You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, guys~
After turning my own data into .rec, .Ist files, I ran then train.py when I met problem like this
` src/io/iter_image_det_recordio.cc:281: ImageDetRecordIOParser: /home/ding/detector/mxnet-ssd/data/train.rec, use 39 threads for decoding..
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "train.py", line 146, in
tensorboard=args.tensorboard)
File "/home/ding/detector/mxnet-ssd/train/train_net.py", line 223, in train_net
label_pad_width=label_pad_width, path_imglist=train_list, **cfg.train)
File "/home/ding/detector/mxnet-ssd/dataset/iterator.py", line 60, in init
**kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/io.py", line 936, in creator
ctypes.byref(iter_handle)))
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/base.py", line 149, in check_call
raise MXNetError(py_str(_LIB.MXGetLastError()))
mxnet.base.MXNetError: [15:40:36] src/io/iter_image_det_recordio.cc:327: ImageDetRecordIOParser: label_pad_width: 350 smaller than estimated width: 380
In the file of 'iter_image_det_recordio.cc', I found this code if (max_label_width > param_.label_pad_width) { if (param_.label_pad_width > 0) { LOG(FATAL) << "ImageDetRecordIOParser: label_pad_width: " << param_.label_pad_width << " smaller than estimated width: " << max_label_width; } param_.label_pad_width = max_label_width; }.
I found the estimated width increased as my data capacity increased. The hint noticed my params --label-width(label_pad_width in the .cc code) was smaller than the estimated width( max_label_width in the .cc code). What does the label-width mean? And how was the estimated width calculated? What may be the problems in my dataset?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, guys~
After turning my own data into .rec, .Ist files, I ran then train.py when I met problem like this
` src/io/iter_image_det_recordio.cc:281: ImageDetRecordIOParser: /home/ding/detector/mxnet-ssd/data/train.rec, use 39 threads for decoding..
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "train.py", line 146, in
tensorboard=args.tensorboard)
File "/home/ding/detector/mxnet-ssd/train/train_net.py", line 223, in train_net
label_pad_width=label_pad_width, path_imglist=train_list, **cfg.train)
File "/home/ding/detector/mxnet-ssd/dataset/iterator.py", line 60, in init
**kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/io.py", line 936, in creator
ctypes.byref(iter_handle)))
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/base.py", line 149, in check_call
raise MXNetError(py_str(_LIB.MXGetLastError()))
mxnet.base.MXNetError: [15:40:36] src/io/iter_image_det_recordio.cc:327: ImageDetRecordIOParser: label_pad_width: 350 smaller than estimated width: 380
Stack trace returned 10 entries:
[bt] (0) /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/libmxnet.so(+0x30cbe2) [0x7fd8c901bbe2]
[bt] (1) /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/libmxnet.so(+0x30d1b8) [0x7fd8c901c1b8]
[bt] (2) /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/libmxnet.so(+0x2a1cda0) [0x7fd8cb72bda0]
[bt] (3) /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/libmxnet.so(+0x2a1dbfa) [0x7fd8cb72cbfa]
[bt] (4) /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/libmxnet.so(+0x2a198dd) [0x7fd8cb7288dd]
[bt] (5) /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/libmxnet.so(+0x2a03fde) [0x7fd8cb712fde]
[bt] (6) /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/libmxnet.so(+0x2a0361d) [0x7fd8cb71261d]
[bt] (7) /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mxnet/libmxnet.so(MXDataIterCreateIter+0x1d0) [0x7fd8cb5ee180]
[bt] (8) /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.6(ffi_call_unix64+0x4c) [0x7fd955de9e40]
[bt] (9) /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.6(ffi_call+0x2eb) [0x7fd955de98ab]`.
In the file of 'iter_image_det_recordio.cc', I found this code
if (max_label_width > param_.label_pad_width) { if (param_.label_pad_width > 0) { LOG(FATAL) << "ImageDetRecordIOParser: label_pad_width: " << param_.label_pad_width << " smaller than estimated width: " << max_label_width; } param_.label_pad_width = max_label_width; }
.I found the estimated width increased as my data capacity increased. The hint noticed my params --label-width(label_pad_width in the .cc code) was smaller than the estimated width( max_label_width in the .cc code). What does the label-width mean? And how was the estimated width calculated? What may be the problems in my dataset?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: