-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
lmumihs.tex
executable file
·73 lines (57 loc) · 2.58 KB
/
lmumihs.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
% !TEX spellcheck = en_US
% !TeX program = pdflatex
% !TeX TXS-program:bibliography = txs:///bibtex
% !BIB program = bibtex
%% LMU-MI-HS-Template
%% This template is an adaptation of the IEEE InfoVis/Vis format
%% http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~vis/Tasks/camera_tvcg.html
%% Last update: Bastian Pfleging, 05.2016
\documentclass[journal]{vgtc} % final (journal style)
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{mathptmx}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{mdframed}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage[hyphens]{url}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{dcolumn}
\usepackage[backend=bibtex, style=numeric, isbn=true, doi=true, maxnames=99]{biblatex}
% WaterMarker
\addbibresource{literature.bib}
\DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.pdf,.jpg,.pdf,.mps,.png}
\graphicspath{{img/}}
\normalfont
%% Paper title.
\title{A Literature Overview on Explanations in Recommender System and Possible Criteria for Designing Brief Explanation}
%% Put your name here
\author{Yifei Zhan, Sarah Theres Völkel}
\authorfooter{
%% change name, course (Media Informatics/Informatics/etc) and email for the footer
\item
Yifei Zhan is studying Media Informatics at the University of Munich, Germany, E-mail: [email protected]
\item
This research paper was written for the Media Informatics Advanced Seminar ' Hauptseminar Medieninformatik', 2017
}
%% Abstract section.
\abstract{
This paper provides a literature overview of explanations in recommender systems.
It introduced two standards/criteria on how to design and evaluate explanations in recommender systems.
In general, the type of explanations depends on the goal of the system.
For example, in some scenarios, like in a driving context, pages of explanations might not be suitable. In this case,
drivers may prefer brief explanations. In order to find possible criteria for it, we extracted some principles from two recent studies and what we have found is that \textbf{efficiency}, \textbf{persuasiveness} and \textbf{why} question-type-based explanations might be suitable for brief explanations. However, more studies need to be done in order to explore other possible criteria for it.
} % end of abstract
%% Keywords that describe your work.
\keywords{Explanation, Recommender system, Personalisation}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% START OF THE PAPER %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\input{introduction}
\input{body}
\input{conclusion}
%% Do not change the following:
%\bibliographystyle{abbrv}
\printbibliography
\end{document}