refactor: correct minor mistakes picked up by coderabbitai in nitpick comments

[roomman]

@ymc9 very minor changes based on feedback from coderabbitai, based on my previous PR. Sorry I didn't catch these before you merged.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request enhance the testing coverage for the Tanstack Query React Hooks V5, focusing on various query and mutation scenarios. New tests have been added for optimistic updates and nested relationships, ensuring correct cache behavior after mutations. Additionally, modifications to the modelMeta object in the test-model-meta.ts file now require the category field in the post model, reflecting a change from optional to required. Minor corrections in comments were also made to improve clarity.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
packages/plugins/tanstack-query/tests/react-hooks-v5.test.tsx	Added tests for optimistic updates and nested mutations, validating cache behavior under various conditions. Minor comment corrections made.
packages/plugins/tanstack-query/tests/test-model-meta.ts	Updated modelMeta for the post model by removing the isOptional property from the category field, making it required.

Possibly related PRs

• fix(hooks): support optimistic update for "upsert" #1767: This PR enhances the testing coverage for optimistic updates, which is a key focus of the main PR, ensuring that the cache reflects the expected state after mutations.
• feat(hooks): optimistic update for nested relations #1842: This PR introduces tests for optimistic updates for nested relations, which aligns with the main PR's focus on testing various query and mutation scenarios, including nested updates.
• fix: optimistic updates for nested queries should work then optional relationships have null values #1884: This PR addresses optimistic updates for nested queries, ensuring that optional relationships with null values are handled correctly, which is relevant to the main PR's emphasis on testing cache behavior after mutations.

Suggested reviewers

• ymc9

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

packages/plugins/tanstack-query/tests/react-hooks-v5.test.tsx (1)

Line range hint 390-503: Consider enhancing the test coverage for deeply nested relationships.

The test case effectively validates optimistic updates for deeply nested queries. However, there's an open TODO comment about including the category object in optimistic updates that should be addressed.

Consider these improvements:

1. Add assertions to verify the complete object structure including the category relationship
2. Test the rollback scenario when the mutation fails
3. Add test cases for concurrent updates to the same nested relationship

Example assertion to include category object:

 expect(posts[0]).toMatchObject({
     $optimistic: true,
     id: expect.any(String),
     title: 'post1',
     ownerId: '1',
     categoryId: '1',
+    category: {
+        $optimistic: true,
+        id: '1',
+        name: 'category1'
+    }
 });

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5e4e7c and 4e08271.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• packages/plugins/tanstack-query/tests/react-hooks-v5.test.tsx (2 hunks)
• packages/plugins/tanstack-query/tests/test-model-meta.ts (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• packages/plugins/tanstack-query/tests/test-model-meta.ts

[ymc9]

Thanks for the improvements. I merged the last one too fast haha

The base branch was changed.