Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

renovate bug #2931

Closed
Closed

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented Feb 26, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
org.apache.lucene:lucene-backward-codecs (source) 9.8.0 -> 9.10.0 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate-bot renovate-bot force-pushed the renovate/lucene.version branch 2 times, most recently from b9246ad to d56cd22 Compare February 28, 2024 08:19
@renovate-bot renovate-bot force-pushed the renovate/lucene.version branch from d56cd22 to 33cdb40 Compare March 22, 2024 10:34
@renovate-bot renovate-bot changed the title Update dependency org.apache.lucene:lucene-backward-codecs to v9.10.0 Update dependency org.apache.lucene:lucene-backward-codecs to v9.10.0 - autoclosed Mar 29, 2024
@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/lucene.version branch March 29, 2024 14:19
@tmortagne tmortagne changed the title Update dependency org.apache.lucene:lucene-backward-codecs to v9.10.0 - autoclosed renovate bug Mar 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant