Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add execCommand spec? #1429

Closed
Elchi3 opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Add execCommand spec? #1429

Elchi3 opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Elchi3
Copy link

Elchi3 commented Jul 29, 2024

I see there is currently this entry for execCommand:

"https://w3c.github.io/editing/docs/execCommand/": {
"lastreviewed": "2024-03-01",
"comment": "no longer worked on and not implemented consistently or fully by user agents"
},

BCD/MDN would like to reference the spec for https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document/execCommand at: https://w3c.github.io/editing/docs/execCommand/#dom-document-execcommand

w3c/trusted-types#500 (comment) says "https://w3c.github.io/editing/docs/execCommand/ is a bit dramatic about its status. It definitely needs to continue to be maintained."

Should this be added? Thoughts?

@tidoust
Copy link
Member

tidoust commented Jul 29, 2024

Adding links to past discussions on the topic:

Since then (or in parallel):

  • The spec was added as a potential deliverable to the new Web Editing WG charter
  • The Trusted Types thread suggests that @zcorpan will take over editing.

It would be great if there were some clearer signal in the spec itself that its maintenance has resumed.

@tidoust
Copy link
Member

tidoust commented Aug 29, 2024

Closing as the execCommand spec was added to the list. The spec was added with a "pending" standing, pending proper adoption in the Web Editing WG and initial updates to the spec to note that it is no longer an "unofficial draft".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants