-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added support to other naming strategy #754
Added support to other naming strategy #754
Conversation
3221250
to
b90af7b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See inline the fundamental question how record name strategy should work to be clarified
af7f346
to
3471482
Compare
3471482
to
462d3b7
Compare
bc0bfd7
to
a7d0843
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall LGTM. Could you also add a test on how the record and topic-record naming strategy are supposed to work with an Avro schema without namespace?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM except documentation change is not correct...
a7d0843
to
952b9f4
Compare
952b9f4
to
74b4cc9
Compare
…d stuff and added a couple of tests
74b4cc9
to
535d652
Compare
Before that commit the other strategies where existing but not effectively usable/tested in the codebase.
This pr adds the support and set tests to effectively test the naming strategies.
During the development I've also added a little bit more typing over the files I've touched to improve the codebase