Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade form-data from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1 #63

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Abuchtela
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade form-data from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on a month ago.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade form-data from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1.

See this package in yarn:
form-data

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/abuchtela/project/e701f849-25b2-4fdd-b223-96e2a86e505e?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 7, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
aptos-core ❌ Failed (Inspect) Nov 7, 2024 10:33pm
aptos-core-n9hp ❌ Failed (Inspect) Nov 7, 2024 10:33pm

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Copy link

Report too large to display inline

View full report↗︎

Copy link

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Alert Package NoteSourceCI
Critical CVE npm/@babel/[email protected] ⚠︎
Possible typosquat attack npm/[email protected] ⚠︎

View full report↗︎

Next steps

What is a critical CVE?

Contains a Critical Common Vulnerability and Exposure (CVE).

Remove or replace dependencies that include known critical CVEs. Consumers can use dependency overrides or npm audit fix --force to remove vulnerable dependencies.

What is a typosquat?

Package name is similar to other popular packages and may not be the package you want.

Use care when consuming similarly named packages and ensure that you did not intend to consume a different package. Malicious packages often publish using similar names as existing popular packages.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/[email protected] or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove the stale label, comment or push a commit - otherwise this will be closed in 15 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Dec 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants