Shorten the package name #7
Labels
priority: low
The issue/PR is low priority—not many people are affected or there’s a workaround, etc.
type: enhancement
The issue is a request for an enhancement.
This is kind of a follow up from #6 (comment)
User story
It's rather a cosmetic 💅 problem, but I think it'd be nice to settle on good names, as later it could be hard to ever them.
As a user of Grow tools, I'd like to write less code/configs/ etc. and avoid repetition.
Also when it comes to the package name.
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Currently, we use a format of
woocommerce-grow-{package-name}
for our tools here. (As it was introduced in the very first package)It has a set of benefits:
But I have a doubt, whether it's not too long. Especially, when the package name adds up, and the name is used not only in
package.json
'sdevDependencies
, but also in some other files, like configs, like:<woo-tracking-jsdoc></woo-tracking-jsdoc>
package.json
'sscripts
which to be fully consistent would be renamed to:Describe the solution you'd like
I see a few ways to go:
woocommerce-grow-{package-name}
for every package referencewoo-grow-{package-name}
For
woo-grow-
I could list a few benefitswoo-grow-ping-porter
CLI/slack command. Also Grow is not a part of WooCommerce plugin, but rather Woo as an organization.woocommerce
packages. - "Iswoocommerce-grow-up
a WooCommerce's "grow-up" package, or WooCommerce Grow'sup
package?"Unknowns
Out of bounds/rabbit holes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: