Gc intro block

[jmealing]

To do:

[ ✓] GCWeb french
[✓] DTO guidance

DTO design system PRs:
EN: canada-ca/design-system#307
FR: canada-ca/systeme-conception#210

[duboisp]

Pre-approved upon successful local testing and review.

[duboisp]

A few changes:

• The irregular heading structure need to be addressed either by proper messaging or by moving the demo onto its own page.
• Missing a demo for the first example, I proposed some text and to reuse the current page as being the demo page
• Should the intro block with the byline added?

Side question: We should think of how this intro pattern are going to be linked with the heading level 1 component (which include double h1).
Is this design pattern are only informational and suggestive? Or will it needs to be monitored like other stable component, to advise web author of any update that must be applied to the intro block if there is a major change?

[duboisp]

@Garneauma as discussed

[Garneauma]

@jmealing Could you please move this documentation in the newly created section /design-patterns ? Thank you.

[jmealing]

I can't edit this PR anymore. Not sure why. @delisma ?

[Garneauma]

• Please wrap the code sample in a container and add a title for it.
• Can you convert the documentation to the new data-first approach? You can base your JSON file on the Date modified component.

[duboisp]

Reviewed and tested, everything is functional and do work as expected. I tested with the feature addition that was made to the background image component.

There is a few request of change, see the inline comments:

• Remove any reference that leverage our versioning API
• Make one little translation.

[duboisp]

One little and tiny change to make. Everything else is good to go.

Side note: If this PR is merged after gc-institution PR, we will simply need to resolve the conflict on the documentation_pattern.html layout.

[duboisp]

Reviewed and tested, everything look great.

We will wait for the completion of all the request in https://github.com/orgs/wet-boew/projects/4/views/1 + approval from DTO and PP before to merge it.

[duboisp]

Reviewed again and tested again locally,

No issue and this is ready for merge when approved/coordinated with the other related PRs.

[duboisp]

Nothing has changes, this is only resolving the merge conflict regarding our generated files.

So my last review is still accurate and we did get the approval from PP and DTO to merge the PR related to ILP.