Consistent missed ban behaviour & ABBA Bans

[clxxiii]

Take a 2 ban match for example:
If Team A has banned once, and it's Team B's turn to pick, if the timer runs out, Team A will get two bans, and Team B will get one ban,

If Team A hasn't been banned, and their timer runs out, priority will switch to Team B, and both teams will get two bans

The expected behavior is that both cases are the same, whether the ban is skipped, or you lose priority

[clxxiii]

To add consistency, bans should be implemented in a "queue" style system, where if you miss your timer, it gets appended to the end of the queue.

Using an architecture like this should also make implementing an ABBA, ABAB, or AABB ban pattern possible.