Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

splitChunks.{cacheGroup}.chunks to also support "function (chunk) | RegExp" #5188

Closed
pushkargupta9807 opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@pushkargupta9807
Copy link

Add the function type or regexp for splitChunks.{cacheGroup}. chunks.

Just like below in webpack
https://webpack.js.org/plugins/split-chunks-plugin/#splitchunkschunks

This sure improves the perf in our case, because there are tons of 'async' chunks in our use-case and we do not want to go through each of the chunk.

This is related to the previously completed request by @bvanjoi : #4376

Thanks!

Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 3, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If this issue is still affecting you, please leave any comment (for example, "bump"). We are sorry that we haven't been able to prioritize it yet. If you have any new additional information, please include it with your comment!

@stale stale bot added the stale label Mar 3, 2024
@pushkargupta9807
Copy link
Author

Bump ^

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Mar 4, 2024
Copy link

stale bot commented May 3, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If this issue is still affecting you, please leave any comment (for example, "bump"). We are sorry that we haven't been able to prioritize it yet. If you have any new additional information, please include it with your comment!

@stale stale bot added the stale label May 3, 2024
@pushkargupta9807
Copy link
Author

bump

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jun 6, 2024
@LingyuCoder
Copy link
Contributor

Supported by #5019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants