You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@yegor256 in this pr #296 we have an unresolved conversation:
{
"data": {
"repository": {
"pullRequest": {
"reviewThreads": {
"nodes": [
{
"id": "PRRT_kwDOL6J6Ss5Bowwb",
"isResolved": false,
"comments": {
"nodes": [
{
"id": "PRRC_kwDOL6J6Ss5mrYua",
"body": "@Suban05 Why not use web mock for this cases? Testing mode used for run yml files, for example - https://github.com/zerocracy/judges-action/blob/master/judges/github-events/quick-scan.yml",
"author": {
"login": "Yegorov"
},
"createdAt": "2024-08-20T03:49:18Z"
},
{
"id": "PRRC_kwDOL6J6Ss5mrhrm",
"body": "@Yegorov good question. For the `pull-was-merged` event, we use `Fbe.github_graph`. Maybe I don't understand something, but it's very difficult to mock this thing by `WebMock`. And I use a fake client for `Fbe.github_graph`. However, there is an `options` argument in both clients (`Fbe.octo` and `Fbe.github_graph`), and when I set `testing` globally, `Fbe.octo` also becomes a fake client. That's why I use fake clients",
"author": {
"login": "Suban05"
},
"createdAt": "2024-08-20T04:56:54Z"
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
but it has been written as a resolved:
It looks like a bug...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Suban05 Congratulations on reporting a new bug! As per our work policy, you've earned 16 points for your valuable contribution. Your keen eye helps enhance our project's quality. Remember, if you spot anything else in the repository that doesn't look up to par, don't hesitate to report it. Keep up the great work! Your current balance stands at +531 points. 🐛✨
@yegor256 in this pr #296 we have an unresolved conversation:
but it has been written as a resolved:
It looks like a bug...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: