Candidate/Proposed changes markup

[plehegar]

The T style sheet was adjusted as well:
[[

• • .correction for "candidate corrections" (div, aside, details, section)
• • .addition for "candidate additions" (div, aside, details, section)
• • .correction.proposed for "proposed corrections" (div, aside, details, section)
• • .addition.proposed for "proposed additions" (div, aside, details, section)
    ]]
    https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/2016/base.css

We should reflect those CSS classes (without bounding them to specific HTML elements for forward compat) in:
https://github.com/w3c/specberus/blob/main/lib/rules/sotd/rec-addition.js

This is related to w3c/csswg-drafts#5807

[plehegar]

To be clear, unless .correction.proposed and .addition.proposed appear in the document, we should require only require
the SOTD text: "This document was published by the @@ Working Group as a Recommendation."

[jennyliang220]

New Rules

Type	candidate corrections	proposed corrections	candidate additions	proposed additions	no change
Class	.correction	.correction.proposed	.addition	.addition.proposed
Text	Candidate corrections are marked in the document.	Proposed corrections are marked in the document.	Candidate additions are marked in the document.	Proposed additions are marked in the document.
SOTD	This document was published by the @@ Working Group as a Recommendation. It includes candidate corrections.	This document was published by the @@ Working Group as a Recommendation. It includes proposed corrections.	This document was published by the @@ Working Group as a Recommendation. It includes candidate additions, introducing new features since the previous Recommendation.	This document was published by the @@ Working Group as a Recommendation. It includes proposed additions, introducing new features since the previous Recommendation.	This document was published by the @@ Working Group as a Recommendation. This document does not contain any candidate or proposed changes.

In addtion to the table above, for document with both proposed corrections and proposed additions, SOTD would be:

This document was published by the @@ Working Group as a Recommendation. It includes proposed change(s)?, introducing substantive change(s)? and new feature(s)? since the previous Recommendation.

Question

1. Not bounding HTML

without bounding them to specific HTML elements for forward compat

@plehegar just to be clear, does it mean the Text for HTML element doesn't has to be 'Candidate corrections are marked in the document.'?

Answer: It means the HTML elements can be p, span, div or anything else.

2. SOTD paragraph

To be clear, unless .correction.proposed and .addition.proposed appear in the document, we should require only require the SOTD text: "This document was published by the @@ Working Group as a Recommendation."

Should Pubrules allows more sentences after "published by ... as a Recommendation.''?

e.g. "If you wish to make comments regarding this document, please send them to..."

specberus/test/docs/sotd/rec-obsl.html

Lines 63 to 70 in 5405a04

	<p>
	This document was published by the <a href="@@WG homepage@@">Foobar Working Group</a> as a Recommendation. If you wish to make comments regarding this document, please send them to
	<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> (<a href="mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe">subscribe</a>,
	<a href="https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/mailinglist-comments/">archives</a>). All comments are welcome.
	<!-- substantiveChanges: true, newFeatures: true -->
	It includes <a href="https://www.w3.org/2020/Process-20200915/#proposed-changes">proposed changes</a>,
	introducing substantive changes and new features since the Previous Recommendation.
	</p>

Answer: Yes, there can be more sentences.

[jennyliang220]

@plehegar any idea when will https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/tree/gh-pages/p2020mockup have the mockups? So that specberus can start implementing it.

[svgeesus]

This is presumably the cause of #1312

[svgeesus]

@plehegar @jennyliang220 should I just note an open specberus bug and send a publication request anyway?

[plehegar]

I added mockups for candidate changes w3c/tr-design#244