Update index.html

stages/task-recent-changes/index.html

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ <h1>
 
           <h2>Goal</h2>
 	  <p>The goal of this task is to assess <b>all edits</b> made to pathways in the last 10 days, including edits to existing pathways and newly added pathways. Edits are assessed and tagged based on their current status, with the goal of inclusion in the <b>Approved</b> set. The criteria for inclusion in this set are highlighted below.</p>
-	  <p><b>To save yourself time and effort, open the <a href="https://github.com/wikipathways/wikipathways-help/discussions/new?category=curation-reports" target=_blank>Weekly Curation report</a> and take notes directly in the form</b>.</p>
+	  <p><b>To save yourself time and effort, open the <a href="https://github.com/wikipathways/wikipathways-help/discussions/new?category=curation-reports" target=_blank>Weekly Review report</a> and take notes directly in the form</b>.</p>
 
       <div style="background-color:#FBFAE2; padding-left: 40px">
           <h3>Criteria for pathways to be <b>approved</b>:</h3>
@@ -57,10 +57,10 @@ <h3>Criteria for pathways to be <b>approved</b>:</h3>
      <h2>Instructions</h2>
 
 	  <ul>
-	  <li>Click the pathway image or title below to view the pathway at WikiPathways (classic). You will need to be logged in at WikiPathways.</li> 
-	  <li>Using the <b>History</b> tab, open the previous version in a new window to compare the two revisions. The edit comment entered by the author should indicate what aspects of the pathway were updated. </li> 
-      	  <li>Updates to the layout of the pathway can be assessed by reviewing the pathway diagram; updates to other aspects of the pathway (i.e. description, datanode annotations, bibliography) can be assessed by comparing the relevant sections.</li>
-	  <li>For pathway edits to approved pathways, you can also use GitHub's diff viewer to assess edits. Let's use <b>WP5424</b> as an example:</li>
+	  <li>Click the pathway image or title below to view the pathway at WikiPathways classic. You will need to be logged in at WikiPathways.</li> 
+	  <li>Updates to the layout of the pathway are assessed by reviewing the pathway diagram; updates to other aspects of the pathway (i.e. description, datanode annotations, bibliography) are assessed by comparing the relevant sections.</li>
+	  <li>Using the <b>History</b> tab, open the previous version in a new window to compare the two revisions. The edit comment entered by the author should indicate what aspects of the pathway were updated.</li> 
+	  <li><b>For pathway edits to approved pathways</b>: Use GitHub's diff viewer to assess edits. Let's use <b>WP5424</b> as an example:</li>
 			<ul>
 			<li>Navigate to the pathway page on WikiPathways.org, for example <a href="https://www.wikipathways.org/pathways/WP5424.html" target="_blank">https://www.wikipathways.org/pathways/WP5424.html</a>.</li> 
 			<li>In the <b>Activity</b> section under the pathway, click the <b>last edited</b> date badge. This will take you to the GitHub page listing <a href="https://github.com/wikipathways/wikipathways.github.io/commits/main/_pathways/WP5424.md" target="_blank">all commits</a> 
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ <h2>Instructions</h2>
 			</ul>
 	<li>Evaluate the changes as follows: </li>
       		<ul>
-	       	<li>If the change is not valid, revert the edit in the <b>History</b> table. If unsure, start a discussion using the links in the <b>Talk</b> page.</li>
-            	<li>If the change is valid, and the pathway is already part of the <b>Approved</b> set, make sure to update the tag by clicking the <b>Click here to apply to current revision</b> link in the outdated tag.</li>
+	       	<li>If the change is not valid, revert the edit in the <b>History</b> table (on WikiPathways classic). If you're unsure about an edit, add a note about the issue to your Reviewer report, and report it to our curation issues tracker by clicking the button below.</li>
+            	<li>If the change is valid, and the pathway is already part of the <b>Approved</b> set, update the tag by clicking the <b>Click here to apply to current revision</b> link in the outdated tag.</li>
             	<li>If the pathway is a new pathway, consider adding the <b>Approved version</b> tag to the pathway if it fulfills the criteria listed above.</li>
 	       <li>Add other quality tags where appropriate; <b>Under Construction</b> for pathways that appear incomplete, but are not test pathways (i.e. the content is unique), <b>Test Pathway</b> for pathways that are mostly empty, filled with random content, or has "Test" in the title.</li>
       		</ul>