiguous IMO