You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should provide guidance for how customers decide on the appropriate Node sizings.
What do we recommend for instance sizing? Why would I choose one size over another?
Node sizing affects your blast radius when hardware fails/performs lifecycle operations
How many Pods will fit on a Node?
A consideration: each Node requires some control plane Pods to be running
Are there other considerations when choosing Node sizes?
Description of NodeAllocatable and its impact on sizing.
How can customers ensure that they are efficiently operating these Nodes (ie. mostly full to reduce cost, but also enough slack to handle new workload requirements)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Node sizing is basically the same question as "how big of a server do I need to run linux?" I think your discussion of blast radius and resource allocation is likely the right way to go here. There should also be some bare minimum to run TKG with recommended extensions in a reference architecture scenario (high availability) -- everything above that depends on use case.
We should provide guidance for how customers decide on the appropriate Node sizings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: