You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your amazing work!
I am very interested in the ATLoss, but there is a little question I want to ask.
When using the ATLoss, should we add a no-relation label?
For example, there are 26 relation types, the gold labels may contain multiple relation types, but at least one relation type.
How to represent the no-relation? Show I create a tensor of size 27 and set the first label 1 or a tensor of size 26 and set all the labels zero?
Look forward to your reply. Many Thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your amazing work!
I am very interested in the ATLoss, but there is a little question I want to ask.
When using the ATLoss, should we add a no-relation label?
For example, there are 26 relation types, the gold labels may contain multiple relation types, but at least one relation type.
How to represent the no-relation? Show I create a tensor of size 27 and set the first label 1 or a tensor of size 26 and set all the labels zero?
Look forward to your reply. Many Thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: