diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index e117939..0c7a79b 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ close(fd)
 
 A modern implementation of this interface has **hundreds of thousands of lines of code**. Lots of complexity is hidden under the hood. Yet it is easy to use due to its simple interface.
 
-> This deep module example is taken from the book [A Philosophy of Software Design](https://web.stanford.edu/~ouster/cgi-bin/book.php) by John K. Ousterhout. Not only does this book cover the very essence of complexity in software development, but it also has the greatest interpretation of Parnas' influential paper [On the Criteria To Be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules](https://www.win.tue.nl/~wstomv/edu/2ip30/references/criteria_for_modularization.pdf). Both are essential reads. Other related readings: [It's probably time to stop recommending Clean Code](It's probably time to stop recommending Clean Code), [Small Functions considered Harmful](https://copyconstruct.medium.com/small-functions-considered-harmful-91035d316c29), [Linear code is more readable](https://blog.separateconcerns.com/2023-09-11-linear-code.html).
+> This deep module example is taken from the book [A Philosophy of Software Design](https://web.stanford.edu/~ouster/cgi-bin/book.php) by John K. Ousterhout. Not only does this book cover the very essence of complexity in software development, but it also has the greatest interpretation of Parnas' influential paper [On the Criteria To Be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules](https://www.win.tue.nl/~wstomv/edu/2ip30/references/criteria_for_modularization.pdf). Both are essential reads. Other related readings: [It's probably time to stop recommending Clean Code](https://qntm.org/clean), [Small Functions considered Harmful](https://copyconstruct.medium.com/small-functions-considered-harmful-91035d316c29), [Linear code is more readable](https://blog.separateconcerns.com/2023-09-11-linear-code.html).
 
 If you think we are rooting for bloated God objects with too many responsibilities, you got it wrong.